Ethics and defense agency funding: some considerations
暂无分享,去创建一个
Abstract The author, an anthropologist working in a military defense science and technology funding agency, offers four guidelines for social scientists for evaluating the ethical problems in defense funding opportunities. These guidelines address what social scientists need to know in order to evaluate the ethical risks involved in accepting defense funding: (1) the need to understand the code of ethics of social science organizations and their limits in dealing with ethical problems of new technologies; (2) the need to understand the implications of working in “classified” contexts; (3) the need to understand the funding program's goals and objectives; (4) the need to develop an ethical imagination about technological advances and research and develop an appropriately supportive environment for promoting ethical behavior in the scientific community.
[1] Philip Rieff. On intellectuals : theoretical studies, case studies , 1970 .
[2] Descriptors Educational,et al. Political Science Association , 2001 .
[3] Richard Fardon,et al. ANTHROPOLOGISTS AS SPIES , 2005 .
[4] Richard N. Adams,et al. The Rise And Fall Of Project Camelot , 1967 .
[5] Genevieve J. Knezo,et al. "Sensitive But Unclassified" and Other Federal Security Controls on Scientific and Technical Information: History and Current Controversy , 2003 .