A Data-Driven Investigation on Surface Electromyography Based Clinical Assessment in Chronic Stroke

Background: Surface electromyography (sEMG) based robot-assisted rehabilitation systems have been adopted for chronic stroke survivors to regain upper limb motor function. However, the evaluation of rehabilitation effects during robot-assisted intervention relies on traditional manual assessments. This study aimed to develop a novel sEMG data-driven model for automated assessment. Method: A data-driven model based on a three-layer backpropagation neural network (BPNN) was constructed to map sEMG data to two widely used clinical scales, i.e., the Fugl–Meyer Assessment (FMA) and the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Twenty-nine stroke participants were recruited in a 20-session sEMG-driven robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation, which consisted of hand reaching and withdrawing tasks. The sEMG signals from four muscles in the paretic upper limbs, i.e., biceps brachii (BIC), triceps brachii (TRI), flexor digitorum (FD), and extensor digitorum (ED), were recorded before and after the intervention. Meanwhile, the corresponding clinical scales of FMA and MAS were measured manually by a blinded assessor. The sEMG features including Mean Absolute Value (MAV), Zero Crossing (ZC), Slope Sign Change (SSC), Root Mean Square (RMS), and Wavelength (WL) were adopted as the inputs to the data-driven model. The mapped clinical scores from the data-driven model were compared with the manual scores by Pearson correlation. Results: The BPNN, with 15 nodes in the hidden layer and sEMG features, i.e., MAV, ZC, SSC, and RMS, as the inputs to the model, was established to achieve the best mapping performance with significant correlations (r > 0.9, P < 0.001), according to the FMA. Significant correlations were also obtained between the mapped and manual FMA subscores, i.e., FMA-wrist/hand and FMA-shoulder/elbow, before and after the intervention (r > 0.9, P < 0.001). Significant correlations (P < 0.001) between the mapped and manual scores of MASs were achieved, with the correlation coefficients r = 0.91 at the fingers, 0.88 at the wrist, and 0.91 at the elbow after the intervention. Conclusion: An sEMG data-driven BPNN model was successfully developed. It could evaluate upper limb motor functions in chronic stroke and have potential application in automated assessment in post-stroke rehabilitation, once validated with large sample sizes. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02117089.

[1]  B. Dobkin Rehabilitation after Stroke , 2005 .

[2]  M. Brewer,et al.  Research Design and Issues of Validity , 2000 .

[3]  I. Laffont,et al.  Kinect-based assessment of proximal arm non-use after a stroke , 2018, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  K. Gnana Sheela,et al.  Review on Methods to Fix Number of Hidden Neurons in Neural Networks , 2013 .

[5]  A. Roli Artificial Neural Networks , 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[6]  V. P. Ramesh,et al.  Back propagation neural network based big data analytics for a stock market challenge , 2018, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods.

[7]  Zhizeng Luo,et al.  SEMG-based multifeatures and predictive model for knee-joint-angle estimation , 2019 .

[8]  Yongping Zheng,et al.  The Effects of Upper-Limb Training Assisted with an Electromyography-Driven Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Robotic Hand on Chronic Stroke , 2017, Front. Neurol..

[9]  Qi Li,et al.  An Auditory-Based Feature Extraction Algorithm for Robust Speaker Identification Under Mismatched Conditions , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[10]  Frank E. Harrell,et al.  Prediction models need appropriate internal, internal-external, and external validation. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  J. Evans Straightforward Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1995 .

[12]  E. A. Susanto,et al.  The effects of post-stroke upper-limb training with an electromyography (EMG)-driven hand robot. , 2013, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[13]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[14]  Sang Hyuk Son,et al.  A Framework to Automate Assessment of Upper-Limb Motor Function Impairment: A Feasibility Study , 2015, Sensors.

