Exploring the deep-level reasoning questions effect during vicarious learning among eighth to eleventh graders in the domains of computer literacy and Newtonian physics

This paper tested the deep-level reasoning questions effect in the domains of computer literacy between eighth and tenth graders and Newtonian physics for ninth and eleventh graders. This effect claims that learning is facilitated when the materials are organized around questions that invite deep-reasoning. The literature indicates that vicarious learners in college student populations show greater pretest to posttest learning gains when presented with deep-level reasoning questions before each content sentence, than when deep-level questions are omitted, or when learners interact with an intelligent tutoring system. This effect holds for vicarious learners across grade levels and domains.

[1]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Overhearing Dialogues and Monologues in Virtual Tutoring Sessions: Effects on Questioning and Vicarious Learning , 2000 .

[2]  Danielle S McNamara,et al.  iSTART: Interactive strategy training for active reading and thinking , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[3]  W. Baggett,et al.  Question-driven Explanatory Reasoning , 1996 .

[4]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Child's Conception of Number , 1953 .

[5]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? , 1997 .

[6]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents in Multimedia Educational Environments: Effects of Agent Properties, Picture Features, and Redundancy , 2002 .

[7]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional Design in Technical Areas. Australian Education Review, No. 43. , 1999 .

[8]  Richard E. Mayer 14. Using illustrations to promote constructivist learning from science text , 2002 .

[9]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[10]  Heather H. Mitchell,et al.  AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[11]  J. Piaget Six Psychological Studies , 1967 .

[12]  Richard Cox,et al.  Why observing a dialogue may benefit learning , 1998, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[13]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[14]  B. Rosenshine,et al.  Teaching Students to Generate Questions: A Review of the Intervention Studies , 1996 .

[15]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned , 1995 .

[16]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  The Deep-Level-Reasoning-Question Effect: The Role of Dialogue and Deep-Level-Reasoning Questions During Vicarious Learning , 2006 .

[17]  R. Cox,et al.  Vicarious learning from dialogue and discourse , 1999 .

[18]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Inference in text understanding , 2017 .

[19]  J. Piaget The Child's Conception of Number , 1953 .

[20]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Promoting Constructive Activities that Support Vicarious Learning During Computer-Based Instruction , 2006 .

[21]  A. Graesser,et al.  Question Asking During Tutoring , 1994 .

[22]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[23]  A. Silverstein The Developmental Psychology of Jean Piaget , 1965 .

[24]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional Design in Technical Areas , 1999 .

[25]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Constructing Knowledge from Dialog in an Intelligent Tutoring System: Interactive Learning, Vicarious Learning, and Pedagogical Agents , 2004 .

[26]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Natural Language Tutoring: A comparison of human tutors, computer tutors, and text , 2007 .

[27]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Vicarious Learning: Effects of Overhearing Dialog and Monologue-like Discourse in a Virtual Tutoring Session , 2003 .

[28]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  When Are Tutorial Dialogues More Effective Than Reading? , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Observing Tutorial Dialogues Collaboratively: Insights About Human Tutoring Effectiveness From Vicarious Learning , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[32]  Richard Cox,et al.  Vicarious learning from dialogue and discourse -- A controlled comparison , 1999 .

[33]  N. Rummel,et al.  Learning to Collaborate: An Instructional Approach to Promoting Collaborative Problem Solving in Computer-Mediated Settings , 2005 .

[34]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[35]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Teaching Tactics and Dialog in AutoTutor , 2001 .