Crime and Punishment: Are One-Shot, Two-Person Games Enough?

George Tsebelis argued in the March 1989 issue of this Review that decision theory is completely appropriate for analyzing games against nature but not appropriate for dissecting games against a rational opponent. Analysts who mistake a rational opponent for nature in constructing models commit what Tsebelis calls “the Robinson Crusoe fallacy.” In this controversy, William Bianco and Peter Ordeshook attack components of Tsebelis's argument. Bianco believes the model should be set up as an iterated, rather than a one-shot, game. Ordeshook feels that proper modeling cannot rely merely on two-person games and, in addition, he argues that Tsebelis commits some technical errors. In his reply, Tsebelis joins the issues and buttresses his original analysis.

[1]  George Tsebelis The Effect of Fines on Regulated Industries , 1991 .

[2]  Werner Güth,et al.  On Supergames and Folk Theorems: A Conceptual Discussion , 1991 .

[3]  George Tsebelis,et al.  Penalty has no Impact on Crime: , 1990 .

[4]  George Tsebelis,et al.  Are Sanctions Effective? , 1990 .

[5]  George Tsebelis Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics , 1990 .

[6]  J. Ferejohn,et al.  Bargaining in Legislatures , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[7]  George Tsebelis,et al.  The Abuse of Probability in Political Analysis: The Robinson Crusoe Fallacy , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[8]  Michael Bacharach,et al.  A theory of rational decision in games , 1987 .

[9]  E. Vandamme Stability and perfection of nash equilibria , 1987 .

[10]  Peter C. Ordeshook,et al.  Game Theory And Political Theory , 1987 .

[11]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information , 1986 .

[12]  R. Finn The Tax Compliance Game , 1986 .

[13]  Michael J. Graetz,et al.  The Tax Compliance Game: Toward an Interactive Theory of Law Enforcement , 1986 .

[14]  J. Friedman Game theory with applications to economics , 1986 .

[15]  Michael Waldman,et al.  Rational Expectations and the Limits of Rationality: An Analysis of Heterogeneity , 1983 .

[16]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Reputation and imperfect information , 1982 .

[17]  R. Myerson,et al.  Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Costs , 1982 .

[18]  H. Moulin Game theory for the social sciences , 1982 .

[19]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[20]  R. Aumann Survey of Repeated Games , 1981 .

[21]  Henry Hamburger,et al.  Games As Models of Social Phenomena , 1979 .

[22]  R. Myerson Refinements of the Nash equilibrium concept , 1978 .

[23]  Finn E. Kydland,et al.  Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans , 1977, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  J. Harsanyi Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium points , 1973 .

[25]  J. Harsanyi Oddness of the number of equilibrium points: A new proof , 1973 .

[26]  J. Friedman A Non-cooperative Equilibrium for Supergames , 1971 .

[27]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Games And Decisions , 1958 .