Vicarious Learning in New Product Introductions in the Early Years of a Converging Market

Technological developments combine previously distinct technologies that result in converging markets. In converging markets, firms from different industries compete against each other, often for the first time. We propose that firms introducing new products in converging markets will learn vicariously from other firms in the market. Further, we propose that this learning will vary across the dual-technology frontier (DTF), where the high-technology frontier (HTF) and low-technology frontier (LTF) map onto innovative activities driven by technological opportunity and user needs. We propose that at the HTF, local search will dominate and firms will be influenced by HTF product introductions of similarly sized, successful firms. At the LTF, learning will occur across the DTF, vary by origin industry of the firm, and be affected by complementarities in routines and capabilities and market competition among firms. We test the proposed model of vicarious learning using panel data on new product introductions of 67 firms in the U.S. digital camera market in the 1990s. Findings generally support our proposed model of vicarious learning in this market. They show heterogeneity in vicarious learning across the technology frontier and firm characteristics---including the origin industry of target firms. Our results show that vicarious learning in new product introductions in converging markets---which includes both mimetic and nonmimetic learning---is similar in some ways, but different from more traditional markets. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of our findings for theories of organizational learning, new product development, and converging markets.

[1]  M. Wedel,et al.  Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations , 1997 .

[2]  Heather A. Haveman Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets , 1993 .

[3]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[4]  L. Burns,et al.  Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational networks. , 1993, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[5]  M. Tushman,et al.  On the Organizational Determinants of Technological Change: Towards a Sociology of Technological Evolution , 1992 .

[6]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Patterns of Competition: The Diffusion of a Market Position in Radio Broadcasting , 1996 .

[7]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty , 1997 .

[8]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Ugly Duckling No More: Pasts and Futures of Organizational Learning Research , 1996 .

[9]  Peter Green,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1996 .

[10]  Paul Geroski,et al.  INNOVATION, TECHNOLOGICAL OPPORTUNITY, AND MARKET STRUCTURE , 1990 .

[11]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Risk Reduction and Umbrella Branding , 1992 .

[12]  C. Moorman Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes , 1995 .

[13]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data: Preface , 1998 .

[14]  Robert A. Burgelman Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research , 1991 .

[15]  David B. Yoffie,et al.  Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence , 1997 .

[16]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Network Learning: The Effects of Partners' Heterogeneity of Experience on Corporate Acquisitions , 2002 .

[17]  David G. McKendrick,et al.  Global strategy and population‐level learning: the case of hard disk drives , 2001 .

[18]  G. Pisano The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[19]  E. Johnsen Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[20]  L. Fleming Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search Lee Fleming , 2001 .

[21]  H. Greve Managerial Cognition and the Mimetic Adoption of Market Positions: What You See is What You Do , 1998 .

[22]  Van de Ven,et al.  The Minnesota Innovation Research Program. , 1986 .

[23]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[24]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. , 1981 .

[25]  A. Gambardella,et al.  Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry , 1998 .

[26]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[27]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[28]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[29]  J. March,et al.  Organizational Learning , 2008 .

[30]  L. Argote Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[31]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[32]  S. Mezias,et al.  MANAGING DISCONTINUOUS CHANGE: A SIMULATION STUDY OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP , 1990 .

[33]  Ho Gyun Kim On the Evolutionary Theory of the Firm , 2009 .

[34]  Danny Miller,et al.  Nonconformity in Competitive Repertoires: A Sociological View of Markets , 1996 .

[35]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[36]  Raimar Richers The theory of economic development , 1961 .

[37]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  The Handbook of Industrial Innovation , 1994 .

[38]  M. Kamien,et al.  Optimal capital accumulation and durable goods production , 1977 .

[39]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[40]  Theresa K. Lant,et al.  Information Cuesand Decision Making , 2002 .

[41]  H. Thomas,et al.  Taxonomic Mental Models in Competitor Definition , 1990 .

[42]  Theresa K. Lant,et al.  Mimetic Learning and the Evolution of Organizational Populations , 2002 .

[43]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion: A Computer Simulation , 1997 .

[44]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of organizations , 1996 .

[45]  F. Malerba Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[46]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  Industrial Innovation: Success,Strategy, Trends , 1995 .

[47]  P. A. Gerosky,et al.  Innovation and the Evolution of Market Structure , 1990 .

[48]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[49]  Igor H.Ansoff Strategic Management , 1979 .

[50]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  How strategists really think. Tapping the power of analogy. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[51]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Love Thy Neighbor? Differentiation and Agglomeration in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898-1990 , 1997 .

[52]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  CRASH TEST WITHOUT DUMMIES: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING FROM FAILURE EXPERIENCE IN THE U.S. COMMERCIAL BANKING INDUSTRY, 1984-1998. , 2000 .

[53]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change , 1995 .

[54]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[55]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Economic Sources of Inventive Activity , 1962, The Journal of Economic History.

[56]  Pamela R. Haunschild Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity , 1993 .

[57]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[58]  S. Mezias,et al.  The three faces of corporate renewal: institution, revolution, and evolution , 1993 .

[59]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[60]  L. Argote,et al.  The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings , 1990 .

[61]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Learning from Complexity: Effects of Prior Accidents and Incidents on Airlines' Learning , 2002 .

[62]  Danny Miller NONCONFORMITY IN COMPETITIVE REPERTOIRES. , 1995 .

[63]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[64]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Research on the management of innovation : the Minnesota studies , 1991 .

[65]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  When Do Interlocks Matter?: Alternate Sources of Information and Interlock Influence , 1998 .

[66]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Localized Competition and Organizational Failure in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898-1990 , 1992 .

[67]  W. Ocasio TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[68]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .

[69]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Innovations as Catalysts for Organizational Change: Shifts in Organizational Cognition and Search , 2000 .

[70]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change , 1994 .

[71]  Douglas Gale,et al.  Information Revelation and Strategic Delay in a Model of Investment , 1994 .

[72]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Making the Next Move: How Experiential and Vicarious Learning Shape the Locations of Chains' Acquisitions , 2000 .