Transition of bioeconomy as a key concept for the agriculture and agribusiness development: An extensive review on ASEAN countries

Transition of bioeconomy plays an important role in the development of any economy. Therefore, the purpose of the current paper is to review the key concept of transition of the bioeconomy in the ASEAN economies that is considered to be an innovative collective method for observing the operation of national economies' numerous sectors that produce and process biological wealth. Based on current literature, it has been reviewed that the transition of bioeconomy is being presented with respect to the theoretical concept, and their essence and bioeconomy size, and the challenges and risks which are related to the bioeconomy transition. The various ways and the area of action along with present strategies which are supporting the development of bio economies and their relationship with the circular economies model had been presented. It was seen in the literature that ASEAN agricultures sectors had been contributing their major part in the development of value-added products and employment, except for Malaysia, Thailand, and Laos. Moreover, the analysis results had also shown that the transition of bioeconomy is considered to be an important concept in the growth of agriculture, forestry, agribusiness, and various sectors that produce and use bio-based raw materials. It was further found that for real bio-economy opportunities, it is essential that there should be a proper national and regional strategy for the bioeconomy development in place and for the development of a proper design and proper management coordination at every level of sectors, enterprises, and provincial systems.

[1]  R. Zhou,et al.  Environmental risk of multi-year polythene film mulching and its green solution in arid irrigation region. , 2022, Journal of hazardous materials.

[2]  C. Pek,et al.  AGRICULTURAL MULTIFUNCTIONALITY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN MALAYSIA: A CONTINGENT VALUATION METHOD APPROACH , 2022, Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture.

[3]  M. Mwale,et al.  THE ROLE OF SUPPORT ORGANISATIONS IN PROMOTING ORGANIC FARMING INNOVATIONS AND SUSTAINABILITY , 2022, Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture.

[4]  Ritika Chopra,et al.  The role of renewable energy and natural resources for sustainable agriculture in ASEAN countries: Do carbon emissions and deforestation affect agriculture productivity? , 2022, Resources Policy.

[5]  K. Krishnani,et al.  Circular bioeconomy for stress-resilient fisheries and aquaculture , 2022, Biomass, Biofuels, Biochemicals.

[6]  M. Torero,et al.  The global cost of reaching a world without hunger: Investment costs and policy action opportunities , 2021, Food Policy.

[7]  R. Purwono,et al.  THE EFFECT OF CORRUPTION PERCEPTION INDEX ON DIRECT FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN ASEAN , 2021 .

[8]  Wen-Tsao Pan,et al.  Research on sustainable development and efficiency of China's E-Agriculture based on a data envelopment analysis-Malmquist model , 2021 .

[9]  M. Adamowicz.  BIOECONOMY AS A CONCEPT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND AGRIBUSINESS , 2020, Problems of Agricultural Economics.

[10]  M. Smol,et al.  Bioeconomy as One of the Key Areas of Implementing a Circular Economy (CE) in Poland , 2020, Environmental Research, Engineering and Management.

[11]  Economic Indicators for Southeast Asia and the Pacific: , 2020 .

[12]  R. Quitzow,et al.  Studying the Transition towards a Circular Bioeconomy—A Systematic Literature Review on Transition Studies and Existing Barriers , 2020, Sustainability.

[13]  K. Refsgaard,et al.  Bioeconomy - a driver for regional development in the Nordic countries. , 2020, New biotechnology.

[14]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Bioeconomy futures: Expectation patterns of scientists and practitioners on the sustainability of bio‐based transformation , 2020 .

[15]  M. Awasthi,et al.  Refining biomass residues for sustainable energy and bio-products: An assessment of technology, its importance, and strategic applications in circular bio-economy , 2020 .

[16]  Saleh Shahriar,et al.  Relative export competitiveness of the Cambodian rice sector , 2020 .

[17]  M. Lier,et al.  The Contribution of Sustainable Development Goals and Forest-Related Indicators to National Bioeconomy Progress Monitoring , 2020, Sustainability.

[18]  F. X. Johnson,et al.  Policy dialogue on a bioeconomy for sustainable development in Thailand , 2020 .

[19]  M. Abdullah,et al.  Halal Industry in ASEAN , 2020 .

[20]  Guangming Zeng,et al.  Biochar for environmental management: Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, contaminant treatment, and potential negative impacts , 2019, Chemical Engineering Journal.

[21]  D. Štreimikienė,et al.  Evaluation of bioeconomy in the context of strong sustainability , 2019, Sustainable Development.

[22]  Armenia Androniceanu.  Social Responsibility, an Essential Strategic Option for a Sustainable Development in the Field of Bio-Economy , 2019, www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro.

[23]  A. Aguilar,et al.  Bioeconomy for Sustainable Development , 2019, Biotechnology journal.

[24]  P. Garrido,et al.  Transition to a bioeconomy: Perspectives from social sciences , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[25]  Merve Burçak Ketene.  Bioeconomy: Shaping the transition to a sustainable, biobased economy, edited by Iris Lewandowski (Springer, 2018) , 2019, Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy.

[26]  Z. Yusop,et al.  REVEALED COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE AND COMPETITIVENESS OF BROILER MEAT PRODUCTS IN MALAYSIA AND SELECTED EXPORTING COUNTRIES , 2019 .

[27]  D. Diakosavvas,et al.  Bio-economy and the sustainability of the agriculture and food system , 2019, OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers.

[28]  Pietro Goglio,et al.  The potential roles of bio-economy in the transition to equitable, sustainable, post fossil-carbon societies: Findings from this virtual special issue , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[29]  Regina Birner,et al.  Bioeconomy , 2018, Springer International Publishing.

