Using wavelet transform for cardiotocography signals classification

As a fetal surveillance technique, cardiotocography (CTG) involves fetal heart rate (FHR), uterine contraction activities, and fetal movements. CTG is practiced as a primary diagnostic test throughout the world to identify events that may pose a risk to the fetus during pregnancy and delivery. In this work, FHR signals carrying vital information on fetus were analyzed by using Haar (haar), Daubechies (db5), and Symlets (sym5) mother wavelet families between levels 1 and 12. The traditionally used morphological and linear features are obtained from FHR. Also, p-norm, Frobenius form, infinity, and negative infinity norms which are obtained separately from the each of the wavelet components were used as a feature to support the classification. The obtained features were applied as an input to k-nearest neighbors (kNN) and artificial neural network (ANN) classifiers in order to discriminate the normal and hypoxic fetuses. According to experimental results, 90.51% and 90.21% classification success on the discrimination of normal and hypoxic fetuses were achieved by using haar at level 4 and kNN.

[1]  D. Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography , 2015, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[2]  Rijul S. Soans,et al.  Automatic classification of toco-signals: An approach towards comprehensive monitoring of labour progress , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Signal Processing and Communications (SPCOM).

[3]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Using nonlinear features for fetal heart rate classification , 2012, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[4]  Carlo Cattani,et al.  On the Creation of a New Diagnostic Model for Fetal Well-Being on the Base of Wavelet Analysis of Cardiotocograms , 2006, Journal of Medical Systems.

[5]  Zafer Cömert,et al.  Cardiotocography signals with artificial neural network and extreme learning machine , 2016, 2016 24th Signal Processing and Communication Application Conference (SIU).

[6]  Sarah Rhöse,et al.  Inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement of non‐reassuring cardiotocography analysis and subsequent clinical management , 2014, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[7]  Maria Romano,et al.  Analysis of Foetal Heart Rate Variability Components by Means of Empirical Mode Decomposition , 2016 .

[8]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Linear and nonlinear analysis of heart rate patterns associated with fetal behavioral states in the antepartum period. , 2007, Early human development.

[9]  R. Gonzalez-Camarena,et al.  Analysis of high frequency fetal heart rate variability using empirical mode decomposition , 2005, Computers in Cardiology, 2005.

[10]  A. Cahill,et al.  Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present, and future. , 2011, Clinics in perinatology.

[11]  I A Basheer,et al.  Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. , 2000, Journal of microbiological methods.

[12]  George A. Macones,et al.  Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles , 2009 .

[13]  Abdulhamit Subasi,et al.  Classification of the cardiotocogram data for anticipation of fetal risks using machine learning techniques , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[14]  J. P. Marques de Sá,et al.  The Porto system for automated cardiotocographic signal analysis , 1991, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[15]  Zafer Cömert,et al.  Evaluation of Fetal Distress Diagnosis during Delivery Stages based on Linear and Nonlinear Features of Fetal Heart Rate for Neural Network Community , 2016 .

[16]  E. Chandraharan,et al.  Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management. , 2016, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[17]  Sergio Cerutti,et al.  Linear and nonlinear parameters for the analysisof fetal heart rate signal from cardiotocographic recordings , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  D. Koutsouris,et al.  Computerised intrapartum diagnosis of fetal hypoxia based on fetal heart rate monitoring and fetal pulse oximetry recordings utilising wavelet analysis and neural networks , 2002, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[19]  Edmond Zahedi,et al.  Antepartum fetal heart rate feature extraction and classification using empirical mode decomposition and support vector machine , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[20]  Chrysostomos D. Stylios,et al.  Feature Extraction and Classification of Fetal Heart Rate Using Wavelet Analysis and Support Vector Machines , 2006, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[21]  G. Macones,et al.  Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: Nomenclature, Interpretation, and General Management Principles , 2009 .

[22]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Open access intrapartum CTG database , 2014, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.