Relevance of Whitnall's tubercle and auditory meatus in diagnosing exclusions during skull-photo superimposition.

Video vision mixer based skull-photo superimposition is a popular method for identifying skulls retrieved from unidentified human remains. A report on the reliability of the superimposition method suggested increased failure rates of 17.3 to 32% to exclude and 15 to 20% to include skulls while using related and unrelated face photographs. Such raise in failures prompted an analysis of the methods employed for the research. The protocols adopted for assessing the reliability are seen to vary from those suggested by the practitioners in the field. The former include overlaying the skull- and face-images on the basis of morphology by relying on anthropometric landmarks on the front plane of the face-images and evaluating the goodness of match depending on mix-mode images; the latter consist of orienting the skull considering landmarks on both the eye and ear planes of the face- and skull-images and evaluating the match utilizing images seen in wipe-mode in addition to those in mix-mode. Superimposition of a skull with face-images of five living individuals in two sets of experiments, one following the procedure described for the research on reliability and the other applying the methods suggested by the practitioners has shown that overlaying the images on the basis of morphology depending on the landmarks on the front plane alone and assessing the match in mix-mode fails to exclude the skull. However, orienting the skull relying on the relationship between the anatomical landmarks on the skull- and face-images such as Whitnall's tubercle and exocanthus in the front (eye) plane and the porion and tragus in the rear (ear) plane as well as assessing the match using wipe-mode images enables excluding that skull while superimposing with the same set of face-images.

[1]  Y. Alakoç,et al.  The identification of a dismembered human body: a multidisciplinary approach. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[2]  D Austin-Smith,et al.  The reliability of skull/photograph superimposition in individual identification. , 1994, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  G J Maat The positioning and magnification of faces and skulls for photographic superimposition. , 1989, Forensic science international.

[4]  Cristina Cattaneo,et al.  Personal Identification of Cadavers and Human Remains , 2006 .

[5]  W. M. Krogman The human skeleton in forensic medicine. I. , 1963, Postgraduate medicine.

[6]  Karen Ramey Burns,et al.  Forensic Anthropology Training Manual , 2006 .

[7]  P. Chandra Sekharan The Problems of Positioning Skulls for Video Superimposition Technique , 1989 .

[8]  Roxana Ferllini,et al.  Forensic Anthropology: Case Studies from Europe , 2007 .

[9]  J J McKenna A method of orientation of skull and camera for use in forensic photographic investigation. , 1988, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  G. J. Srinivasan,et al.  Cranio-facial morphanalysis: a new method for enhancing reliability while identifying skulls by photo superimposition. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[11]  L. Farkas,et al.  Facial asymmetry in healthy North American Caucasians. An anthropometrical study. , 1981, The Angle orthodontist.

[12]  D Austin,et al.  Video superimposition at the C.A. Pound Laboratory 1987 to 1992. , 1999, Journal of forensic sciences.

[13]  L. Farkas Anthropometry of the head and face in medicine , 1981 .

[14]  J. Clement,et al.  Craniofacial identification by computer-mediated superimposition. , 2006, The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology.

[15]  R. Helmer,et al.  Vereinfachte Schädelidentifizierung nach dem Superprojektionsverfahren mit Hilfe einer Video-Anlage , 1977, Zeitschrift für Rechtsmedizin.

[16]  Alice M. Brues,et al.  Identification of Skeletal Remains , 1958 .

[17]  Gian Luca Marella,et al.  A New Experimental Approach to Computer-Aided Face/Skull Identification in Forensic Anthropology , 2006, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[18]  Nik Hassan,et al.  Computer Aided Video Superimposition Device: A Novel Contribution to Skull Based Identification in Malaysia , 2010 .

[19]  John Glaister,et al.  Medico-Legal Aspects of the Ruxton Case , 1938, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[20]  I. Bajnóczky,et al.  A new approach to computer-aided comparison of skull and photograph , 2005, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[21]  Eugénia Cunha,et al.  Forensic anthropology and medicine : complementary sciences from recovery to cause of death , 2006 .

