Going offline: An exploratory cultural artifact analysis of an internet dating site's development trajectories

In this study we develop a theorization of an Internet dating site as a cultural artifact. The site, Gaydar, is targeted at gay men. We argue that contemporary received representations of their sexuality figure heavily in the site’s focus by providing a cultural logic for the apparent ad hoc development trajectories of its varied commercial and non-­‐commercial services. More specifically, we suggest that the growing sets of services related to the website are heavily enmeshed within current social practices and meanings. These practices and meanings are, in turn, shaped by the interactions and preferences of a variety of diverse groups involved in what is routinely seen within the mainstream literature as a singularly specific sexuality and cultural project. Thus, we attend to two areas – the influence of the various social engagements associated with Gaydar together with the further extension of its trajectory ‘beyond the web’. Through the case of Gaydar, we contribute a study that recognizes the need for attention to sexuality in information systems research and one which illustrates sexuality as a pivotal aspect of culture. We also draw from anthropology to theorize ICTs as cultural artifacts and provide insights into the contemporary phenomena of ICT enabled social networking.

[1]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Globalization and IT: Agenda for Research , 2000, Organizational and Social Perspectives on IT.

[2]  Jonathan Gershuny,et al.  Post-Industrial Society: The myth of the service economy , 1977 .

[3]  Simon Rogerson,et al.  Ethics and Information Technology , 1997, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  W. Gibb Dyer,et al.  Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, To Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt , 1991 .

[5]  Jeff Hearn,et al.  'Sex' at 'Work': The Power and Paradox of Organization Sexuality , 1987 .

[6]  Andrew Gorman-Murray,et al.  The globalization of sexuality , 2006 .

[7]  F. Jameson,et al.  Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism , 1992 .

[8]  Ian Hodder,et al.  The meanings of things : material culture and symbolic expression , 1990 .

[9]  Cheryl L. Nicholas Gaydar: Eye-gaze as identity recognition among gay men and lesbians , 2004 .

[10]  Anna Livia,et al.  Public and Clandestine: Gay Men's Pseudonyms on the French Minitel , 2002 .

[11]  A. Wharton,et al.  The Sociology of Gender: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 2004 .

[12]  Anne Cranny-Francis,et al.  Gender Studies: Terms and Debates , 2002 .

[13]  G. Dowsett,et al.  Some Considerations on Sexuality and Gender in the Context of AIDS , 2003, Reproductive health matters.

[14]  F. Voget A history of ethnology , 1977, Medical History.

[15]  Alison Adam,et al.  A Decade of Neglect: Reflecting on Gender and IS , 2004 .

[16]  Erkki Karvonen,et al.  The Information Society Reader , 2004 .

[17]  Lynette Kvasny,et al.  Giving Voice to Feminist Projects in MIS Research , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact..

[18]  David Knights,et al.  Organization Theory in the Age of Deconstruction: Dualism, Gender and Postmodernism Revisited , 1997 .

[19]  Barry Smart,et al.  Modern Conditions, Postmodern Controversies , 2023 .

[20]  C. Malchow,et al.  The sexual life , 2022 .

[21]  Charlotte Brownlow,et al.  Ethical Issues for Qualitative Research in On-line Communities , 2002 .

[22]  J Elford,et al.  Use of gay Internet sites and views about online health promotion among men who have sex with men , 2004, AIDS care.

[23]  David Spitz,et al.  Contested Codes: The Social Construction of Napster , 2005, Inf. Soc..

[24]  P. Ricoeur Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences , 1981 .

[25]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[26]  Scholar,et al.  Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality , 1984 .

[27]  Alison Adam Gender, Ethics, and Information Technology , 2005 .

[28]  D. DeWitt,et al.  Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences , 2006 .

[29]  Jennifer Robertson,et al.  Same-sex cultures and Sexualities: an anthropological reader , 2005 .

[30]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Odd girl out: an individual differences perspective on women in the IT profession , 2002, Inf. Technol. People.

[31]  Robert Aunger,et al.  Cultural Transmission and Diffusion , 2006 .

[32]  Judith Halberstam,et al.  What's that Smell? , 2003 .

[33]  Ethel Spector Person,et al.  Sexuality as the Mainstay of Identity: Psychoanalytic Perspectives , 1980, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[34]  Andrew D. Brown,et al.  Constructing Organizational Identities on the Web: A Case Study of Royal Dutch/Shell* , 2004 .

[35]  H. Gadamer,et al.  Truth and Method , 1960 .

[36]  M. Mead,et al.  Coming of Age in Samoa , 1929 .

[37]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science , 2003 .

[38]  Steven G. Jones,et al.  Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee , 2004 .

[39]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[40]  Chris Beasley,et al.  Gender & sexuality : Critical theories, critical thinkers , 2005 .

[41]  Danny Miller,et al.  The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach , 2000 .

[42]  Steven Yearley,et al.  The SAGE Dictionary of Sociology , 2006 .

[43]  Jeffrey Weeks,et al.  Sexuality and Its Discontents: Meanings, Myths, and Modern Sexualities , 1985 .

[44]  Danny Miller Material Culture and Mass Consumption , 1987 .

[45]  Denise Carter,et al.  Living in virtual communities: an ethnography of human relationships in cyberspace , 2005 .

[46]  Diane Richardson,et al.  Sexuality and Gender , 2001 .