Prestige Among Graduate and Professional Schools: Comparing the U.S. News’ Graduate School Reputation Ratings Between Disciplines

Using a conceptual model, this study examines the variables associated with the U.S. News and World Report peer assessment ratings of graduate and professional schools in business, education, engineering, law, and medicine. What are the correlates of prestige among the nation’s leading graduate and professional schools, and are they consistent with prior studies of prestige? Not since the studies of the 1995 National Research Council (NRC) data have scholars examined the correlates of prestige for individual graduate programs, and no study has ever extensively examined the U.S. News graduate ratings. Using available data from U.S. News, as well as institutional websites and ISI Web of Science information, this analysis finds robust relationships between the U.S. News graduate school reputation ratings and the model-relevant indicators, especially enrollment size, admissions test scores, and faculty publications per capita.

[1]  C. Schmitz.  Assessing the Validity of Higher Education Indicators , 1993 .

[2]  David S. Webster.  The Evidence for Quality: Strengthening the Tests of Academic and Administrative Effectiveness, , 1994 .

[3]  N. Babchuk,et al.  The Quest for Institutional Recognition: A Longitudinal Analysis of Scholarly Productivity and Academic Prestige among Sociology Departments , 1998 .

[4]  K. Bollen,et al.  Perceived quality and methodology in graduate department ratings: Sociology, political science, and economics , 2003 .

[5]  Michael D. McGuire,et al.  Validity issues for reputational studies , 1995 .

[6]  J. F. Volkwein,et al.  Establishing Academic Program Priorities , 1978 .

[7]  Robert K. Toutkoushian,et al.  Using Publications Counts to Measure an Institution's Research Productivity , 2003 .

[8]  Debra L. Stuart.  Reputational rankings: Background and development , 1995 .

[9]  J. F. Volkwein.  Changes in Quality among Public Universities. , 1989 .

[10]  Joseph C. Burke.  Achieving Accountability in Higher Education: Balancing Public, Academic, and Market Demands , 2003 .

[11]  Gordon C. Winston.  Why Can't a College Be More Like a Firm?. , 1997 .

[12]  W. Hagstrom.  Inputs, Outputs, and the Prestige of University Science Departments , 1971 .

[13]  Charles J. Andersen,et al.  A rating of graduate programs , 1970 .

[14]  Henrik P Minassians,et al.  Reporting higher education results : missing links in the performance chain , 2003 .

[15]  P. Ewell.  A Matter of Integrity Accountability and the Future of Self-Regulation , 1994 .

[16]  A. Astin,et al.  A New Study of Excellence in Undergraduate Education , 1981 .

[17]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Volume 2. , 2005 .

[18]  Henry Y. Zheng,et al.  Assessing the Performance of Public Research Universities Using NSF/NCES Data and Data Envelopment Analysis Technique Professional File , 2002 .

[19]  N. Diamond,et al.  The Rise of American Research Universities: Elites and Challengers in the Postwar Era , 1997 .

[20]  David L. Tan.  A multivariate approach to the assessment of quality , 1992 .

[21]  V. Zeithaml,et al.  A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality: From Expectations to Behavioral Intentions , 1993 .

[22]  A. Astin,et al.  Achieving educational excellence , 1985 .

[23]  J. Fredericks Volkwein,et al.  The Cost Structure of American Research Universities , 1991 .

[24]  N. Diamond,et al.  How Should We Rate Research Universities? , 2000 .

[25]  Catherine M. Millett,et al.  A Culture of Evidence: Postsecondary Assessment and Learning Outcomes. Recommendations to Policymakers and the Higher Education Community. , 2006 .

[26]  J. F. Volkwein.  Campus Autonomy and Its Relationship to Measures of University Quality. , 1986 .

[27]  Alexander W. Astin,et al.  Are Reputational Ratings Needed to Measure Quality , 1981 .

[28]  Stephen D. Grunig,et al.  Research, Reputation, and Resources: The Effect of Research Activity on Perceptions of Undergraduate Education and Institutional Resource Acquisition. , 1997 .

[29]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How college affects students : findings and insights from twenty years of research , 1992 .

[30]  B. Maher,et al.  Research-doctorate programs in the United States: continuity and change , 1996 .

[31]  David Scott Webster,et al.  Academic Quality Rankings of American Colleges and Universities , 1986 .

[32]  Walter F. Abbott,et al.  Stratification Theory and Organizational Rank , 1972 .

[33]  The 1995 Nrc Ratings of Doctoral Programs: A Hedonic Model , 1996 .

[34]  Stéphane Baldi,et al.  Changes in the stratification structure of sociology, 1964–1992 , 1994 .

[35]  L. Sax,et al.  The American Freshman: National Norms for Fall 2000. , 2000 .

[36]  C. F. Elton,et al.  Physics Department Ratings: Another Evaluation , 1971, Science.

[37]  J. C. Smart,et al.  Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research , 2001, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research.

[38]  D. Seymour.  On Q: Causing Quality In Higher Education , 1992 .

[39]  Stephen R. Porter,et al.  Institutional research productivity and the connection to average student quality and overall reputation , 2006 .

[40]  J. F. Volkwein,et al.  Institutional Prestige and Reputation among Research Universities and Liberal Arts Colleges* , 2006 .

[41]  Allan M. Cartter,et al.  An Assessment of Quality in Graduate Education , 1966 .

[42]  A. Anastasi.  Psychological testing, 6th ed. , 1988 .

[43]  David R. Krathwohl,et al.  Methods of Educational and Social Science Research: An Integrated Approach , 1992 .

[44]  I. Feller,et al.  The Dispersion of Academic Research in the 1980s , 1995 .

[45]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Reliability and Validity Assessment , 1979 .

[46]  Ronald G. Ehrenberg.  Reaching for the Brass Ring: The U.S. News & World Report Rankings and Competition , 2002 .