Variance amplification and the golden ratio in production and inventory control

A discrete linear control theory model of a generic model of a replenishment rule is presented. The replenishment rule, which we term a “Deziel Eilon—automatic pipeline, inventory and order-based production control system”, is guaranteed to be stable. From a z-transform model of the policy, an analytical expression for bullwhip is derived that is directly equivalent to the common statistical measure often used in simulation, statistical and empirical studies to quantify the bullwhip effect. This analytical expression clearly shows that we can reduce bullwhip by taking a fraction of the error between the target and actual inventory and pipeline (or work in progress (WIP) or “orders placed but not yet received”) positions. This is in contrast to the common situation where ordering policies account for all of the error every time an order is placed. Furthermore, increasing the average age of the forecast reduces bullwhip, as does reducing the production/distribution lead-time. We then derive an analytical expression for inventory variance using the same procedure to identify the closed form bullwhip expression. We assume that a suitable objective function is linearly related to the bullwhip and inventory variance amplification ratios and then optimise the PIC system for different weightings of order rate and inventory level variance. We highlight two forms of the objective function, one where “the golden ratio” can be used to determine the optimal gain in the inventory and WIP feedback loop and another that allows the complete range of possible solutions to be visualised. It is interesting that the golden ratio, which commonly describes the optimum behaviour in the natural world, also describes the optimal feedback gain in a production and inventory control system.

[1]  Stephen M. Disney,et al.  The impact of information enrichment on the Bullwhip effect in supply chains: A control engineering perspective , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  A discrete transfer function model to determine the dynamic stability of a vendor managed inventory supply chain , 2002 .

[3]  Danny Berry,et al.  Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain , 1999 .

[4]  J. Holmström Product range management: a case study of supply chain operations in the European grocery industry , 1997 .

[5]  D. Towill Time compression and supply chain management ‐ a guided tour , 1996 .

[6]  John F. Magee,et al.  Production planning and inventory control , 1958 .

[7]  I︠a︡. Z. T︠S︡ypkin Sampling systems theory and its application , 1965 .

[8]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[9]  John B. Houlihan International supply chain management , 1985 .

[10]  R. W. Grubbström,et al.  Economic consequences of a production and inventory control policy , 2004 .

[11]  Mohammed M. Naim,et al.  The System Simplification Approach in Understanding the Dynamic Behaviour of a Manufacturing Supply Chain , 1992 .

[12]  Mohamed Mohamed Naim,et al.  An integrated approach to re‐engineering material and logistics control , 1997 .

[13]  Stephen M. Disney,et al.  Measuring and avoiding the bullwhip effect: A control theoretic approach , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Richard D. Metters,et al.  Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains , 1997 .

[15]  S. Disney,et al.  On the bullwhip and inventory variance produced by an ordering policy , 2003 .

[16]  Marc Lambrecht,et al.  Creating win-win scenarios from the bullwhip problem - By design not accident , 2003 .

[17]  Paul H. Zipkin,et al.  Foundations of Inventory Management , 2000 .

[18]  K. W. Cattermole Theory and Application of the Z-Transform Method , 1965 .

[19]  D. P. Deziel,et al.  A linear production-inventory control rule , 1967 .

[20]  Mohamed Mohamed Naim,et al.  Dynamic analysis of a WIP compensated decision support system , 1994 .

[21]  H. Simon,et al.  On the Application of Servomechanism Theory in the Study of Production Control , 1952 .

[22]  Stephen Michael Disney,et al.  Explicit filters and supply chain design , 2003 .

[23]  Robert W. Grubbström,et al.  A closed‐form expression for the net present value of a time‐power cash‐flow function , 1991 .

[24]  Stephen Michael Disney,et al.  The order-up-to policy "sweet spot": using proportional controllers to eliminate the bullwhip problem , 2003 .

[25]  Marc Lambrecht,et al.  Production and inventory control: The variability trade-off , 2002 .

[26]  Marc Lambrecht,et al.  Extending the beer game to include real-life supply chain characteristics , 1999 .

[27]  Robert W. Grubbström,et al.  On The Application of the Laplace Transform to Certain Economic Problems , 1967 .

[28]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[29]  J. Forrester Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[30]  Rosemary Varley,et al.  PRODUCT RANGE MANAGEMENT , 2001 .

[31]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  On the Stability of Supply Chains , 2002, Oper. Res..

[32]  D. Towill FORRIDGE - Principles of good practice in material flow , 1997 .

[33]  L. LeeHau,et al.  Information Distortion in a Supply Chain , 1997 .

[34]  Marc Lambrecht,et al.  The dynamics of aggregate planning , 2003 .

[35]  Marc Lambrecht,et al.  A bullwhip effect explorer , 1999 .