The dynamics of energy demand: Change, rhythm and synchronicity

Abstract This paper lays out the relevance of the investigation of the underlying social dynamics and temporalities of energy demand for energy and social science research. Elements of a distinctive approach to researching the dynamics of energy demand are outlined, starting from the observation that demand is an outcome of what energy is for. Energy demand, it is argued, is a product of the vast array of interwoven social practices out of which the ordering of society is made. It is therefore necessary to understand how temporal patterns are already embedded in the social world in order to follow how energy use changes and varies over time. Three forms or categories of dynamic are discussed – change, rhythm and synchronicity – each providing a different way of approaching the relation between time, social practice and energy demand. In the course of discussion the increasing relevance of temporal patterning to both supply and demand-side policy and practice is made clear. In concluding further scope for a broadening of time-focused energy demand research is identified.

[1]  Gail Cooper,et al.  Air-Conditioning America: Engineers and the Controlled Environment, 1900-1960 , 1999 .

[2]  Wesley Longhofer,et al.  Elementary Forms of Religious Life , 2013 .

[3]  E. Zerubavel.  The Seven Day Circle: The History and Meaning of the Week , 1986 .

[4]  G. Walker.  Inequality, sustainability and capability: locating justice in social practice , 2013 .

[5]  Gordon Walker,et al.  What Is Energy For? Social Practice and Energy Demand , 2014 .

[6]  E. Shove.  Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change , 2010 .

[7]  T. Schatzki.  The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change , 2002 .

[8]  A. Wieczorek,et al.  Transitions towards sustainability through system innovation , 2005 .

[9]  Dale Southerton,et al.  `Squeezing Time' , 2003 .

[10]  E. Garnsey,et al.  The impact on energy consumption of daylight saving clock changes , 2010 .

[11]  Gerald Moore,et al.  Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life , 2005 .

[12]  Sam Brown,et al.  Transnational Transitions: The Diffusion and Integration of Mechanical Cooling , 2014 .

[13]  L. White,et al.  ENERGY AND THE EVOLUTION OF CULTURE , 1943 .

[14]  E. Shove.  Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality , 2003 .

[15]  Gert Spaargaren,et al.  Theories of practices: Agency, technology, and culture. Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order , 2011 .

[16]  B. Sørensen.  A History of Energy: Northern Europe from the Stone Age to the Present Day , 2011 .

[17]  Andreas Reckwitz.  Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[18]  E. Zerubavel.  Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life , 1981 .

[19]  C. Clastres.  Smart grids: Another step towards competition, energy security and climate change objectives , 2011 .

[20]  Mikko Jalas.  Busy, wise and idle time : a study of the temporalities of consumption in the environmental debate , 2006 .

[21]  R. Hitchings,et al.  Researching Air-Conditioning Addiction and Ways of Puncturing Practice: Professional Office Workers and the Decision to Go outside , 2011 .

[22]  Andrew McMeekin,et al.  International Review of Behaviour Change Initiatives , 2011 .

[23]  Barbara Adam,et al.  Time and Social Theory , 1990 .

[24]  F. Geels,et al.  Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways , 2010 .

[25]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  A Thousand Years of Energy Use in the United Kingdom , 1998 .

[26]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life , 2013 .

[27]  Andrew McMeekin,et al.  Sustainability transitions and final consumption: practices and socio-technical systems , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[28]  J. Urry.  The ‘System’ of Automobility , 2004 .

[29]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Air-conditioning Australian households: The impact of dynamic peak pricing , 2010 .

[30]  J. Widén,et al.  Constructing load profiles for household electricity and hot water from time-use data—Modelling approach and validation , 2009 .

[31]  Norbert Elias.  Time: An Essay , 1993 .

[32]  J. Torriti,et al.  Demand response experience in Europe: Policies, programmes and implementation , 2010 .

[33]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Peak electricity demand and social practice theories: Reframing the role of change agents in the energy sector , 2012 .

[34]  B. Sovacool.  What Are We Doing Here? Analyzing Fifteen Years of Energy Scholarship and Proposing a Social Science Research Agenda , 2014 .

[35]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Social implications of residential demand response in cool temperate climates , 2012 .

[36]  M. Jalas.  The Everyday Life Context of Increasing Energy Demands: Time Use Survey Data in a Decomposition Analysis , 2005 .

[37]  Harold Wilhite,et al.  Rethinking embodied knowledge and household consumption , 2014 .

[38]  Conor Harrison.  The historical–geographical construction of power: electricity in Eastern North Carolina , 2013 .

[39]  Dale Southerton,et al.  Habits, routines and temporalities of consumption: From individual behaviours to the reproduction of everyday practices , 2013 .

[40]  J. Widén,et al.  A high-resolution stochastic model of domestic activity patterns and electricity demand , 2010 .

[41]  Dale Southerton,et al.  Behavioural change and the temporal ordering of eating practices: a UK-Spain comparison. , 2012 .

[42]  Wendy Olsen,et al.  Changes in the Practice of Eating , 2007 .

[43]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  Individual and household interactions with energy systems: Toward integrated understanding , 2014 .

[44]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes , 2012 .