The Contributions of Strategy Use to Working Memory Span: A Comparison of Strategy Assessment Methods

In two experiments, we tested whether individual differences in strategy production account for individual differences in performance on a working memory span task. We measured the strategies used during a standard experimenter-paced operation span (OSPAN) task by having participants make both set-by-set reports of strategy use for individual item sets and global reports of strategy use. In Experiment 1, although normatively effective strategies were self-reported on only a small proportion of OSPAN sets, individual differences in effective strategy use correlated with span performance. Experiment 2 replicated this outcome using a sample of 100 participants but, as important, it demonstrated that individual differences in effective strategy use did not mediate the relationship between OSPAN and measures of verbal ability. Discussion focuses on the interpretation of strategy–span relationships and the relative utility of general reports of strategy use versus the set-by-set reports introduced here for the OSPAN task.

[1]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[2]  Ruth B. Ekstrom,et al.  Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests , 1976 .

[3]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  R. Engle,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Willa B. Gupta,et al.  Air Force Officer Qualifying Test (AFOQT) Form P: Test Manual , 1990 .

[6]  G. Waters,et al.  The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: critique of Just and Carpenter (1992) , 1996, Psychological review.

[7]  What is a Theory of Thought , 1999 .

[8]  George W. Ledger,et al.  Acquisition and Transfer of an Integrative Imagery Strategy by Young Children. , 1987 .

[9]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Bradley R. Postle,et al.  Short Term and Working Memory , 2009 .

[11]  K. Oberauer Binding and inhibition in working memory: individual and age differences in short-term recognition. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  S. Tipper,et al.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[13]  M. Daneman,et al.  Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[15]  T. Salthouse The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[16]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  A. Miyake,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control , 1999 .

[18]  R. Engle,et al.  Executive Attention, Working Memory Capacity, and a Two-Factor Theory of Cognitive Control. , 2003 .

[19]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Measuring strategy production during associative learning: The relative utility of concurrent versus retrospective reports , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[20]  H. Lee Swanson,et al.  Generality and modifiability of working memory among skilled and less skilled readers , 1992 .

[21]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Short-Term-Memory, Verbal Competence, and Age as Predictors of Imagery Instructional-Effectiveness , 1987 .

[22]  D. McNamara,et al.  Working memory capacity and strategy use , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  The role of interference in memory span , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[24]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The nature of cognition , 2000 .

[25]  K. Turley-Ames,et al.  Strategy training and working memory task performance. , 2003 .

[26]  F. Craik,et al.  The Oxford handbook of memory , 2006 .

[27]  Christy L. McGuire,et al.  Aging, Attributions, Perceived Control, and Strategy Use in a Free Recall Task , 1998 .

[28]  M. Pressley,et al.  Task parameters affecting the efficacy of a visual imagery learning strategy in younger and older children , 1977 .

[29]  R. Engle,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. , 1999 .

[30]  R. Engle,et al.  The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  M. Pressley,et al.  Pictures, Partial Pictures, and Young Children's Oral Prose Learning. , 1977 .

[32]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Working Memory Capacity , 2005 .

[33]  L Hasher,et al.  Working memory span and the role of proactive interference. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  Akira Miyake,et al.  The reading span test and its predictive power for reading comprehension ability , 2004 .

[35]  Joyce L. Harris,et al.  The association of elaborative or maintenance rehearsal with age, reading comprehension, and verbal working memory performance , 2000 .

[36]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .