Redundancy gain in the stop-signal paradigm: implications for the locus of coactivation in simple reaction time.

The authors carried out 2 experiments designed to cast light on the locus of redundancy gain in simple visual reaction time by using a stop-signal paradigm. In Experiment 1, the authors found that single visual stimuli were more easily inhibited than double visual stimuli by an acoustic stop signal. This result is in keeping with the idea that redundancy gain occurs prior to the ballistic stage of the stop-signal task. In Experiment 2, the authors found that the response to an acoustic go signal was more easily inhibited by a double than by a single visual stop signal. This result provides conclusive evidence for a redundancy gain in the stop process--in a process that does not involve a motor response but rather its inhibition.

[1]  G. Logan,et al.  In search of the point of no return: the control of response processes. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  C. A. Marzi,et al.  Spatial summation across the vertical meridian in hemianopics: A test of blindsight , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  G. Logan On the ability to inhibit thought and action , 1984 .

[4]  J R Simon,et al.  Processing symbolic information from a visual display: interference from an irrelevant directional cue. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  R. Wallace,et al.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  H Colonius,et al.  Modeling the redundant signals effect by specifying the hazard function , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  M Giray,et al.  Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  G R Grice,et al.  Redundancy phenomena are affected by response requirements , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Redundancy gains and coactivation with two different targets: The problem of target preferences and the effects of display frequency , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Steven Yantis,et al.  An interactive race model of divided attention. , 1991 .

[12]  G. Logan,et al.  On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  I. Franks,et al.  A horse race between independent processes : Evidence for a phantom point of no return in the preparation of a speeded motor response , 1997 .

[14]  A. H. C. Heijden,et al.  Parallel processing of redundant targets in simple visual search tasks , 1983, Psychological research.

[15]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Fate of neglected targets: a chronometric analysis of redundant target effects in the bisected brain. , 1995 .

[16]  V. Lollo On the relationship between stimulus intensity and duration of visible persistence. , 1984 .

[17]  J Miller,et al.  Effects of stimulus duration and intensity on simple reaction time and response force. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  J Miller,et al.  Absence of coactivation in the motor component: evidence from psychophysiological measures of target detection. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  S Yantis,et al.  Dividing attention between color and shape: Evidence of coactivation , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  E. G. J. Eijkman,et al.  Distributions of simple RT with single and double stimuli , 1977 .

[21]  Hans Colonius,et al.  Intersensory facilitation in the motor component? , 1987 .

[22]  G. Tassinari,et al.  Influence of spatial stimulus-response compatibility on reaction time of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized light stimuli. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  E. Schröger,et al.  Speeded responses to audiovisual signal changes result from bimodal integration. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[24]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Comparing parallel and serial models: Theory and implementation. , 1980 .

[25]  D Reynolds,et al.  Time and event uncertainty in unisensory reaction time. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  M. Girelli,et al.  Neural Site of the Redundant Target Effect: Electrophysiological Evidence , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  D. Meyer,et al.  The point of no return in choice reaction time: controlled and ballistic stages of response preparation. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  B. Stein Neural mechanisms for synthesizing sensory information and producing adaptive behaviors , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  J Miller,et al.  Testing race models by estimating the smaller of two true mean or true median reaction times: An analysis of estimation bias , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  S Kornblum,et al.  Does motor programming necessitate response execution? , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  T. Carr,et al.  Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language , 1994 .

[32]  R S Nickerson,et al.  Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: energy summation or preparation enhancement? , 1973, Psychological review.

[33]  R Ulrich,et al.  Separate-activation models with variable base times: Testability and checking of cross-channel dependency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Hans Colonius,et al.  A Note on the Stop-Signal Paradigm, or How to Observe the Unobservable , 1990 .

[35]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  P A Mullin,et al.  Redundant-target detection and processing capacity: The problem of positional preferences , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  W. Schwarz,et al.  Diffusion, superposition, and the redundant-targets effect , 1994 .

[39]  M. W. van der Molen,et al.  On the synchrony of stopping motor responses and delaying heartbeats. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  David E. Irwin,et al.  On the Relations among Different Measures of Visible and Informational Persistence , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  D. Raab DIVISION OF PSYCHOLOGY: STATISTICAL FACILITATION OF SIMPLE REACTION TIMES* , 1962 .

[42]  R. Carpenter,et al.  Countermanding saccades in humans , 1999, Vision Research.

[43]  H Colonius,et al.  Measuring channel dependence in separate activation models , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  R. Ratcliff Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Use of a delayed signal to stop a visual reaction-time response. , 1966 .

[46]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[47]  J Theeuwes,et al.  The effects of location cuing on redundant-target processing , 1994, Psychological research.

[48]  W Schwarz,et al.  A new model to explain the redundant-signals effect , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.