Instability in memory phenomena: A common puzzle and a unifying explanation

In mixed lists, stable free recall advantages are observed for encoding conditions that are unusual, bizarre, or attract extensive individual item elaboration relative to more common encoding conditions; but this recall advantage is often eliminated or reversed in pure lists. We attempt to explain this ubiquitous memory puzzle with an item-order account that assumes that (1) free recall of unrelated lists depends on order and item information; (2) unusual items attract greater individual item-processing but disrupt order encoding regardless of list composition; and (3) list composition determines differences in order encoding across unusual and common items. We show that the item-order account provides a unifying explanation of five memory phenomena for which the requisite data exist. The account also successfully anticipates pure-list reversals, in which the standard mixed-list recall pattern is obtained in pure, structured lists, a finding that competing accounts cannot handle. Extending the item-order account to other “established” recall phenomena may prove fruitful.

[1]  Order information and free recall: Evaluating the item-order hypothesis , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[3]  R. L. Cohen,et al.  The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  11 – Models for Free Recall and Recognition1 , 1970 .

[5]  N. Mulligan Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: Evidence from multiple recall tests , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[6]  J. S. Nairne The Loss of Positional Certainty in Long-Term Memory , 1992 .

[7]  S. Dewhurst,et al.  Emotionality, distinctiveness, and recollective experience , 2000 .

[8]  John Jonides,et al.  Images as Memory Aids: Is Bizarreness Helpful? , 1972 .

[9]  I. Fischler,et al.  Effects of Concreteness and Task Context on Recall of Prose Among Bilingual and Monolingual Speakers , 1989 .

[10]  Harry Lorayne,et al.  The Memory Book , 1974 .

[11]  D. J. Burns,et al.  The generation effect: a test between single- and multifactor theories. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Distinctiveness and the Mnemonic Benefits of Bizarre Imagery , 1987 .

[13]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Encoding and Retrieval Processes in Distinctiveness Effects: Toward an Integrative Framework , 2006 .

[14]  E. Tulving,et al.  Organization of memory. , 1973 .

[15]  J. Worthen,et al.  Tests of a Cognitive-Resource-Allocation Account of the Bizarreness Effect , 2000, The Journal of general psychology.

[16]  B. Underwood Attributes of Memory , 1983 .

[17]  George Mandler Input Variables and Output Strategies in Free Recall of Categorized Lists , 1969 .

[18]  K. A. Wollen,et al.  Bizarreness versus interaction of mental images as determinants of learning , 1972 .

[19]  J. Hall,et al.  Learning as a function of word-frequency. , 1954, The American journal of psychology.

[20]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  More on Recognition Failure of Recallable Words: Implications for Generation Recognition Models. , 1978 .

[21]  R. Merry Image Bizarreness in Incidental Learning , 1980 .

[22]  J. Worthen,et al.  Distinctiveness and memory. , 2006 .

[23]  K. A. Wollen,et al.  Bizarreness and the Imagery Multiprocess Model , 1987 .

[24]  Marcel Kinsbourne,et al.  The mechanism of the word-frequency effect on recognition memory , 1974 .

[25]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  The Enigma of Organization and Distinctiveness , 1993 .

[26]  Daniel J. Burns,et al.  The effects of generation on item and order retention in immediate and delayed recall , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[27]  E. Hirshman,et al.  Perceptual interference improves explicit memory but does not enhance data-driven processing. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  L. Cuddy,et al.  Temporal contrast and the word frequency effect. , 1979, Canadian journal of psychology.

[29]  A. Thapar,et al.  Effects of Generation on Memory for Order , 1998 .

[30]  James V. Hinrichs,et al.  A two-process memory-strength theory for judgment of recency. , 1970 .

[31]  D L Nelson,et al.  What is this thing called frequency? , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[32]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Models Of Human Memory , 1970 .

[33]  B. Underwood,et al.  Meaningfulness and verbal learning , 1960 .

[34]  D. G. MacKay,et al.  Does emotion help or hinder immediate memory? Arousal versus priority-binding mechanisms. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  Rossana De Beni,et al.  Some conditions for the occurrence of the bizarreness effect in free recall , 1985 .

[36]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Gilles O. Einstein,et al.  Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual-item and relational processing. , 1980 .

[38]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  The Generation Effect: Support for a Two-Factor Theory , 1988 .

[39]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  A contextual account of the generation effect: A three-factor theory ☆ , 1988 .

[40]  H. Roediger Relativity of remembering: why the laws of memory vanished. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[41]  W. Kintsch Learning, memory, and conceptual processes , 1970 .

[42]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon , 1978 .

[43]  S R Schmidt Effects of humor on sentence memory. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  R A Chechile,et al.  Incongruous item generation effects: a multiple-cue perspective. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  N. Mulligan The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on implicit memory, explicit memory, and memory for source. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Toward a generate/recognize model of performance on direct and indirect tests of memory ☆ , 1990 .

[47]  J. Deese Frequency of Usage and Number of Words in Free Recall: The Role of Association , 1960 .

[48]  James S. Nairne,et al.  Separating item and order information through process dissociation , 2004 .

[49]  George Mandler,et al.  Seriation: Development of serial order in free recall. , 1969 .

[50]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[51]  A. W. Melton,et al.  Coding Processes in Human Memory. , 1973 .

[52]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Study-phase processing and the word frequency effect in recognition memory. , 1984 .

[53]  Lnnny L. Jecosy On Interpreting the Effects of Repetition : Solving a Problem Versus Remembering a Solution , 2010 .

