Impact of the resolution of brain parcels on connectome-wide association studies in fMRI

A recent trend in functional magnetic resonance imaging is to test for association of clinical disorders with every possible connection between selected brain parcels. We investigated the impact of the resolution of functional brain parcels, ranging from large-scale networks to local regions, on a mass univariate general linear model (GLM) of connectomes. For each resolution taken independently, the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure controlled the false-discovery rate (FDR) at nominal level on realistic simulations. However, the FDR for tests pooled across all resolutions could be inflated compared to the FDR within resolution. This inflation was severe in the presence of no or weak effects, but became negligible for strong effects. We thus developed an omnibus test to establish the overall presence of true discoveries across all resolutions. Although not a guarantee to control the FDR across resolutions, the omnibus test may be used for descriptive analysis of the impact of resolution on a GLM analysis, in complement to a primary analysis at a predefined single resolution. On three real datasets with significant omnibus test (schizophrenia, congenital blindness, motor practice), markedly higher rate of discovery were obtained at low resolutions, below 50, in line with simulations showing increase in sensitivity at such resolutions. This increase in discovery rate came at the cost of a lower ability to localize effects, as low resolution parcels merged many different brain regions together. However, with 30 or more parcels, the statistical effect maps were biologically plausible and very consistent across resolutions. These results show that resolution is a key parameter for GLM-connectome analysis with FDR control, and that a functional brain parcellation with 30 to 50 parcels may lead to an accurate summary of full connectome effects with good sensitivity in many situations.

[1]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Network-based statistic: Identifying differences in brain networks , 2010, NeuroImage.

[2]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[3]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Functional Brain Networks in Schizophrenia: A Review , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[4]  Jorge Sepulcre,et al.  Evidence from intrinsic activity that asymmetry of the human brain is controlled by multiple factors , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Which fMRI clustering gives good brain parcellations? , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[6]  R Chris Miall,et al.  The Time Course of Task-Specific Memory Consolidation Effects in Resting State Networks , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Resting-state functional MR imaging: a new window to the brain. , 2014, Radiology.

[8]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[9]  B. Efron SIMULTANEOUS INFERENCE : WHEN SHOULD HYPOTHESIS TESTING PROBLEMS BE COMBINED? , 2008, 0803.3863.

[10]  Tianzi Jiang,et al.  Functional Connectivity Density in Congenitally and Late Blind Subjects. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[12]  Habib Benali,et al.  Partial correlation for functional brain interactivity investigation in functional MRI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[13]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A method for functional network connectivity among spatially independent resting-state components in schizophrenia , 2008, NeuroImage.

[14]  Emiliano Macaluso,et al.  Images-based suppression of unwanted global signals in resting-state functional connectivity studies. , 2009, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  P. Royston A Toolkit for Testing for Non‐Normality in Complete and Censored Samples , 1993 .

[16]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Dealing with the shortcomings of spatial normalization: Multi‐subject parcellation of fMRI datasets , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[17]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[18]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Connectivity differences in brain networks , 2012, NeuroImage.

[19]  Edwin M. Robertson,et al.  The Resting Human Brain and Motor Learning , 2009, Current Biology.

[20]  N. Tzourio,et al.  Functional Mapping of the Human Brain , 1993 .

[21]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Schizophrenia, neuroimaging and connectomics , 2012, NeuroImage.

[22]  John M. Allman,et al.  A framework for interpreting functional networks in schizophrenia , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[23]  Patric Hagmann,et al.  Comparing connectomes across subjects and populations at different scales , 2013, NeuroImage.

[24]  A. Mechelli,et al.  Dysconnectivity in schizophrenia: Where are we now? , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[25]  Jean-Philippe Thiran,et al.  Improved statistical evaluation of group differences in connectomes by screening–filtering strategy with application to study maturation of brain connections between childhood and adolescence , 2015, NeuroImage.

[26]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Whole-brain anatomical networks: Does the choice of nodes matter? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[27]  Chunshui Yu,et al.  Whole brain functional connectivity in the early blind. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  Pierre Bellec,et al.  Mining the Hierarchy of Resting-State Brain Networks: Selection of Representative Clusters in a Multiscale Structure , 2013, 2013 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging.

[29]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Generation and Evaluation of a Cortical Area Parcellation from Resting-State Correlations. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[31]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  The pipeline system for Octave and Matlab (PSOM): a lightweight scripting framework and execution engine for scientific workflows , 2012, Front. Neuroinform..

[32]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Animal: Validation and Applications of Nonlinear Registration-Based Segmentation , 1997, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[33]  R Cameron Craddock,et al.  A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[34]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Multi-level bootstrap analysis of stable clusters in resting-state fMRI , 2009, NeuroImage.

[35]  Katie L. McMahon,et al.  A multivariate distance-based analytic framework for connectome-wide association studies , 2014, NeuroImage.

[36]  Habib Benali,et al.  Regions, systems, and the brain: Hierarchical measures of functional integration in fMRI , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[37]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[38]  Christian Windischberger,et al.  Toward discovery science of human brain function , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  O. Tervonen,et al.  Neuroglial Plasticity at Striatal Glutamatergic Synapses in Parkinson's Disease , 2011, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[40]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Applications of random field theory to functional connectivity , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[41]  T. Milner,et al.  Functionally Specific Changes in Resting-State Sensorimotor Networks after Motor Learning , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Network modelling methods for FMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[43]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Characterizing thalamo-cortical disturbances in schizophrenia and bipolar illness. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  New Results - Which fMRI clustering gives good brain parcellations? , 2014 .

[45]  Habib Benali,et al.  Identification of large-scale networks in the brain using fMRI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[46]  M. Fox,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[47]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Spatially constrained hierarchical parcellation of the brain with resting-state fMRI , 2013, NeuroImage.

[48]  Tianzi Jiang,et al.  The Development of Visual Areas Depends Differently on Visual Experience , 2013, PloS one.

[49]  C. Anderson,et al.  Quantitative Methods for Current Environmental Issues , 2005 .

[50]  R. Cameron Craddock,et al.  Clinical applications of the functional connectome , 2013, NeuroImage.

[51]  Kuncheng Li,et al.  Altered functional connectivity in early Alzheimer's disease: A resting‐state fMRI study , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[52]  Julien Doyon,et al.  Maintaining vs. enhancing motor sequence memories: Respective roles of striatal and hippocampal systems , 2015, NeuroImage.

[53]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies , 2011, NeuroImage.

[54]  G. Vandewalle,et al.  Functional specialization for auditory–spatial processing in the occipital cortex of congenitally blind humans , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.