Involvement of the parietal cortex in perceptual learning (Eureka effect): An interference approach using rTMS

The neural mechanisms underlying perceptual learning are still under investigation. Eureka effect is a form of rapid, long-lasting perceptual learning by which a degraded image, which appears meaningless when first seen, becomes recognizable after a single exposure to its undegraded version. We used online interference by focal 10-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to evaluate whether the parietal cortex (PC) is involved in Eureka effect, as suggested by neuroimaging data. RTMS of the PC did not affect recognition of degraded pictures when displayed 2s after the presentation of their undegraded version (learning phase). However, rTMS delivered over either right or left intraparietal sulcus simultaneously to the undegraded image presentation, disrupted identification of the degraded version of the same pictures when displayed 30 min after the learning phase. In contrast, recognition of degraded images was unaffected by rTMS over the vertex or by sham rTMS, or when rTMS of either PC was delivered 2s after the presentation of the undegraded image. Findings strongly support the hypothesis that both PC at the level of the intraparietal sulcus play a pivotal role in the Eureka effect particularly in consolidation processes, and contribute to elucidate the neural network underlying rapid perceptual learning.

[1]  D. Scott Perceptual learning. , 1974, Queen's nursing journal.

[2]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience – virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[3]  S. Hochstein,et al.  The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Cortical plasticity in perceptual learning demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  A. Fiorentini,et al.  Perceptual learning specific for orientation and spatial frequency , 1980, Nature.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context , 1997, Nature.

[7]  Li Zhaoping,et al.  Facilitation of bottom-up feature detection following rTMS-interference of the right parietal cortex , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  D. Schmidt,et al.  Neuronal correlates of encoding and retrieval in episodic memory during a paired-word association learning task: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Giancarlo Zito,et al.  Prefrontal and parietal cortex in human episodic memory: an interference study by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[10]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The Mind's Eye—Precuneus Activation in Memory-Related Imagery , 1995, NeuroImage.

[11]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning , 1997, Nature.

[12]  E. Gibson,et al.  Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1973 .

[13]  John C Gore,et al.  The role of the parietal cortex in visual feature binding , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Rapid visual learning in neurones of the primate temporal visual cortex. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[15]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Attenuating illusory binding with TMS of the right parietal cortex , 2007, NeuroImage.

[16]  Mark E Wheeler,et al.  Functional-anatomic correlates of remembering and knowing , 2004, NeuroImage.

[17]  R N Henson,et al.  Mechanisms of top-down facilitation in perception of visual objects studied by FMRI. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  The role of the angular gyrus in visual conjunction search investigated using signal detection analysis and transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  Florin Dolcos,et al.  Attention-related activity during episodic memory retrieval: a cross-function fMRI study , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  A. Treisman,et al.  Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions , 1995, Science.

[22]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction , 1995, Science.

[24]  Carmel Mevorach,et al.  Driven to less distraction: rTMS of the right parietal cortex reduces attentional capture in visual search. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.