How contact patterns destabilize and modulate epidemic outbreaks

The spread of a contagious disease clearly depends on when infected individuals come into contact with susceptible ones. Such effects, however, have remained largely unexplored in the study of epidemic outbreaks. In particular, it remains unclear how the timing of contacts interacts with the latent and infectious stages of the disease. Here, we use real-world physical proximity data to study this interaction and find that the temporal statistics of actual human contact patterns (i) destabilize epidemic outbreaks and (ii) modulate the basic reproduction number R 0. We explain both observations by distinct aspects of the observed contact patterns. On the one hand, we find the destabilization of outbreaks to be caused by the temporal clustering of contacts leading to over-dispersed offspring distributions and increased probabilities of otherwise rare events (zero- and super-spreading). Notably, our analysis enables us to disentangle previously elusive sources of over-dispersion in empirical offspring distributions. On the other hand, we find the modulation of R 0 to be caused by a periodically varying contact rate. Both mechanisms are a direct consequence of the memory in contact behavior, and we showcase a generative process that reproduces these non-Markovian statistics. Our results point to the importance of including non-Markovian contact timings into studies of epidemic outbreaks.

[1]  Yan-bing Liu,et al.  Effects of network temporality on coevolution spread epidemics in higher-order network , 2022, J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci..

[2]  E. Lau,et al.  Estimating the latent period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). , 2021, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[3]  D. Fisman,et al.  Understanding why superspreading drives the COVID-19 pandemic but not the H1N1 pandemic , 2021, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[4]  Alain Barrat,et al.  Building surrogate temporal network data from observed backbones. , 2020, Physical review. E.

[5]  D. Brockmann,et al.  COVID-19 lockdown induces disease-mitigating structural changes in mobility networks , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  P. Klepac,et al.  Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts , 2020, The Lancet Global Health.

[7]  Arkadiusz Stopczynski,et al.  Interaction data from the Copenhagen Networks Study , 2019, Scientific Data.

[8]  P. Holme,et al.  Small inter-event times govern epidemic spreading on networks , 2019, Physical Review Research.

[9]  Srijan Sengupta,et al.  Toward epidemic thresholds on temporal networks: a review and open questions , 2019, Applied Network Science.

[10]  Ming Tang,et al.  Equivalence and its invalidation between non-Markovian and Markovian spreading dynamics on complex networks , 2019, Nature Communications.

[11]  V. Priesemann,et al.  Description of spreading dynamics by microscopic network models and macroscopic branching processes can differ due to coalescence. , 2019, Physical review. E.

[12]  Jiming Liu,et al.  Periodicity in Movement Patterns Shapes Epidemic Risk in Urban Environments , 2018, ArXiv.

[13]  Alain Barrat,et al.  Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts? , 2017, EPJ Data Science.

[14]  Joel C. Miller,et al.  Mathematics of Epidemics on Networks: From Exact to Approximate Models , 2017 .

[15]  Caroline O. Buckee,et al.  Comparing nonpharmaceutical interventions for containing emerging epidemics , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Marián Boguñá,et al.  Equivalence between Non-Markovian and Markovian Dynamics in Epidemic Spreading Processes. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[17]  Petter Holme,et al.  Modern temporal network theory: a colloquium , 2015, The European Physical Journal B.

[18]  Arkadiusz Stopczynski,et al.  Fundamental structures of dynamic social networks , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Julie Fournet,et al.  Data on face-to-face contacts in an office building suggest a low-cost vaccination strategy based on community linkers , 2014, Network Science.

[20]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Epidemic processes in complex networks , 2014, ArXiv.

[21]  Sune Lehmann,et al.  The Strength of Friendship Ties in Proximity Sensor Data , 2014, PloS one.

[22]  Ingo Scholtes,et al.  Causality-driven slow-down and speed-up of diffusion in non-Markovian temporal networks , 2013, Nature Communications.

[23]  P. V. Mieghem,et al.  Non-Markovian Infection Spread Dramatically Alters the Susceptible-Infected-Susceptible Epidemic Threshold in Networks , 2013 .

[24]  P. Holme,et al.  Predicting and controlling infectious disease epidemics using temporal networks , 2013, F1000prime reports.

[25]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Calling patterns in human communication dynamics , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  G. Chowell,et al.  Impact of weekday social contact patterns on the modeling of influenza transmission, and determination of the influenza latent period. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  Sergey N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Localization and Spreading of Diseases in Complex Networks , 2012, Physical review letters.

[28]  Lev Muchnik,et al.  Identifying influential spreaders in complex networks , 2010, 1001.5285.

[29]  Sune Lehmann,et al.  Link communities reveal multiscale complexity in networks , 2009, Nature.

[30]  J. Lloyd-Smith Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Negative Binomial Dispersion Parameter for Highly Overdispersed Data, with Applications to Infectious Diseases , 2007, PloS one.

[31]  P. E. Kopp,et al.  Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence , 2005, Nature.

[32]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[33]  M. Newman,et al.  Why social networks are different from other types of networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[34]  A L Lloyd,et al.  Destabilization of epidemic models with the inclusion of realistic distributions of infectious periods , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  T. Fearn The Jackknife , 2000 .

[36]  Erik Meijer,et al.  Delete-m Jackknife for Unequal m , 1999, Stat. Comput..

[37]  Huaiyu Zhu On Information and Sufficiency , 1997 .

[38]  B. Efron,et al.  The Jackknife: The Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. , 1983 .

[39]  G. Shedler,et al.  Simulation of Nonhomogeneous Poisson Processes by Thinning , 1979 .

[40]  Norman T. J. Bailey,et al.  Some Stochastic Models for Small Epidemics in Large Populations , 1964 .

[41]  B. Efron The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans , 1987 .

[42]  R. Watson,et al.  On the spread of a disease with gamma distributed latent and infectious periods , 1980 .