[30]  Elistia Elistia,et al.  THE CORRELATION OF THE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX (HDI) TOWARDS ECONOMIC GROWTH (GDP PER CAPITA) IN 10 ASEAN MEMBER COUNTRIES , 2018, JHSS (JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL STUDIES).

[31]  M. Nurunnabi,et al.  The effects of corporate governance on environmental sustainability reporting: empirical evidence from South Asian countries , 2018, Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility.

[32]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Governance of the Bioeconomy: A Global Comparative Study of National Bioeconomy Strategies , 2018, Sustainability.

[33]  Laxman Adhikari,et al.  Dissecting Key Adaptation Traits in the Polyploid Perennial Medicago sativa Using GBS-SNP Mapping , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[34]  Raphael Asada,et al.  Competitive Bioeconomy? Comparing Bio-based and Non-bio-based Primary Sectors of the World , 2018, Ecological Economics.

[35]  Alfredo Aguilar,et al.  The origins of the bioeconomy in the European Union. , 2018, New biotechnology.

[36]  M. Giacca,et al.  Biotechnology and the bioeconomy-Towards inclusive and sustainable industrial development. , 2018, New biotechnology.

[37]  Christoph Häuser,et al.  A review of biodiversity-related issues and challenges in megadiverse Indonesia and other Southeast Asian countries , 2017 .

[38]  Bin Tu,et al.  Assessing the Agricultural Competitive Advantage by the RTA index: A Case Study in Vietnam , 2017 .

[39]  Narumon Saardchom.  Bioeconomy as a new S-curve for Thai economy , 2017 .

[40]  N. Rozana.  Competitiveness of Malaysia ’ s Fruits in the Global Market : Revealed Comparative Advantage Analysis , 2017 .

[41]  Alexandra Leitão,et al.  Bioeconomy: The Challenge in the Management of Natural Resources in the 21st Century , 2016 .

[42]  Paulina Tuka,et al.  Wyzwania biogospodarki względem wskaźników zrównoważonego rozwoju Unii Europejskiej , 2016 .

[43]  M. Ismail,et al.  Consistency tests of comparative advantage measures: an empirical evidence from the Malaysian and selected Asian shrimp products , 2016 .

[44]  K. McCormick,et al.  Towards a Bioeconomy in Europe: National, Regional and Industrial Strategies , 2015 .

[45]  N. Scarlat,et al.  The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: Policies and facts , 2015 .

[46]  N. Kamal,et al.  Accelerating the Growth of Bioeconomy in Malaysia , 2015 .

[47]  Gemma U. Reyes.  Examining the Revealed Comparative Advantage of the ASEAN 6 Countries Using the Balassa Index and Lafay Index , 2014 .

[48]  J. Lingard,et al.  The export competitiveness of the tuna industry in Thailand , 2013 .

[49]  K. McCormick,et al.  Strategies and Policies for the Bioeconomy and Bio-Based Economy: An Analysis of Official National Approaches , 2013 .

[50]  Kes McCormick,et al.  The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview , 2013 .

[51]  L. Levidow,et al.  Divergent Paradigms of European Agro-Food Innovation , 2013 .

[52]  M. Maciejczak,et al.  How to Define Bioeconomy , 2013 .

[53]  J. Gołębiewski,et al.  VALUE CHAINS WITHIN BIOECONOMY , 2013 .

[54]  H. Rohracher,et al.  Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change , 2012 .

[55]  S. Padel,et al.  The bio-economy concept and knowledge base in a public goods and farmer perspective , 2012 .

[56]  B. Sarathchandran,et al.  India-ASEAN free trade agreement: Implications for fisheries , 2012 .

[57]  N. Waramit.  Developing a bioeconomy in Thailand. , 2012 .

[58]  A. Aguilar,et al.  European Union research and innovation perspectives on biotechnology. , 2011, Journal of biotechnology.

[59]  R. Wyse.  Building Business in a Green Bioeconomy , 2011 .

[60]  Giorgos Kallis,et al.  Environmental innovation and societal transitions: Introduction and overview , 2011 .

[61]  F. Fressin,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER. II. ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST FOUR MONTHS OF DATA , 2011, 1102.0541.

[62]  S. Nebe.  Bio-based economy in Europe: state of play and future potential - Part 2 Summary of position papers received in response to the European Commission\'s public on-line consultation , 2011 .

[63]  F. Egberink,et al.  ASEAN and Strategic Rivalry among the Great Powers in Asia , 2010 .

[64]  Dr. Sarath Chandran.  Trade Complementarity and Similarity Between India and ASEAN Countries in the Context of the RTA , 2010 .

[65]  J. Rotmans,et al.  The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases , 2010 .

[66]  Michael Oborne,et al.  The bioeconomy to 2030: designing a policy agenda , 2010 .

[67]  Timothy J. Foxon,et al.  Governing long-term social–ecological change: what can the adaptive management and transition management approaches learn from each other? , 2009 .

[68]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands , 2008 .

[69]  Osman M. Karatepe,et al.  The effect of management commitment to service quality on employees’ affective and performance outcomes , 2003 .

[70]  H. Waters,et al.  The impact of the 1997-98 East Asian economic crisis on health and health care in Indonesia. , 2003, Health policy and planning.

[71]  J. Enríquez.  Genomics and the World's Economy , 1998, Science.

[72]  D. Kirk,et al.  Demographic transition theory. , 1996, Population studies.

[73]  Henry C. Tuckwell,et al.  World population , 1992, Nature.

[74]  En Route to the Knowledge-based Bio-economy En Route to the Knowledge-based Bio-economy (kbbe) Contents , 2022 .