[22]  Chai Dong-Sheng,et al.  A study on the standard for forensic anthropologic identification of skull-image superimposition. , 1989 .

[23]  D. Ranson,et al.  CRANIOFACIAL IDENTIFICATION IN FORENSIC MEDICINE , 1998 .

[24]  M. Yoshino,et al.  FACIAL IDENTIFICATION |Skull-photo Superimposition , 2000 .

[25]  G. D. Dalitz,et al.  Video Superimposition of Skulls and Photographic Portraits—A New Aid to Identification , 1986 .

[26]  Carl N Stephan,et al.  The Placement of the Human Eyeball and Canthi in Craniofacial Identification , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[27]  D. Ubelaker A History of Smithsonian-FBI Collaboration in Forensic Anthropology, Especially in Regard to Facial Imagery , 2000 .

[28]  Oscar Cordón,et al.  An experimental study on the applicability of evolutionary algorithms to craniofacial superimposition in forensic identification , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[29]  David Glassman Methods of Superimposition , 2000 .

[30]  Max M. Houck,et al.  Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences , 2013 .

[31]  S. Seta,et al.  Current research and case work activities of criminalistics in Japan. , 1996, Forensic science international.

[32]  G M Gordon,et al.  An investigation into the accuracy and reliability of skull-photo superimposition in a South African sample. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[33]  Douglas H. Ubelaker,et al.  Computer-Assisted Photographic Superimposition , 1992 .

[34]  W. M. Rogers,et al.  The influence of asymmetry of the muscles of mastication upon the bones of the face , 1958 .

[35]  T. Catterick,et al.  Facial measurements as an aid to recognition , 1992 .

[36]  J. Rhine,et al.  Thickness of facial tissues in American blacks. , 1980, Journal of forensic sciences.

[37]  Caroline Wilkinson,et al.  Forensic Facial Reconstruction , 2004 .

[38]  S. Sivaram,et al.  Identity from skeleton — A case study , 1975 .

[39]  M Y Işcan,et al.  Forensic anthropology in Latin America. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[40]  Christopher R Forrest,et al.  International Anthropometric Study of Facial Morphology in Various Ethnic Groups/Races , 2005, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[41]  S Miyasaka,et al.  Computer-assisted facial image identification system using a 3-D physiognomic range finder. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[42]  Frank Ramsthaler,et al.  Superimposition technique for skull identification with Afloat® software , 2010, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[43]  O. Grüner Die rechtsmedizinische Identifizierung — Bedeutung und Beweiswert — , 2005, Zeitschrift für Rechtsmedizin.

[44]  M. Işcan,et al.  Victim of a dictatorial regime: identification of Mr. Roberto Gomensoro Josman. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[45]  S Miyasaka,et al.  Evaluation of anatomical consistency in craniofacial superimposition images. , 1995, Forensic science international.

[46]  M Y Işcan,et al.  Skeletal remains of Dr. Eugenio Antonio Berríos Sagredo. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[47]  K. Taylor Forensic Art and Illustration , 2000 .

[48]  T. Fenton,et al.  Skull‐Photo Superimposition and Border Deaths: Identification Through Exclusion and the Failure to Exclude * , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[49]  Patrick A. Fitzhorn,et al.  A methodology for near-optimal computational superimposition of two-dimensional digital facial photographs and three-dimensional cranial surface meshes. , 1991, Journal of forensic sciences.

[50]  Paul T. Jayaprakash,et al.  Conceptual transitions in methods of skull-photo superimposition that impact the reliability of identification: a review. , 2015, Forensic science international.

[51]  P X Iten,et al.  Identification of skulls by video superimposition. , 1987, Journal of forensic sciences.

[52]  T D Koelmeyer Videocamera superimposition and facial reconstruction as an aid to identification , 1982, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[53]  Mehmet Yaşar İşcan,et al.  Forensic analysis of the skull : craniofacial analysis, reconstruction, and identification , 1993 .