Commercial Assay Systems for Detecting Foodborne Salmonella : A Review.

Recent advances in diagnostic technology have dramatically altered testing methods for foodborne Salmonella . Many commercial assay systems and kits that use newer technologies are now available to facilitate the identification of Salmonella in foods. These systems include miniaturized biochemical tests, new media formulations, automated instrumentation, DNA probe- and antibody-dependent assays. The technologies used for each system, except miniaturized biochemical tests, are described, and the various assay kit formats are compared. A selected number of comparative studies using foods are discussed. Most commercial assay systems are rapid, simple, and equally as sensitive as standard methods for the detection of Salmonella species.

[1]  D. Halbert,et al.  Comparative study of colorimetric DNA hybridization method and conventional culture procedure for detection of Salmonella in foods. , 1990, Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

[2]  A. Rambach New plate medium for facilitated differentiation of Salmonella spp. from Proteus spp. and other enteric bacteria , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[3]  R. Fitts,et al.  DNA-DNA hybridization assay for detection of Salmonella spp. in foods , 1983, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[4]  M. Curiale,et al.  Comparison of colorimetric monoclonal enzyme immunoassay screening methods for detection of Salmonella in foods. , 1990, Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

[5]  D. Halbert,et al.  Development of a Colorimetric, Second Generation Nucleic Acid Hybridization Method For Detection of Salmonella in Foods and a Comparison With Conventional Culture Procedure , 1990 .

[6]  M. Curiale,et al.  Colorimetric deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization assay for rapid screening of Salmonella in foods: collaborative study. , 1990, Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

[7]  A. Freydiere,et al.  Detection of salmonellae by using Rambach agar and by a C8 esterase spot test , 1991, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[8]  S. C. Richardson,et al.  Comparison of the TECRA Salmonella Immunoassay with the conventional culture method , 1990 .

[9]  Valerie J St Clair,et al.  Performance of Three Methods for the Rapid Identification of Salmonella in Naturally Contaminated Foods and Feeds. , 1990, Journal of food protection.

[10]  B. Rose,et al.  Evaluation of a Colorimetric DNA Hybridization Test for Detection of Salmonellae in Meat and Poultry Products. , 1991, Journal of food protection.

[11]  P. Wolber,et al.  Detection of bacteria by transduction of ice nucleation genes. , 1990, Trends in biotechnology.

[12]  R. Flowers,et al.  Visual immunoassay for detection of Salmonella in foods: collaborative study. , 1988, Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

[13]  C. J. Randall,et al.  Modified 1-2 Test™ System as a Rapid Screening Method for Detection of Salmonella in Foods and Feeds. , 1990, Journal of food protection.

[14]  E. Mallinson,et al.  Xylose-lysine-tergitol 4: an improved selective agar medium for the isolation of Salmonella. , 1991, Poultry science.

[15]  T. Wilson,et al.  Gene Detection Technology Opens Doors for Many Industries , 1983, Bio/Technology.

[16]  J. D'aoust,et al.  Reliability of the Immunodiffusion 1-2 Test™ System for Detection of Salmonella in Foods. , 1988, Journal of food protection.

[17]  P. Wolber,et al.  New rapid method for the detection of Salmonella in foods. , 1990 .

[18]  M. Curiale,et al.  Detection of Salmonellae and Other Enterobacteriaceae by Commercial Deoxyribonucleic Acid Hybridization and Enzyme Immunoassay Kits. , 1990, Journal of food protection.

[19]  R. Flowers,et al.  Immunodiffusion screening method for detection of motile Salmonella in foods: collaborative study. , 1989, Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

[20]  P. Entis,et al.  Rapid Detection of Salmonella in Foods Using EF-18 Agar in Conjunction with the Hydrophobic Grid Membrane Filter. , 1991, Journal of food protection.

[21]  A. C. Baird‐Parker,et al.  Comparative evaluation of the Oxoid Salmonella Rapid Test with three other rapid salmonella methods , 1989 .

[22]  N. Bean,et al.  Foodborne Disease Outbreaks, 5-Year Summary, 1983-1987. , 1990, Journal of food protection.

[23]  R. Gruenewald,et al.  Use of Rambach Propylene Glycol Containing Agar for identification of Salmonella spp , 1991, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[24]  M. Curiale,et al.  Comparative Study of a DNA Hybridization Method and the Conventional Culture Procedure for Detection of Salmonella in Foods , 1987 .

[25]  P. Wolber,et al.  Molecular aspects of microbial ice nucleation , 1991, Molecular microbiology.

[26]  M. Colberg,et al.  Comparison of the DNA Probe to Culture Methods for the Detection of Salmonella on Poultry Carcasses and Processing Waters 1. , 1989, Journal of food protection.

[27]  L. V. Poucke,et al.  Salmonella-TEK, a rapid screening method for Salmonella species in food. , 1990 .

[28]  M T Knight,et al.  Gram-negative identification card for identification of Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and other Enterobacteriaceae isolated from foods: collaborative study. , 1990, Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

[29]  G. Salvat,et al.  Rapid detection of Salmonella from poultry meat products using the ‘1. 2. Test®’ , 1990 .