Multiple bottlenecks in information processing? An electrophysiological examination

When two stimuli are to be processed in rapid succession, reaction time (RT) to the second stimulus is delayed. The slowing of RT has been attributed to a single processing bottleneck at response selection (RS) or to a central bottleneck following the initiation of the first response. The hypothesis of a response initiation bottleneck is mainly based on reports of underadditive interactions between stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) and the number of stimulus—response alternatives (simple vs. two-choice response). The present study tested the hypothesis of a response initiation bottleneck by recording the lateralized readiness potential (LRP), a brain wave, emerging during or immediately following RS. The LRP findings were consistent with a central bottleneck but did not support the late bottleneck hypothesis. Instead, the LRP provided direct evidence that the underadditive interaction of number of alternatives and SOA is due to an increase of response anticipations in the simple response condition.

[1]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  The Changing Pattern of Perceptual Analytic Strategies and Response Selection with Practice in a Two-Choice Reaction time task , 1978, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  A. Osman,et al.  The locus of dual-task interference: psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  L. Karlin,et al.  Effects of Number of Alternatives on the Psychological Refractory Period , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  C. Frith,et al.  Routes to action in reaction time tasks , 1986, Psychological research.

[5]  T Schubert.  [Analysis of interference effects in simultaneous processing of 2 problems]. , 1996, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie.

[6]  Torsten Schubert,et al.  Processing differences between simple and choice reactions affect bottleneck localization in overlapping tasks , 1999 .

[7]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[8]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Attention and human performance , 1973 .

[9]  F. Donders,et al.  Over de snelheid van psychische Processen , 1868 .

[10]  R. D. de Jong,et al.  Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Decision and Response in Dual-Task Interference , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  A. Welford.  THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .

[13]  M. Coles.  Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[14]  S. Sternberg.  The discovery of processing stages , 1969 .

[15]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[16]  Andries F. Sanders,et al.  Elements of Human Performance: Reaction Processes and Attention in Human Skill , 1998 .

[17]  J Miller,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference , 1992 .

[19]  W. Sommer,et al.  Partial advance information and response preparation: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Die Lokalisierung des Gruppierungseffektes bei überlappenden Aufgaben [The localisation of the grouping effect in overlapping tasks] , 1997 .

[21]  A Kok,et al.  Effects of task variables on measures of the mean onset latency of LRP depend on the scoring method. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[22]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Locus of the effect of the number of alternative responses : Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential , 1998 .

[23]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  J. Miller,et al.  A distinction between the initiation and the continuation of response preparation. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[25]  David E. Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .

[26]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .