A Quasilinear Predator-Prey Model with Indirect Prey-Taxis

This paper deals with a quasilinear predator-prey model with indirect prey-taxis $$\begin{aligned} \left\{ \begin{aligned}{}&u_t=\nabla \cdot (D(u)\nabla u)-\nabla \cdot (S(u)\nabla w)+rug(v)-uh(u),&(x,t)\in \Omega \times (0,\infty ), \\&w_t=d_{w}\Delta w- \mu w+\alpha v,&(x,t)\in \Omega \times (0,\infty ),\\&v_t=d_{v}\Delta v+f(v)-ug(v),&(x,t)\in \Omega \times (0,\infty ), \end{aligned} \right. \end{aligned}$$ under homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions in a smooth bounded domain $$\Omega \subset \mathbb {R}^{n}$$ , $$n\ge 1$$ , where $$d_{w},d_{v},\alpha ,\mu ,r>0$$ and the functions $$g,h,f \in C^{2}([0,\infty ))$$ . The nonlinear diffusivity D and chemosensitivity S are supposed to satisfy $$\begin{aligned} D(s)\ge a(s+1)^{-\gamma } \;\;\;and \;\;\;0\le S(s)\le bs(s+1)^{\beta -1} \;\;\text {for all}\;\; s\ge 0, \end{aligned}$$ with $$a,b>0$$ and $$\gamma ,\beta \in \mathbb {R}$$ . Suppose that $$\gamma +\beta <1+\frac{1}{n}$$ and $$\gamma <\frac{2}{n}$$ , it is proved that the problem has a unique global classical solution, which is uniformly bounded in time. In addition, we derive the asymptotic behavior of globally bounded solution in this system according to the different predation conditions.

[1]  Mario Fuest Analysis of a chemotaxis model with indirect signal absorption , 2019, Journal of Differential Equations.

[2]  Dirk Horstmann,et al.  Boundedness vs. blow-up in a chemotaxis system , 2005 .

[3]  Jie Xing,et al.  Boundedness and large-time behavior for a two-dimensional quasilinear chemotaxis-growth system with indirect signal consumption , 2020 .

[4]  M. Winkler,et al.  Critical mass for infinite-time aggregation in a chemotaxis model with indirect signal production , 2016, 1608.07622.

[5]  H. Gajewski,et al.  Global Behaviour of a Reaction‐Diffusion System Modelling Chemotaxis , 1998 .

[6]  O. Ladyženskaja Linear and Quasilinear Equations of Parabolic Type , 1968 .

[7]  Michael Winkler,et al.  Equilibration in a fully parabolic two-species chemotaxis system with competitive kinetics , 2016 .

[8]  Manmohan Singh,et al.  Predator-prey model with prey-taxis and diffusion , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[9]  Michael Winkler,et al.  Aggregation vs. global diffusive behavior in the higher-dimensional Keller–Segel model , 2010 .

[10]  Michael Winkler,et al.  A critical exponent in a degenerate parabolic equation , 2002 .

[11]  H. Byrne,et al.  Mathematical Biology , 2002 .

[12]  D. Wrzosek,et al.  The role of indirect prey‐taxis and interference among predators in pattern formation , 2020, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences.

[13]  T. Hillen,et al.  Pattern formation in prey-taxis systems , 2009, Journal of biological dynamics.

[14]  Boundedness in a quasilinear chemotaxis model with consumption of chemoattractant and logistic source , 2018 .

[15]  Louis Nirenberg,et al.  An extended interpolation inequality , 1966 .

[16]  Junjie Wei,et al.  Global bifurcation analysis and pattern formation in homogeneous diffusive predator–prey systems , 2016 .

[17]  Mingxin Wang,et al.  The Dynamics of a Predator–Prey Model with Diffusion and Indirect Prey-Taxis , 2019, Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations.

[18]  M. Zuk,et al.  Exploitation of Sexual Signals by Predators and Parasitoids , 1998, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[19]  Kevin J. Painter,et al.  CONVERGENCE OF A CANCER INVASION MODEL TO A LOGISTIC CHEMOTAXIS MODEL , 2013 .

[20]  M. C. Ferrari,et al.  Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectusThe present review is one in the special series of reviews on animal–plant interactions. , 2010 .

[21]  Mingxin Wang,et al.  Qualitative analysis of a ratio-dependent predator–prey system with diffusion , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mathematics.

[22]  J. Powell,et al.  Pattern Formation in a Model for Mountain Pine Beetle Dispersal: Linking Model Predictions to Data , 2013, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[23]  R. Macarthur,et al.  Graphical Representation and Stability Conditions of Predator-Prey Interactions , 1963, The American Naturalist.

[24]  G. Odell,et al.  Swarms of Predators Exhibit "Preytaxis" if Individual Predators Use Area-Restricted Search , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[25]  R. Arditi,et al.  Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: Ratio-Dependence , 1989 .

[26]  Eduard Feireisl,et al.  On convergence to equilibria for the Keller–Segel chemotaxis model , 2007 .

[27]  Tomasz Cieślak Quasilinear nonuniformly parabolic system modelling chemotaxis , 2007 .

[28]  Sining Zheng,et al.  Global boundedness of solutions in a reaction-diffusion system of predator-prey model with prey-taxis , 2015, Appl. Math. Lett..

[29]  Hai-Yang Jin,et al.  Global stability of prey-taxis systems , 2017 .

[30]  Jie Zhao Large time behavior of solution to quasilinear chemotaxis system with logistic source , 2020, Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A.

[31]  Wendi Wang,et al.  Global bifurcation of solutions for a predator–prey model with prey‐taxis , 2015 .

[32]  T. Wyatt Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Communication by Smell and Taste , 2003 .

[33]  魏俊杰,et al.  Neimark-Sacker bifurcation analysis in a discrete neutral Nicholson's blowflies system with delay , 2016 .

[34]  Wei Wang,et al.  Global boundedness in a quasilinear fully parabolic chemotaxis system with indirect signal production , 2017 .

[35]  L. Segel,et al.  Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability. , 1970, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  Boying Wu,et al.  Global existence of solutions and uniform persistence of a diffusive predator-prey model with prey-taxis ✩ , 2016 .

[37]  Yang Kuang,et al.  Global qualitative analysis of a ratio-dependent predator–prey system , 1998 .

[38]  Youshan Tao,et al.  Global existence of classical solutions to a predator–prey model with nonlinear prey-taxis , 2010 .

[39]  J. Tello,et al.  Predator–prey model with diffusion and indirect prey-taxis , 2016 .

[40]  Youshan Tao,et al.  Boundedness in a chemotaxis system with indirect signal production and generalized logistic source , 2018, Appl. Math. Lett..

[41]  P. Niu,et al.  Large time behavior in a chemotaxis model with logistic growth and indirect signal production , 2019 .

[42]  I. Ahn,et al.  Global well-posedness and stability analysis of prey-predator model with indirect prey-taxis , 2020 .

[43]  Wei Wang,et al.  Asymptotic stability in a fully parabolic quasilinear chemotaxis model with general logistic source and signal production , 2020 .

[44]  Jie Xing,et al.  On a fully parabolic singular chemotaxis-(growth) system with indirect signal production or consumption , 2021, Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik.

[45]  E. Jakob,et al.  CHEMOSENSORY RESPONSE TO PREY IN PHIDIPPUS AUDAX (ARANEAE, SALTICIDAE) AND PARDOSA MILVINA (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE) , 2002 .

[46]  Youshan Tao,et al.  To the exclusion of blow-up in a three-dimensional chemotaxis-growth model with indirect attractant production , 2016 .

[47]  Chunlai Mu,et al.  Boundedness in the higher-dimensional quasilinear chemotaxis-growth system with indirect attractant production , 2018, Comput. Math. Appl..

[48]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Biological Control in Theory and Practice , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[49]  Tian Xiang,et al.  Global dynamics for a diffusive predator–prey model with prey-taxis and classical Lotka–Volterra kinetics , 2018 .