EEG-based classification of video quality perception using steady state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs)

OBJECTIVE Recent studies exploit the neural signal recorded via electroencephalography (EEG) to get a more objective measurement of perceived video quality. Most of these studies capitalize on the event-related potential component P3. We follow an alternative approach to the measurement problem investigating steady state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) as EEG correlates of quality changes. Unlike the P3, SSVEPs are directly linked to the sensory processing of the stimuli and do not require long experimental sessions to get a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio. Furthermore, we investigate the correlation of the EEG-based measures with the outcome of the standard behavioral assessment. APPROACH As stimulus material, we used six gray-level natural images in six levels of degradation that were created by coding the images with the HM10.0 test model of the high efficiency video coding (H.265/MPEG-HEVC) using six different compression rates. The degraded images were presented in rapid alternation with the original images. In this setting, the presence of SSVEPs is a neural marker that objectively indicates the neural processing of the quality changes that are induced by the video coding. We tested two different machine learning methods to classify such potentials based on the modulation of the brain rhythm and on time-locked components, respectively. MAIN RESULTS Results show high accuracies in classification of the neural signal over the threshold of the perception of the quality changes. Accuracies significantly correlate with the mean opinion scores given by the participants in the standardized degradation category rating quality assessment of the same group of images. SIGNIFICANCE The results show that neural assessment of video quality based on SSVEPs is a viable complement of the behavioral one and a significantly fast alternative to methods based on the P3 component.

[1]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[2]  E. Halgren,et al.  The intracranial topography of the P3 event-related potential elicited during auditory oddball. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  Julien Perez,et al.  On the measurement of image quality perception using frontal EEG analysis , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Smart Communications in Network Technologies (SaCoNeT).

[4]  Smith-Kettlewell Neural correlates of object-based attention , 2002 .

[5]  Gary J. Sullivan,et al.  Overview of the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[6]  C. Herrmann Human EEG responses to 1–100 Hz flicker: resonance phenomena in visual cortex and their potential correlation to cognitive phenomena , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  R. VanRullen,et al.  Spontaneous EEG oscillations reveal periodic sampling of visual attention , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  K. Müller,et al.  Single-trial analysis of the neural correlates of speech quality perception , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  J. Masdeu,et al.  Human Cerebral Activation during Steady-State Visual-Evoked Responses , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  K. Müller,et al.  Psychological predictors of SMR-BCI performance , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[11]  J T Kelly,et al.  Assessing quality. , 1988, JAMA.

[12]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG-based communication: improved accuracy by response verification. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Predicting BCI Subject Performance Using Probabilistic Spatio-Temporal Filters , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  R. VanRullen,et al.  The Phase of Ongoing EEG Oscillations Predicts Visual Perception , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance , 2010, NeuroImage.

[16]  D. Regan Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[17]  Sebastian Möller,et al.  Using Electroencephalography to Measure Perceived Video Quality , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[18]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Revealing the neural response to imperceptible peripheral flicker with machine learning , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[19]  M. Kubát An Introduction to Machine Learning , 2017, Springer International Publishing.

[20]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging , 2014, NeuroImage.

[21]  Michael S. Lazar,et al.  Spatial patterns underlying population differences in the background EEG , 2005, Brain Topography.

[22]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Effects of spatial selective attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential in the 20-28 Hz range. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  David Little,et al.  The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Perspectives on the Making of Supranational Language Education Policy , 2007 .

[24]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Generalizing Analytic Shrinkage for Arbitrary Covariance Structures , 2013, NIPS.

[25]  T. Ergenoğlu,et al.  Alpha rhythm of the EEG modulates visual detection performance in humans. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  T W Picton,et al.  The P300 Wave of the Human Event‐Related Potential , 1992, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[27]  M Congedo,et al.  A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[28]  Sebastian Bosse,et al.  Neurally informed assessment of perceived natural texture image quality , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[29]  Ivan Volosyak,et al.  Multiple Channel Detection of Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  M. Brandt,et al.  The effect of the phase of prestimulus alpha activity on the averaged visual evoked response. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[31]  Sebastian Bosse,et al.  Toward a Direct Measure of Video Quality Perception Using EEG , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[32]  Hidehiko Hayashi,et al.  Assessment of extra high quality images using both EEG and assessment words on high order sensations , 2000, Smc 2000 conference proceedings. 2000 ieee international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. 'cybernetics evolving to systems, humans, organizations, and their complex interactions' (cat. no.0.

[33]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Spatio-spectral filters for improving the classification of single trial EEG , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  A BCI-based environmental controller for the motion-disabled , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[35]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Resting electroencephalogram alpha-power over posterior sites indexes baseline visual cortex excitability , 2008, Neuroreport.

[36]  G. L. Calhoun,et al.  EEG-based control for human-computer interaction , 1996, Proceedings Third Annual Symposium on Human Interaction with Complex Systems. HICS'96.

