The Use of Portable Thermal Imaging for Estimating Deer Population Density in Forest Habitats

The reliability of deer population management could be improved with good density estimates, but current methods are either labour-intensive or suffer from uncertainties regarding accuracy. Visibility varies substantially in forests depending on stand type, age and understorey vegetation. In such conditions distance sampling would be an efficient estimation method, but observer disturbance often results in bias when the method is applied to deer. The performance of thermal imaging for estimating deer density by distance sampling was assessed in seven forest deer populations. Thermal imaging equipment can detect the long-wave energy radiated by natural objects, clearly revealing warm-bodied animals even if partly obscured by vegetation. Many more deer were detected at night using a thermal imager than along the same transect routes in daytime. Detection distances were correlated with visibility but were substantially longer than the average distances at which most animals were disturbed. Most deer were detected without causing prior disturbance. Densities were estimated with a coefficient of variation ranging from 10.2-28.4%. Precision depended on sampling effort and sample sizes obtained. A Monte Carlo simulation revealed a quadratic relationship between accuracy and visibility, with accuracy increasing with average visibility and a tendency for deer to select more open habitats within a forest. Under conditions that are likely to be typical of temperate forests (< 40% thicket and neutral selection, or < 70% thicket if thicket is avoided), accuracy was generally good and changed relatively little in relation to visibility and habitat selection. Likely sources of bias as well as alternatives to thermal imaging are discussed. It is concluded that the method would be suitable for estimating ungulate densities in forests with an adequate network of tracks.

[1]  H. Strandgaard Reliability of the Petersen Method Tested on a Roe-Deer Population , 1967 .

[2]  L. K. Halls,et al.  Browse Plants Yield Best in Forest Openings , 1968 .

[3]  R. Dzie̦ciolowski Roe deer census by pellet-group counts , 1976 .

[4]  D. McCullough,et al.  The George Reserve deer herd : population ecology of a K-selected species , 1980 .

[5]  L. Mech,et al.  An improved method of censusing deer in deciduous-coniferous forests , 1979 .

[6]  D. Davis,et al.  Estimating the numbers of wildlife populations , 1980 .

[7]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Statistical Evaluation of Remotely Sensed Thermal Data for Deer Census , 1980 .

[8]  D. McCullough Evaluation of Night Spotlighting as a Deer Study Technique , 1982 .

[9]  George F. Mattfeld,et al.  WHITE-TAILED DEER VISIBILITY AND BEHAVIOR ALONG FOREST ROADS , 1983 .

[10]  B. Staines,et al.  Habitat selection and impact of red ( Cervus elaphus L.) and roe ( Capreolus capreolus L.) deer in a Sitka spruce plantation , 1984 .

[11]  S. Harbo,et al.  Biases in aerial transect surveys for moose during may and june , 1985 .

[12]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Efficiency and Bias in Strip and Line Transect Sampling , 1985 .

[13]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  Precision of the change-in-ratio technique for deer population management , 1986 .

[14]  D. Scott,et al.  Habitat usage by red (Cervus elaphus) and roe (Capreolus capreolus) deer in a Scottish Sitka spruce plantation , 1990 .

[15]  T. Fuller Do pellet counts index white-tailed deer numbers and population change? , 1991 .

[16]  S. Harris,et al.  Handbook of British Mammals , 1996 .

[17]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations , 1995 .

[18]  L. Boitani,et al.  Spatial and Activity Patterns of Wild Boars in Tuscany, Italy , 1994 .

[19]  Stan Boutin,et al.  Finding Mammals Using Far-Infrared Thermal Imaging , 1994 .

[20]  J. Goszczyński,et al.  Numbers of red deer in the Słowiński National Park, Poland , 1995 .

[21]  S. Harris,et al.  Estimating the biomass of large mammalian herbivores in a tropical montane forest: a method of faecal counting that avoids assuming a 'steady state' system , 1995 .

[22]  R. Gill,et al.  Changes in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) population density in response to forest habitat succession , 1996 .

[23]  W. Newmark,et al.  Effects of a highway on large mammals in Mikumi National Park, Tanzania , 1996 .

[24]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  Estimating the minimum population size that allows a given annual number of mature red deer stags to be culled sustainably , 1996 .

[25]  B. Cargnelutti,et al.  Testing density estimators on a fallow deer population of known size , 1996 .

[26]  M. Heydon,et al.  Mousedeer densities in a tropical rainforest: the impact of selective logging , 1997 .