Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: extracorporeal circulation optimization and minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation system evolution

Treatment of aortic valve disease has become less and less invasive during the last years, thanks to progress in anesthesiology, surgical techniques, and perfusion management. In fact, it has been demonstrated that shorter skin incision, combined with ultra-fast-track anesthesia and minimized extracorporeal circuit could improve clinical outcomes. Current evidence shows that minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation system is associated with reduced red blood cells’ transfusion rate, improved end-organ perfusion, decreased incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, air embolism leakage, and so less cerebral accidents with better neurological outcomes. Moreover, the use of a closed circuit seems to be more physiologic for the patients, reducing systemic inflammatory response due to less air–blood contact and the use of biocompatible surfaces. In the literature, the benefits of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation are described mostly for coronary surgery but few data are nowadays available for minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation during aortic valve replacement. In this article, we describe our perfusion protocol in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.

[1]  S. Saha,et al.  Minimally invasive versus conventional extracorporeal circulation circuits in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a propensity-matched analysis , 2019, Perfusion.

[2]  M. Ranucci,et al.  Inflammation and coagulation following minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation technologies. , 2019, Journal of thoracic disease.

[3]  Hossein M. Zahedi,et al.  Ultra fast track surgery: a rapid deployment aortic valve replacement through a J-ministernotomy. , 2018, Journal of visualized surgery.

[4]  F. Oueida,et al.  Complete revascularization of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction using mini extracorporeal circulation , 2018 .

[5]  A. D’alfonso,et al.  Ultra fast-track minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: going beyond reduced incisions , 2018, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[6]  C. Asteriou,et al.  Haematological effects of minimized compared to conventional extracorporeal circulation after coronary revascularization procedures , 2010, Perfusion.

[7]  Y. Zorlutuna,et al.  Clinical evaluation of minimized extracorporeal circulation in high-risk coronary revascularization: impact on air handling, inflammation, hemodilution and myocardial function , 2009, Perfusion.

[8]  J. Albes,et al.  Comparison of minimally invasive closed circuit extracorporeal circulation with conventional cardiopulmonary bypass and with off-pump technique in CABG patients: selected parameters of coagulation and inflammatory system. , 2005, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[9]  J. Remadi,et al.  Prospective randomized study comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with the new mini-extracorporeal circulation Jostra System or with a standard cardiopulmonary bypass. , 2006, American heart journal.