[15]  Pornchai Phukpattaranont,et al.  Feature reduction and selection for EMG signal classification , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  J. van den Berg,et al.  EMG to force processing I: An electrical analogue of the Hill muscle model. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Ta-Te Lin,et al.  A comparison of upper-limb motion pattern recognition using EMG signals during dynamic and isometric muscle contractions , 2014, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[18]  W. Harwin,et al.  The effect of the GENTLE/s robot-mediated therapy system on arm function after stroke , 2008, Clinical rehabilitation.

[19]  W. Rymer,et al.  Editorial: Surface Electromyography: Barriers Limiting Widespread Use of sEMG in Clinical Assessment and Neurorehabilitation , 2021, Frontiers in Neurology.

[20]  Zhongliang Yang,et al.  Surface EMG-based Sketching Recognition Using Two Analysis Windows and Gene Expression Programming , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[21]  Xun Chen,et al.  A Regression-Based Framework for Quantitative Assessment of Muscle Spasticity Using Combined EMG and Inertial Data From Wearable Sensors , 2019, Front. Neurosci..

[22]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[23]  Y. Kim,et al.  Development and validation of a prediction model for home discharge in patients with moderate stroke: The Korean stroke cohort for functioning and rehabilitation study , 2020, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[24]  Haiqing Zheng,et al.  A Novel Quantitative Spasticity Evaluation Method Based on Surface Electromyogram Signals and Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System , 2020, Frontiers in Neuroscience.

[25]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation , 2011, The Lancet.

[26]  David A. Freedman,et al.  Statistical Models: Theory and Practice: References , 2005 .

[27]  Yann Le Cun,et al.  A Theoretical Framework for Back-Propagation , 1988 .

[28]  Robert Riener,et al.  Rehabilitation Robotics , 2013, Found. Trends Robotics.

[29]  Daxi Xiong,et al.  A remote quantitative Fugl-Meyer assessment framework for stroke patients based on wearable sensor networks , 2016, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[30]  Robert Hecht-Nielsen III.3 – Theory of the Backpropagation Neural Network* , 1992 .

[31]  R. Lyle A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research , 1981, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[32]  Kevin K Dobbin,et al.  Optimally splitting cases for training and testing high dimensional classifiers , 2011, BMC Medical Genomics.

[33]  B. Ashworth PRELIMINARY TRIAL OF CARISOPRODOL IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS. , 1964, The Practitioner.

[34]  W. Rymer,et al.  Surface EMG in Clinical Assessment and Neurorehabilitation: Barriers Limiting Its Use , 2020, Frontiers in Neurology.

[35]  Jun Du,et al.  An Experimental Study on Speech Enhancement Based on Deep Neural Networks , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[36]  Jie Liu,et al.  Examination of Hand Muscle Activation and Motor Unit Indices Derived from Surface EMG in Chronic Stroke , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  Yongping Zheng,et al.  Distal versus proximal - an investigation on different supportive strategies by robots for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a randomized controlled trial , 2019, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[38]  Jian-Guo Zhang,et al.  Electromyography Biomarkers for Quantifying the Intraoperative Efficacy of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Patients With Resting Tremor , 2020, Frontiers in Neurology.

[39]  Woon-fong Wallace Leung,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of motor functional recovery process in chronic stroke patients during robot-assisted wrist training. , 2009, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[40]  Farshid Amirabdollahian,et al.  Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[41]  M. Levin,et al.  What Do Motor “Recovery” and “Compensation” Mean in Patients Following Stroke? , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[42]  N. Güler,et al.  A Study on Multiple Linear Regression Analysis , 2013 .

[43]  D. Sevilla,et al.  3,4-Diaminopyridine as a treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 1995, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[44]  Rong Song,et al.  A Comparison Between Electromyography-Driven Robot and Passive Motion Device on Wrist Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[45]  A. Boxtel,et al.  Optimal signal bandwidth for the recording of surface EMG activity of facial, jaw, oral, and neck muscles. , 2001 .

