Only When They Seek: Exploring Supervisor and Resident Perspectives and Positions on Upward Feedback

Introduction: Verbal feedback from trainees to supervisors is rare in medical education, although valuable for improvement in teaching skills. Research has mostly examined narrative comments on resident evaluations of their supervisors. This study aimed to explore supervisors' and residents' beliefs and experiences with upward feedback, along with recommendations to initiate and facilitate effective conversations. Methods: Using 60-minute focus group discussions, a previous study explored opinions of internal medicine residents and clinical supervisors at the Brigham and Women's Hospital regarding the impact of institutional culture on feedback conversations. For this study, we conducted a thematic analysis of the transcribed, anonymous data to identify key concepts pertaining only to verbal upward feedback, through the theoretical lens of Positioning theory. Results: Twenty-two supervisors and 29 residents participated in three and five focus groups, respectively. Identified themes were mapped to three research questions regarding (1) existing beliefs (lack of impact, risks to giving supervisors feedback, need for preparation and reflection), (2) experiences (nonspecific language, avoidance of upward feedback, bypassing the supervisor), and (3) recommended approaches (setting clear expectations, seeking specific feedback, emphasizing interest in growth). Discussion: Study participants appeared to assume learner–teacher positions during feedback conversations, resulting in residents' concerns of adverse consequences, beliefs that supervisors will neither accept feedback nor change their behaviors, and avoidance of constructive upward feedback. Residents suggested that emphasis on mutual professional growth and regular feedback seeking by supervisors could encourage them to take on the role of feedback providers. Their recommendations could be a valuable starting point for faculty development initiatives on upward feedback.

[1]  Nhien Nguyen.  The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth , 2021, The Learning Organization.

[2]  A. Edmondson,et al.  Reflections: Voice and Silence in Workplace Conversations , 2021 .

[3]  L. Stassen,et al.  Learner involvement in the co-creation of teaching and learning: AMEE Guide No. 138 , 2020, Medical teacher.

[4]  P. Teunissen,et al.  Learning Conversations: An Analysis of Their Theoretical Roots and Their Manifestations of Feedback and Debriefing in Medical Education. , 2020, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[5]  L. Varpio,et al.  Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131 , 2020, Medical teacher.

[6]  C. Fluit,et al.  Upward feedback in nursing: A matter of giving, taking and asking. , 2020, Nurse education in practice.

[7]  L. Robins,et al.  Faculty Perceptions of Formative Feedback from Medical Students , 2020, Teaching and learning in medicine.

[8]  A. Reid,et al.  Residency Faculty Teaching Evaluation: What Do Faculty, Residents, and Program Directors Want? , 2019, Family medicine.

[9]  D. R. Officer.  An Everyone Culture: Becoming a Deliberately Developmental Organization , 2018 .

[10]  C. V. D. van der Vleuten,et al.  About Politeness, Face, and Feedback: Exploring Resident and Faculty Perceptions of How Institutional Feedback Culture Influences Feedback Practices , 2018, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[11]  M. Happ,et al.  Qualitative Secondary Analysis: A Case Exemplar. , 2017, Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners.

[12]  J. Rich.  Proposing a Model of Co-Regulated Learning for Graduate Medical Education. , 2017, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[13]  M. McLean,et al.  Applying positioning theory to examine interactions between simulated patients and medical students: a narrative analysis , 2017, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[14]  L. Varpio,et al.  Feedback to Supervisors: Is Anonymity Really So Important? , 2016, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[15]  M. Husain,et al.  Students' feedback: An effective tool in teachers' evaluation system , 2016, International journal of applied & basic medical research.

[16]  R. M. van der Leeuw,et al.  Residents’ narrative feedback on teaching performance of clinical teachers: analysis of the content and phrasing of suggestions for improvement , 2016, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[17]  Monica C. Higgins,et al.  Understanding Psychological Safety in Health Care and Education Organizations: A Comparative Perspective , 2016 .

[18]  O. Arah,et al.  Clinical teaching performance improvement of faculty in residency training: A prospective cohort study , 2015, Medical teacher.

[19]  C. Vincent,et al.  The outcomes of recent patient safety education interventions for trainee physicians and medical students: a systematic review , 2015, BMJ Open.

[20]  Eva Lidén,et al.  Patient participation in discharge planning conference , 2014, International journal of integrated care.

[21]  N. McNaughton,et al.  Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91 , 2014, Medical teacher.

[22]  A. Edmondson,et al.  Psychological Safety: The History, Renaissance, and Future of an Interpersonal Construct , 2014 .

[23]  K. Lombarts,et al.  Explaining how faculty members act upon residents' feedback to improve their teaching performance , 2013, Medical education.

[24]  Timothy J. Wood,et al.  Quality In-Training Evaluation Reports—Does Feedback Drive Faculty Performance? , 2013, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[25]  M. Asumeng.  The Effect of Employee Feedback-Seeking on Job Performance: An Empirical Study , 2013 .

[26]  L. Lingard,et al.  Engaged at the Extremes: Residents’ Perspectives on Clinical Teaching Assessment , 2012, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[27]  R. Harré.  Positioning Theory: Moral Dimensions of Social-Cultural Psychology , 2012 .

[28]  L. Lingard,et al.  A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Residents' Written Comments Regarding Their Clinical Supervisors , 2011, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[29]  B. Kilburn,et al.  Leader behavior: gatekeeper to voluntary upward feedback , 2010 .

[30]  F. Gino,et al.  Is yours a learning organization? , 2008, Harvard business review.

[31]  C. Dweck.  Mindset: The New Psychology of Success , 2006 .

[32]  Jon Veloski,et al.  Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians’ clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7 , 2006, Medical teacher.

[33]  A. Gellhorn.  Graduate medical education in internal medicine. , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[34]  J. Lockyer,et al.  An Examination of Self-Reported Assessment Activities Documented by Specialist Physicians for Maintenance of Certification. , 2020, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[35]  J. Lockyer,et al.  Assessment and Change: An Exploration of Documented Assessment Activities and Outcomes by Canadian Psychiatrists , 2018, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[36]  G. Kaupins.  An Everyone Culture: Becoming a Deliberately Developmental Organization , 2016 .

[37]  P. Baker,et al.  Confounding factors in using upward feedback to assess the quality of medical training: a systematic review. , 2014, Journal of educational evaluation for health professions.

[38]  J. Heaton.  Reworking Qualitative Data , 2004 .

[39]  P. Maurette,et al.  [To err is human: building a safer health system]. , 2002, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation.

[40]  Luk Van Langenhove,et al.  Positioning theory : moral contexts of intentional action , 1999 .