[54]  Johannes Engelkamp,et al.  Categorical-relational and order-relational information in memory for subject-performed and experimenter-performed actions. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[55]  K. A. Wollen,et al.  Bizarreness and recall , 1981 .

[56]  Alicia J. Knoedler,et al.  The shift from recency to primacy with increasing delay. , 1999 .

[57]  R M Shiffrin,et al.  Retrieval strategies in recall of natural categories and categorized lists. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Explorations in Cognition , 1975 .

[59]  B. Murdock,et al.  Memory for Serial Order , 1989 .

[60]  Courtney C. Dornburg,et al.  Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: Implications for distinctiveness , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[61]  O. Tzeng A precedence effect in the processing of verbal information. , 1976, The American journal of psychology.

[62]  Patricia A. de Winstanley,et al.  Generation Effects and the Lack Thereof: The Role of Transfer-appropriate Processing , 1996 .

[63]  H. Eichenbaum Hippocampus Cognitive Processes and Neural Representations that Underlie Declarative Memory , 2004, Neuron.

[64]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Bizarre imagery as an effective memory aid: The importance of distinctiveness. , 1986 .

[65]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Modulation of environmental reinstatement effects through encoding strategies. , 1989, The American journal of psychology.

[66]  The item-order hypothesis reconsidered: The role of order information in free recall , 2003, Psychological research.

[67]  R. R. Hunt,et al.  The role of nonsemantic information in memory: Orthographic distinctiveness effects on retention , 1980 .

[68]  N. Mulligan Perceptual Interference and Memory for Order , 2000 .

[69]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  THE ROLE OF ORDER INFORMATION IN FREE RECALL : APPLICATION TO THE WORD-FREQUENCY EFFECT , 1996 .

[70]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Order information and retrieval distinctiveness: recall of common versus bizarre material. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[71]  S. Ebenholtz,et al.  The Process of Free Recall: Evidence for Non-Associative Factors in Acquisition and Retention , 1962 .

[72]  K. A. Wollen,et al.  Sentence cuing and the effectiveness of bizarre imagery. , 1981 .

[73]  D L Nelson,et al.  The ties that bind what is known to the recall of what is new , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[74]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  Design controversies and the generation effect: Support for an item-order hypothesis , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[75]  M. Palij,et al.  An investigation of paradoxical memory effects , 1989 .

[76]  John Brown,et al.  Recall and Recognition , 1976 .

[77]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  Sensory factors in memory for subject-performed tasks , 1997 .

[78]  V. Gregg Word frequency, recognition and recall. , 1976 .

[79]  S. R. Schmidt,et al.  Can we have a distinctive theory of memory? , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[80]  Robert R. Hoffman,et al.  Bizarreness as a nonessential variable in mnemonic imagery: A confirmation , 1976 .

[81]  M. McDaniel,et al.  The bizarreness effect: it's not surprising, it's complex. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[82]  W. Estes,et al.  Item and order information in short-term memory: Evidence for multilevel perturbation processes. , 1981 .

[83]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Generate–Sometimes Recognize, Sometimes Not ☆ ☆☆ , 1999 .

[84]  L. Cermak,et al.  Improving Your Memory , 1976 .

[85]  Vernon H. Gregg,et al.  Recall of common and uncommon words from pure and mixed lists , 1980 .

[86]  Michael P. Toglia,et al.  Recall and Use of Serial Position Information. , 1976 .

[87]  A. H. Fuchs,et al.  Recall for order and content of serial word lists in short-term memory. , 1969 .

[88]  G. Einstein,et al.  Relational and item-specific information in memory , 1981 .

[89]  N. Mulligan Word frequency and memory: Effects on absolute versus relative order memory and on item memory versus order memory , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[90]  E. Tulving,et al.  Memory and Verbal Learning , 1970 .

[91]  E. Tulving,et al.  Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words , 1966 .

[92]  N. Kroll,et al.  Visual imagery mnemonics: Common vs. bizarre mental images , 1976 .

[93]  Peter Herriot,et al.  Attributes of Memory , 1974 .

[94]  D L Nelson,et al.  Effects of implicit memory on explicit recall: Set size and word-frequency effects , 1995, Psychological research.

[95]  P A de Winstanley,et al.  Generation effects and the lack thereof: the role of transfer-appropriate processing. , 1996, Memory.

[96]  J. S. Nairne The mnemonic value of perceptual identification. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[97]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal. , 1987 .

[98]  D C LeCompte,et al.  Role of study strategy in recall of mixed lists of common and rare words. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[99]  D J Burns The item-order distinction and the generation effect: the importance of order information in long-term memory. , 1996, The American journal of psychology.

[100]  Aaron S. Benjamin,et al.  Predicting and postdicting the effects of word frequency on memory , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[101]  N. Mulligan The generation effect: Dissociating enhanced item memory and disrupted order memory , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[102]  R. L. Cohen,et al.  On the generality of some memory laws , 1981 .

[103]  J Engelkamp,et al.  Item and order information in subject-performed tasks and experimenter-performed tasks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[104]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Effects of word frequency on individual-item and serial order retention: Tests of the order-encoding view , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[105]  N. Mulligan,et al.  The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[106]  I. Neath Human Memory: An Introduction to Research, Data, and Theory , 1997 .

[107]  R. White Memory for events after twenty years , 2002 .

[108]  C. Douglas Wetzel,et al.  Temporal coding in verbal information processing. , 1979 .