[46]  J. J. Xue,et al.  The effects of electromechanical wrist robot assistive system with neuromuscular electrical stimulation for stroke rehabilitation. , 2012, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[47]  M. Cesarelli,et al.  Machine learning to predict mortality after rehabilitation among patients with severe stroke , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[48]  Jacques de Villiers,et al.  Backpropagation neural nets with one and two hidden layers , 1993, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[49]  H. Guterman,et al.  Knowledge extraction from artificial neural network models , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation.

[50]  J. Woo,et al.  In patient stroke rehabilitation efficiency: Influence of organization of service delivery and staff numbers , 2008, BMC health services research.

[51]  J V Tu,et al.  Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[52]  J. Habbema,et al.  Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[53]  Janice J. Eng,et al.  Strength Training Improves Upper-Limb Function in Individuals With Stroke: A Meta-Analysis , 2010, Stroke.

[54]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patients recovering from stroke , 2005, Current atherosclerosis reports.

[55]  S. Sahrmann,et al.  The relationship of voluntary movement of spasticity in the upper motor neuron syndrome , 1977, Transactions of the American Neurological Association.

[56]  Harrison Si,et al.  Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology: Author Index , 2013 .

[57]  Rui Sun,et al.  Complexity Analysis of EMG Signals for Patients After Stroke During Robot-Aided Rehabilitation Training Using Fuzzy Approximate Entropy , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[58]  Yee Mon Aung,et al.  Estimation of Upper Limb Joint Angle Using Surface EMG Signal , 2013 .

[59]  J. Fung,et al.  Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[60]  Jun Zhao,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Upper-Limb Motor Function for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Based on Motor Synergy Analysis and Multi-Modality Fusion , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[61]  Yanhuan Huang,et al.  A comparison of the rehabilitation effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation robotic hand training and pure robotic hand training after stroke: A randomized controlled trial , 2020, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[62]  Ryanne J. M. Lemmens,et al.  Effects of task-oriented robot training on arm function, activity, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[63]  Carlos Balaguer,et al.  Review of Automated Systems for Upper Limbs Functional Assessment in Neurorehabilitation , 2019, IEEE Access.

[64]  F. Schmidt Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[65]  Xun Chen,et al.  Feasibility Study of Advanced Neural Networks Applied to sEMG-Based Force Estimation , 2018, Sensors.

[66]  Yongping Zheng,et al.  Early Stroke Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb Assisted with an Electromyography-Driven Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation-Robotic Arm , 2017, Front. Neurol..

[67]  Dave Winkler,et al.  Bayesian Regularization of Neural Networks , 2009, Artificial Neural Networks.

[68]  Parvin Mousavi,et al.  Robot-based assessment of motor and proprioceptive function identifies biomarkers for prediction of functional independence measures , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[69]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[70]  Manfredo Atzori,et al.  PaWFE: Fast Signal Feature Extraction Using Parallel Time Windows , 2019, Front. Neurorobot..

[71]  W. Rymer,et al.  Effects of changing wrist positions on finger flexor hypertonia in stroke survivors , 2006, Muscle & nerve.

[72]  Nurhazimah Nazmi,et al.  A Review of Classification Techniques of EMG Signals during Isotonic and Isometric Contractions , 2016, Sensors.

[73]  Roy D. Yates,et al.  Probability and stochastic processes , 1998 .

[74]  A. Dromerick Clinical Features of Spasticity and Principles of Treatment , 2002 .

[75]  S. K. Wee,et al.  Effects of a robot-assisted training of grasp and pronation/supination in chronic stroke: a pilot study , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[76]  Robert Hecht-Nielsen,et al.  Theory of the backpropagation neural network , 1989, International 1989 Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[77]  S. Page,et al.  Psychometric properties and administration of the wrist/hand subscales of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in minimally impaired upper extremity hemiparesis in stroke. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[78]  S. Karsoliya,et al.  Approximating Number of Hidden layer neurons in Multiple Hidden Layer BPNN Architecture , 2012 .

[79]  K. Tong,et al.  The responsiveness and correlation between Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Motor Status Scale, and the Action Research Arm Test in chronic stroke with upper-extremity rehabilitation robotic training , 2011, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.