Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for two-phase flow in the vicinity of the repository in the 1996 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: undisturbed conditions

Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results obtained in the 1996 performance assessment (PA) for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) are presented for two-phase flow in the vicinity of the repository under disturbed conditions resulting from drilling intrusions. Techniques based on Latin hypercube sampling, examination of scatterplots, stepwise regression analysis, partial correlation analysis and rank transformations are used to investigate brine inflow, gas generation repository pressure, brine saturation and brine and gas outflow. Of the variables under study, repository pressure and brine flow from the repository to the Culebra Dolomite are potentially the most important in PA for the WIPP. Subsequent to a drilling intrusion repository pressure was dominated by borehole permeability and generally below the level (i.e., 8 MPa) that could potentially produce spallings and direct brine releases. Brine flow from the repository to the Culebra Dolomite tended to be small or nonexistent with its occurrence and size also dominated by borehole permeability.

[1]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Results Obtained in the 1996 Performance Assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant , 1998 .

[2]  M. G. Marietta,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results obtained in the 1992 performance assessment for the waste isolation pilot plant , 1996 .

[3]  R. Iman,et al.  The Use of the Rank Transform in Regression , 1979 .

[4]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Radionuclide transport in the vicinity of the repository and associated complementary cumulative distribution functions in the 1996 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  J. Kleijnen,et al.  Statistical analyses of scatterplots to identify important factors in large-scale simulations, 2: robustness of techniques , 1999 .

[6]  T. W. Thompson,et al.  Description and evaluation of a mechanistically based conceptual model for spall , 1997 .

[7]  Ronald L. Iman,et al.  A Modern Approach To Statistics , 1983 .

[8]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for gas and brine migration at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: permeable shaft without panel seals , 1997 .

[9]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Conceptual structure of the 1996 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Characterization of subjective uncertainty in the 1996 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Direct releases to the surface and associated complementary cumulative distribution functions in the 1996 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: direct brine release , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Direct releases to the surface and associated complementary cumulative distribution functions in the 1996 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: cuttings, cavings and spallings , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for gas and brine migration at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: Permeable shaft with panel seals , 1996 .

[14]  Ronald L. Iman,et al.  FORTRAN 77 program and user's guide for the calculation of partial correlation and standardized regression coefficients , 1985 .

[15]  M. G. Marietta,et al.  Computational implementation of a systems prioritization methodology for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: a preliminary example , 1996 .

[16]  J. W. Garner,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results obtained in a preliminary performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant , 1993 .

[17]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for gas and brine migration at the waste isolation pilot plant : fully consolidated shaft , 1996 .

[18]  M. G. Marietta,et al.  Effect of alternative conceptual models in a preliminary performance assessment for the waste isolation pilot plant , 1995 .

[19]  F. D. Hansen,et al.  Review and perspectives on spallings release models in the 1996 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[20]  J. C. Helton,et al.  Statistical Analyses of Scatterplots to Identify Important Factors in Large-Scale Simulations, 1: Review and Comparison of Techniques , 1999 .

[21]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal , 1993 .

[22]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Representation of two-phase flow in the vicinity of the repository in the 1996 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Preliminary comparison with 40 CFR Part 191, Subpart B for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, December 1991. Volume 4, Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results , 1992 .