Subject-specific hip geometry and hip joint centre location affects calculated contact forces at the hip during gait.

Hip loading affects the development of hip osteoarthritis, bone remodelling and osseointegration of implants. In this study, we analyzed the effect of subject-specific modelling of hip geometry and hip joint centre (HJC) location on the quantification of hip joint moments, muscle moments and hip contact forces during gait, using musculoskeletal modelling, inverse dynamic analysis and static optimization. For 10 subjects, hip joint moments, muscle moments and hip loading in terms of magnitude and orientation were quantified using three different model types, each including a different amount of subject-specific detail: (1) a generic scaled musculoskeletal model, (2) a generic scaled musculoskeletal model with subject-specific hip geometry (femoral anteversion, neck-length and neck-shaft angle) and (3) a generic scaled musculoskeletal model with subject-specific hip geometry including HJC location. Subject-specific geometry and HJC location were derived from CT. Significant differences were found between the three model types in HJC location, hip flexion-extension moment and inclination angle of the total contact force in the frontal plane. No model agreement was found between the three model types for the calculation of contact forces in terms of magnitude and orientations, and muscle moments. Therefore, we suggest that personalized models with individualized hip joint geometry and HJC location should be used for the quantification of hip loading. For biomechanical analyses aiming to understand modified hip joint loading, and planning hip surgery in patients with osteoarthritis, the amount of subject-specific detail, related to bone geometry and joint centre location in the musculoskeletal models used, needs to be considered.

[1]  R. Brand,et al.  Prediction of hip joint centre location from external landmarks , 1989 .

[2]  S. Delp,et al.  Effects of hip center location on the moment-generating capacity of the muscles. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  P. Noble,et al.  A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  R. Huiskes The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  Ahmet Erdemir,et al.  Assessment of the functional method of hip joint center location subject to reduced range of hip motion. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  J J O'Connor,et al.  Bone position estimation from skin marker co-ordinates using global optimisation with joint constraints. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Stress analysis of the proximo-medial femur after total hip replacement. , 1990, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[8]  G Van der Perre,et al.  Subject-specific hip geometry affects predicted hip joint contact forces during gait. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  Accuracy of the functional method of hip joint center location: effects of limited motion and varied implementation. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  M P Kadaba,et al.  Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  M Viceconti,et al.  CT-based surgical planning software improves the accuracy of total hip replacement preoperative planning. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  T. Theologis,et al.  Prediction of the hip joint centre in adults, children, and patients with cerebral palsy based on magnetic resonance imaging. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  L Solomon,et al.  Patterns of osteoarthritis of the hip. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  D R Pedersen,et al.  A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  G Bergmann,et al.  Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  I. Jonkers,et al.  Relation between subject-specific hip joint loading, stress distribution in the proximal femur and bone mineral density changes after total hip replacement. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  F. Zajac Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[18]  G Van der Perre,et al.  Aberrant pelvis and hip kinematics impair hip loading before and after total hip replacement. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[19]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[20]  Joel A. Block,et al.  Bone Density, Dynamic Joint Loading and Joint Degeneration , 2001, Cells Tissues Organs.

[21]  F.E. Zajac,et al.  An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[23]  S. Delp,et al.  Superior displacement of the hip in total joint replacement: Effects of prosthetic neck length, neck‐stem angle, and anteversion angle on the moment‐generating capacity of the muscles , 1994, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[24]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  P. Costigan,et al.  Radiographic and non-invasive determination of the hip joint center location: effect on hip joint moments. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[26]  S Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  Validation of a functional method for the estimation of hip joint centre location. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Influence of femoral anteversion on proximal femoral loading: measurement and simulation in four patients. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[28]  A Cappello,et al.  Effects of hip joint centre mislocation on gait analysis results. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Personalized MR-based musculoskeletal models compared to rescaled generic models in the presence of increased femoral anteversion: effect on hip moment arm lengths. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[30]  S. Delp,et al.  How Superior Placement of the Joint Center in Hip Arthroplasty Affects the Abductor Muscles , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  R. B. Davis,et al.  A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique , 1991 .