Evolvement of Rank-Size Distribution of Regional Container Ports: Case Study of Yangtze River Delta of China

Regional container port operation plays a crucial role in international trade and economic development. Amid fierce competition, orderly running of regional ports is vital. The rank-size status of the regional container ports indicates the orderliness and distribution concentration of port system development and is the focus of port administrations and port operators. This paper introduces the rank-size distribution rule into studies on the development of regional container port systems and proves that Zipf’s three-parameter model can effectively describe the evolvement of the rank-size system of regional container ports, taking the container port group in the Yangtze River Delta as an example. This paper finds that the regional container ports tend to become concentrated in high ranks during evolvement. Moreover, the macroeconomic environment has a great impact on the distribution concentration of regional container ports. Economic procyclicality can accelerate port concentration. On the other hand, economic counter-cyclicality will induce port decentralization. The results of this paper are conducive to port administrations and enterprises to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the development of regional container ports and to formulate the proper development plans. The results are also helpful for government departments to well design the development strategies for port and shipping development and better steer the benign development of regional container port groups.

[1]  Shi-lun Yang,et al.  Decadal morphological evolution of the Yangtze Estuary in response to river input changes and estuarine engineering projects , 2016 .

[2]  Iris F. A. Vis,et al.  Port supply chain integration: analyzing biofuel supply chains , 2016 .

[3]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  A multi-criteria approach to dry port location in developing economies with application to Vietnam , 2016 .

[4]  Geraldine Knatz,et al.  How competition is driving change in port governance, strategic decision-making and government policy in the United States , 2017 .

[5]  J. Lam Strategy of a Transhipment Hub: The Case of Port of Singapore , 2016 .

[6]  T. Notteboom,et al.  The Greening of Terminal Concessions in Seaports , 2018, Sustainability.

[7]  Yanguang Chen The evolution of Zipf’s law indicative of city development , 2015, 1504.04229.

[8]  Dusan Ku,et al.  On double cycling for container port productivity improvement , 2016, Ann. Oper. Res..

[9]  Qiang Meng,et al.  Shipping efficiency comparison between Northern Sea Route and the conventional Asia-Europe shipping route via Suez Canal , 2016 .

[10]  Kechar Bouabdellah,et al.  Cooperation between Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles to enhance container terminal operations , 2016, J. Innov. Digit. Ecosyst..

[11]  Mireya Solís Global economic crisis: boon or bust for East Asian trade integration? , 2011 .

[12]  Young-Tae Chang,et al.  Measuring port efficiency using bootstrapped DEA: the case of Vietnamese ports , 2016 .

[13]  Zheng Wan,et al.  Operational Efficiency Evaluation of Iron Ore Logistics at the Ports of Bohai Bay in China: Based on the PCA-DEA Model , 2016 .

[14]  Gabriel Adetoye ERGONOMIC EVALUATION AND LABOUR INSPECTION IN CLUSTER-SAWMILL IN PORT HARCOURT , NIGERIA , 2016 .

[15]  Yanguang Chen,et al.  The mathematical relationship between Zipf’s law and the hierarchical scaling law , 2012 .

[16]  Baohua Mao,et al.  A game-theoretical approach for modeling competitions in a maritime supply chain , 2016 .

[17]  Mariagrazia Dotoli,et al.  A Timed Petri Nets Model for Performance Evaluation of Intermodal Freight Transport Terminals , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[18]  G. Wilmsmeier,et al.  Institutional structure and agency in the governance of spatial diversification of port system evolution in Latin America , 2016 .

[19]  Jie Wu,et al.  Performance evaluation of Chinese port enterprises under significant environmental concerns: An extended DEA-based analysis , 2017 .

[20]  Mike Douglass,et al.  Mega-urban Regions and World City Formation: Globalisation, the Economic Crisis and Urban Policy Issues in Pacific Asia , 2000 .

[21]  Hui Shan Loh,et al.  Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of port-centric supply chain disruption threats , 2017 .

[22]  Jacqueline Boulos Sustainable Development of Coastal Cities-Proposal of a Modelling Framework to Achieve Sustainable City-Port Connectivity☆ , 2016 .

[23]  A. Ng,et al.  Regional Transformation and Port Cluster Competition: The Case of the Pearl River Delta in South China , 2016 .

[24]  M. Luo,et al.  A game theory analysis of port specialization—implications to the Chinese port industry , 2014 .

[25]  Qingcheng Zeng,et al.  Impact of the Carat Canal on the evolution of hub ports under China’s Belt and Road initiative , 2017, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

[26]  Ronald Apriliyanto Halim,et al.  A strategic model of port-hinterland freight distribution networks , 2016 .

[27]  T. Notteboom,et al.  Port Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Competitive Forces, Port Reform, and Investment Challenges , 2016 .

[28]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Methodological Advances in Gibrat’s and Zipf’s Laws: A Comparative Empirical Study on the Evolution of Urban Systems , 2017 .

[29]  Wei Zhang,et al.  An empirical analysis of maritime cluster evolution from the port development perspective - Cases of London and Hong Kong , 2017 .

[30]  Xavier Gabaix,et al.  Power Laws in Economics and Finance , 2009 .

[31]  Zheng Wan,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of the development performances of typical free trade port zones in China , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[32]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Greening ports and maritime logistics: A review , 2016 .

[33]  L. M. Lugt,et al.  Institutional reforms of port authorities in the Netherlands; the establishment of port development companies , 2017 .

[34]  J. Debrie,et al.  The port–city relationships in two European inland ports: A geographical perspective on urban governance , 2016 .

[35]  Shih-Liang Chao,et al.  Gate automation system evaluation A case of a container number recognition system in port terminals , 2017 .

[36]  Pedro Antão,et al.  Identification of Occupational Health, Safety, Security (OHSS) and Environmental Performance Indicators in port areas , 2016 .

[37]  Hong Chen,et al.  Developing a model for measuring the resilience of a port-hinterland container transportation network , 2017 .

[38]  S. P. Strandenes,et al.  Norwegian port connectivity and its policy implications , 2017 .

[39]  Pascal Kany Prud’ome Gamassa,et al.  Comparison of port efficiency between Eastern and Western African ports using DEA Window Analysis , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management.

[40]  Yapa Mahinda Bandara,et al.  Non-price competition in the port sector: A case study of ports in Turkey , 2016 .

[41]  Ahmed Mohamed Ezzat,et al.  Sustainable Development of Seaport Cities through Circular Economy: A Comparative Study with Implications to Suez Canal Corridor Project , 2016 .