LIFT PERFORMANCE OF A TWIST MORPHING MAV WING

The manoeuvrability performance of a twist morphing MAV has been the main interest for the past researches. However, aerodynamic behaviour of a twist morphing wing is not fully explored due to limited MAV wing size, limited energy budgets, complicated morphing mechanism, and complex aerodynamic-wing structural interaction. Therefore, the effect of a twist morphing wing mobility on the lift distribution of MAV wing is still remained unknown. Thus, present work was carried out to compare the lift performance between a twist morphing wing with membrane and rigid MAV wing design. A quasi-static aeroelastic analysis by using the Ansys-Fluid Structure Interaction (FSI) method is utilized in current works to calculate the lift performance for each MAV wing design. Each MAV wing has identical wing dimension except for twist morphing wing where a 3N morphing force was imposed on the wing to produce the twist mobility. The lift results show that twist morphing wing able to produce (5% to 20%) higher lift magnitude compared to the membrane and rigid wing for every angle attack cases at pre-stall angle. However, twist morphing wing had slightly suffered from (at least 1°) earlier stall angle and produced almost similar maximum lift coefficient magnitude to the membrane wing

[1]  Srinivas Vasista,et al.  Realization of Morphing Wings: A Multidisciplinary Challenge , 2012 .

[2]  Wei Shyy,et al.  Fixed membrane wings for micro air vehicles: Experimental characterization, numerical modeling, and tailoring , 2008 .

[3]  Srijaya Mohan,et al.  Emerging technologies for micro unmanned air vehicles (Review Paper) , 2001 .

[4]  Tim Colonius,et al.  Control of vortex shedding on two- and three-dimensional aerofoils , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[5]  T. Daniel,et al.  The Journal of Experimental Biology 206, 2989-2997 © 2003 The Company of Biologists Ltd , 2003 .

[6]  Mohd Zulkifly Abdullah,et al.  Optimization of aerodynamic efficiency for twist morphing MAV wing , 2014 .

[7]  P. Seshaiyer,et al.  Computational Mechanics of a Coupled Flow-Structure Interaction Problem with Applications to Bio-Inspired Micro Air Vehicles , 2013 .

[8]  zhaolin chen Micro Air Vehicle Design for Aerodynamic Performance and flight Stability , 2014 .

[9]  T. Colonius,et al.  Effect of Tip Vortices in Low-Reynolds-Number Poststall Flow Control , 2009 .

[10]  Rosario Pecora,et al.  Effectiveness of Wing Twist Morphing in Roll Control , 2012 .

[11]  Eann A. Patterson Composite Materials and Joining Technologies for Composites , 2012 .

[12]  Srijaya Mohan,et al.  Emerging Technologies for Micro-Unmanned Air Vehicles , 2001 .

[13]  Mujahid Abdulrahim,et al.  Flight Characteristics of Shaping the Membrane Wing of a Micro Air Vehicle , 2005 .

[14]  Bret Kennedy Stanford,et al.  Aeroelastic analysis and optimization of membrane micro air vehicle wings , 2008 .

[15]  Abhijit Hiraman Supekar,et al.  Design, Analysis And Development Of A Morphable Wing Structure For Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Performance Augmentation , 2007 .

[16]  Mohd Zulkifly Abdullah,et al.  Computational aerodynamic analysis on perimeter reinforced (PR)-compliant wing , 2013 .