[37]  Motoaki Kawanabe,et al.  Stationary common spatial patterns for brain–computer interfacing , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[38]  A Graser,et al.  BCI Demographics II: How Many (and What Kinds of) People Can Use a High-Frequency SSVEP BCI? , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[39]  E. Donchin,et al.  On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[40]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Towards an independent brain–computer interface using steady state visual evoked potentials , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[41]  Robert J. Safranek,et al.  Signal compression based on models of human perception , 1993, Proc. IEEE.

[42]  R. Johnson,et al.  On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[43]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Combined Optimization of Spatial and Temporal Filters for Improving Brain-Computer Interfacing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  D M Durand,et al.  Suppression of axonal conduction by sinusoidal stimulation in rat hippocampus in vitro , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[45]  Benjamin Blankertz,et al.  Common spatial pattern patches - An optimized filter ensemble for adaptive brain-computer interfaces , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[46]  Elvezio Ronchetti,et al.  Robustness of Design , 2005 .

[47]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Visual spatial attention tracking using high-density SSVEP data for independent brain-computer communication , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[48]  Sebastian Möller,et al.  Analyzing Speech Quality Perception Using Electroencephalography , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[49]  Marcus A. Magnor,et al.  Evaluation of video artifact perception using event-related potentials , 2011, APGV '11.

[50]  S A Hillyard,et al.  Feature-selective attention enhances color signals in early visual areas of the human brain , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Simon Hanslmayr,et al.  Prestimulus oscillations predict visual perception performance between and within subjects , 2007, NeuroImage.

[52]  S. A. Hillyard,et al.  Sustained division of the attentional spotlight , 2003, Nature.

[53]  A. Cichocki,et al.  Steady-state visually evoked potentials: Focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives , 2010, Progress in Neurobiology.

[54]  Ladan Shams,et al.  Early modulation of visual cortex by sound: an MEG study , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[55]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Introduction to machine learning for brain imaging , 2011, NeuroImage.

[56]  Thomas Wiegand,et al.  Measuring perceptual differences between compressed and uncompressed video sequences using the swept-parameter Visual Evoked Potential , 2014 .

[57]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Single-trial analysis and classification of ERP components — A tutorial , 2011, NeuroImage.

[58]  Marcus A. Magnor,et al.  Single-trial EEG classification of artifacts in videos , 2012, TAP.

[59]  B. Allison,et al.  BCI Demographics: How Many (and What Kinds of) People Can Use an SSVEP BCI? , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[60]  Giuseppe Andreoni,et al.  A Robust and Self-Paced BCI System Based on a Four Class SSVEP Paradigm: Algorithms and Protocols for a High-Transfer-Rate Direct Brain Communication , 2009, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[61]  Reinhold Scherer,et al.  Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based communication: impact of harmonic frequency components , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[62]  W. Klimesch,et al.  Visual discrimination performance is related to decreased alpha amplitude but increased phase locking , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[63]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Decoding Brain States during Auditory Perception by Supervising Unsupervised Learning , 2013, J. Comput. Sci. Eng..

[64]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  EEG correlates during video quality perception , 2014, 2014 22nd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[65]  S. Rose Selective attention , 1992, Nature.

[66]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  A P300 event-related potential brain–computer interface (BCI): The effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[67]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[68]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Motion Tuned Spatio-Temporal Quality Assessment of Natural Videos , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[69]  E. Donchin Event-related Brain Potentials: A Tool in the Study of Human Information Processing , 1979 .

[70]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  CSP patches: an ensemble of optimized spatial filters. An evaluation study , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[71]  Cristina Hava Muntean,et al.  User-centered EEG-based multimedia quality assessment , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB).

[72]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Early modulation of visual perception by emotional arousal: Evidence from steady-state visual evoked brain potentials , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[73]  W. Singer,et al.  The response of cat visual cortex to flicker stimuli of variable frequency , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[74]  P. Rossini,et al.  Pre- and poststimulus alpha rhythms are related to conscious visual perception: a high-resolution EEG study. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[75]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[76]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  Design and implementation of a brain-computer interface with high transfer rates , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[77]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[78]  William J Tyler,et al.  A quantitative overview of biophysical forces impinging on neural function , 2013, Physical biology.

[79]  G. Sperling,et al.  Attentional modulation of SSVEP power depends on the network tagged by the flicker frequency. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[80]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[81]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern (FBCSP) in Brain-Computer Interface , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence).

[82]  M. Brandt,et al.  The relationship between prestimulus-alpha amplitude and visual evoked potential amplitude. , 1991, The International journal of neuroscience.

[83]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Can the Spotlight of Attention Be Shaped Like a Doughnut? Evidence From Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials , 2002 .

[84]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  Using ERPs for assessing the (sub) conscious perception of noise , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[85]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Outex - new framework for empirical evaluation of texture analysis algorithms , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[86]  Marcus A. Magnor,et al.  Assessing the quality of compressed images using EEG , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[87]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  A regularized discriminative framework for EEG analysis with application to brain–computer interface , 2010, NeuroImage.

[88]  N. Busch,et al.  Gamma amplitudes are coupled to theta phase in human EEG during visual perception. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[89]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. , 2000, Psychophysiology.