Investigating the effect of key factors, their interactions and optimization of naphtha steam cracking by statistical design of experiments

The effect of temperature, steam-to-naphtha ratio, and residence time and their quadratic and cubic interactions on the yield of light olefins (ethylene and propylene) in naphtha steam cracking has been investigated. The temperature, steam-to-naphtha ratio, and residence time were varied in the range 1053–1153 K, 0.5–0.9 g/g, and 0.15–0.4 s, respectively. Based on the experimental results, naphtha steam cracking was modeled by use of statistical design of experiments (DoE). The results for the successful multiobjective optimization (MOO) of the naphtha steam cracking have also been reported. The new developed model is employed for the optimization purposes. Two MOO problems are solved; these problems involved maximization of ethylene, propylene and selectivity and minimization of severity. The response defined by the three most significant parameters was obtained from full factorial design and the optimal parameter set was found. The superiority of the DoE method over the conventional change one separate factor at a time approach is shown by the fact that we were able to study the higher interactions and optimize three individual factors with only 27 runs.

[1]  D. Kunzru,et al.  Catalytic pyrolysis of naphtha , 1992 .

[2]  Jafar Towfighi,et al.  Simulation, optimization and control of a thermal cracking furnace , 2006 .

[3]  Gade Pandu Rangaiah,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization of an Industrial Ethylene Reactor Using a Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm , 2005 .

[4]  L. Harmon,et al.  Experiment planning for combinatorial materials discovery , 2003 .

[5]  Determination of yield distribution in olefin production by thermal cracking of atmospheric gasoil , 2008 .

[6]  R. Karimzadeh,et al.  Steam Cracking of Naphtha in Packed Bed Reactors , 2002 .

[7]  Thong Ngee Goh,et al.  A pragmatic approach to experimental design in industry , 2001 .

[8]  Alex E. S. Green,et al.  Systematics and modeling representations of naphtha thermal cracking for olefin production , 2005 .

[9]  V. Veselý,et al.  Steam cracking of hydrocarbons 3. Straight-run naphtha , 1980 .

[10]  Jafar Towfighi,et al.  Modeling of thermal cracking of LPG: Application of artificial neural network in prediction of the main product yields , 2007 .

[11]  D. Kunzru,et al.  Modeling of naphtha pyrolysis , 1985 .

[12]  Petr Zamostny,et al.  Identification of kinetic models of heterogeneously catalyzed reactions , 2002 .

[13]  Ákos Kukovecz,et al.  Optimization of CCVD synthesis conditions for single-wall carbon nanotubes by statistical design of experiments (DoE) , 2005 .

[14]  Gilbert F. Froment,et al.  Scaling up of naphtha cracking coils , 1981 .

[15]  G. Müller,et al.  Adjustment of the Band Gap Energies of Biostabilized CdS Nanoparticles by Application of Statistical Design of Experiments , 2004 .

[16]  Xiaorong He,et al.  Multi-objective optimization for the periodic operation of the naphtha pyrolysis process using a new parallel hybrid algorithm combining NSGA-II with SQP , 2008, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[17]  Kevin Van Geem,et al.  Two Severity Indices for Scale-Up of Steam Cracking Coils , 2005 .

[18]  K. Rostamizadeh,et al.  The Use of ANN and the Mathematical Model for Prediction of the Main Product Yields in the Thermal Cracking of Naphtha , 2007 .

[19]  Zhiqiang Geng,et al.  Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization Hybrid Algorithm: An Application on Industrial Cracking Furnace , 2007 .