Valuing environmental goods and services using benefit transfer: The state-of-the art and science

Abstract The purpose of this special issue of Ecological Economics is to elucidate the state-of-the-art and science of environmental benefit transfer and to assist in the design and reporting of future benefit estimation research. Compiling the insights of thirty-two international experts from seven countries, the special issue reviews the latest developments in transfer techniques, as well as ongoing efforts to standardize and validate them. Taken together, the papers in this special issue provide fresh answers to some long-standing questions, offer original research insights on state-of-the-art issues and identify fruitful areas for future research. This introductory paper provides background and context for the issues addressed by the contributing authors. Its purpose is to place the interdisciplinary thinking contained here in a comparative context, highlighting the need for integration and collaboration to maintain the momentum that has propelled environmental benefit transfer into a widely used approach for estimating the economic value of environmental goods and services worldwide.

[1]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Valuing watershed services: concepts and empirics from southeast Asia , 2004 .

[2]  Jeffrey Bennett,et al.  Valuing New South Wales Rivers for Use in Benefit Transfer , 2004 .

[3]  J. Loomis,et al.  Meta-Analytic Benefit Transfer of Outdoor Recreation Economic Values: Testing Out-of-Sample Convergent Validity , 2003 .

[4]  Dominic Moran,et al.  Spatial economic valuation : Benefits transfer using geographical information systems , 1996 .

[5]  S. Navrud.  Valuing Health Impacts from Air Pollution in Europe , 2001 .

[6]  Austin Troy,et al.  The Economic Geography of Ecosystem Goods and Services , 2004 .

[7]  J. C. van den Bergh,et al.  Meta-analysis of Environmental Issues in Regional, Urban and Transport Economics , 1997 .

[8]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  Benefit transfer studies: Myths, pragmatism, and idealism , 1992 .

[9]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Developing a Methodology for Benefit Transfers Using Geographical Information Systems: Modelling Demand for Woodland Recreation , 1999 .

[10]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Improving Benefit Transfer Demand Functions: A GIS Approach , 1997 .

[11]  J. Bergstrom,et al.  Status of Benefits Transfer in the United States and Canada: Reply , 1999 .

[12]  Roy Brouwer,et al.  The Validity of Environmental Benefits Transfer: Further Empirical Testing , 1999 .

[13]  W. Martin,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of the benefit transfer method: a rural water supply application in the USA. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Is Meta-Analysis a Noah's Ark for Non-Market Valuation? , 2002 .

[15]  R. G. Walsh,et al.  Review of outdoor recreation economic demand studies with nonmarket benefit estimates, 1968-1988 , 2007 .

[16]  Yong-Suhk Wui,et al.  The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis , 2001 .

[17]  F. Hitzhusen,et al.  Status of Benefits Transfer in the United States and Canada: Comment , 2001 .

[18]  Helen R. Neill,et al.  Benefit Transfers: Conceptual and Empirical Issues , 1992 .

[19]  S. V. Ciriacy-Wantrup,et al.  Resource Conservation: Economics and Policies , 1954 .

[20]  Julii Brainard,et al.  Integrating geographical information systems into travel cost analysis and benefit transfer , 1999, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[21]  V. Kerry Smith,et al.  Signals or Noise? Explaining the Variation in Recreation Benefit Estimates , 1990 .

[22]  George Van Houtven,et al.  Benefit Transfer via Preference Calibration: “Prudential Algebra” for Policy , 2002, Land Economics.

[23]  Francisco J. Vázquez-Polo,et al.  A Bayesian model for benefit transfer: application to national parks in Spain , 2002 .

[24]  F. Reed Johnson,et al.  Benefits and costs of pulp and paper effluent controls under the Clean Water Act , 1992 .

[25]  George R. Parsons,et al.  Benefits transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies , 1992 .

[26]  R. Moss,et al.  Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment , 2003 .

[27]  Martin Dieterich,et al.  Cultural Landscapes and Land Use , 2004 .

[28]  S. Mourato,et al.  Transferring the benefits of avoided health effects from water pollution between Portugal and Costa Rica , 2003, Environment and Development Economics.

[29]  John B. Loomis,et al.  The Evolution of a More Rigorous Approach to Benefit Transfer: Benefit Function Transfer , 1992 .

[30]  Roy Brouwer,et al.  Benefits transfer of willingness to pay estimates and functions for health-risk reductions: a cross-country study. , 2005, Journal of health economics.

[31]  H. Seip,et al.  The environmental cost of water pollution in Chongqing, China , 2001, Environment and Development Economics.

[32]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Contrasting conventional with multi-level modelling approaches to meta-analysis: expectation consistency in UK woodland recreation values. , 2003 .

[33]  D. Kristófersson,et al.  Validity Tests of Benefit Transfer – Are We Performing the Wrong Tests? , 2005 .

[34]  J. Robinson.  Environmental value transfer: an application for the South East Queensland waterways. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[35]  Peter A. Groothuis.  Benefit Transfer: A Comparison of Approaches , 2005 .

[36]  W. Viscusi.  The Value of Life: Estimates with Risks by Occupation and Industry , 2003 .

[37]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Using meta‐analysis for benefit transfer: In‐sample convergent validity tests of an outdoor recreation database , 2000 .

[38]  V. Smith,et al.  On separating defensible benefit transfers from “smoke and mirrors” , 1992 .

[39]  W. Griffiths,et al.  Carnarvon Gorge: a comment on the sensitivity of consumer surplus estimation , 1998 .

[40]  Kenneth E. McConnell,et al.  Model building and judgment: Implications for benefit transfers with travel cost models , 1992 .

[41]  J. Loomis,et al.  Empirical estimates of amenity forest values: a comparative review. , 1984 .

[42]  Russell Blamey,et al.  Choice Modeling and Tests of Benefit Transfer , 2002 .