Incidental statistical summary representation over time.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Hee Yeon Im,et al. The effects of sampling and internal noise on the representation of ensemble average size , 2012, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[2] G W Humphreys,et al. Driving attention with the top down: The relative contribution of target templates to the linear separability effect in the size dimension , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[3] H. Helson. Adaptation-level as frame of reference for prediction of psychophysical data. , 1947, The American journal of psychology.
[4] M. Teghtsoonian. THE JUDGMENT OF SIZE. , 1965, The American journal of psychology.
[5] A. Treisman,et al. Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.
[6] M. Chun,et al. Selective attention modulates implicit learning , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[7] Daniel R. Little,et al. Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization. , 2011, Psychological review.
[8] David Whitney,et al. An aftereffect of adaptation to mean size , 2012, Visual cognition.
[9] L. Hedges,et al. Category effects on stimulus estimation: Shifting and skewed frequency distributions , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[10] I. Utochkin,et al. Parallel averaging of size is possible but range-limited: a reply to Marchant, Simons, and De Fockert. , 2014, Acta psychologica.
[11] D. Ariely. Seeing Sets: Representation by Statistical Properties , 2001, Psychological science.
[12] R. Sekuler,et al. Obligatory and adaptive averaging in visual short-term memory , 2015 .
[13] Xiaolan Fu,et al. Unstable mean context causes sensitivity loss and biased estimation of variability. , 2015, Journal of vision.
[14] Chris Oriet,et al. Size averaging of irrelevant stimuli cannot be prevented , 2013, Vision Research.
[15] I. Utochkin,et al. Ensemble summary statistics as a basis for rapid visual categorization. , 2015, Journal of vision.
[16] A. Parducci,et al. An adaptation-level analysis of ordinal effects in judgment. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.
[17] Nicholas B. Turk-Browne,et al. When numbers and statistics collide: Competition between numerosity perception and statistical learning , 2013 .
[18] M. Chun,et al. Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.
[19] Jack L. Vevea,et al. Why do categories affect stimulus judgment? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[20] Alice R. Albrecht,et al. Perceptually Averaging in a Continuous Visual World , 2010, Psychological science.
[21] Chris Oriet,et al. Rapid averaging? Not so fast! , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[22] Daniel J Simons,et al. Ensemble representations: effects of set size and item heterogeneity on average size perception. , 2013, Acta psychologica.
[23] Y. Kareev,et al. On the misperception of variability. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[24] Jüri Allik,et al. An almost general theory of mean size perception , 2013, Vision Research.
[25] David Melcher,et al. Stable statistical representations facilitate visual search. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[26] Cathleen M Moore,et al. Summary statistics of size: fixed processing capacity for multiple ensembles but unlimited processing capacity for single ensembles. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[27] Jennifer E. Corbett,et al. The whole is indeed more than the sum of its parts: perceptual averaging in the absence of individual item representation. , 2011, Acta psychologica.
[28] N. Anderson,et al. Subjective averaging of length with serial presentation , 1969 .
[29] Mia Setic,et al. Modelling the statistical processing of visual information , 2007, Neurocomputing.
[30] R. A. Leibler,et al. On Information and Sufficiency , 1951 .