A discussion of the use of the sustainability index: 'ecological footprint' for aquaculture production

This paper critically reviews the theoretical and practical implications of adopting the original ‘ecological footprint’ concept as an index of the sustainability of aquaculture production systems. It is argued that the concept may provide a reasonable visioning tool to demonstrate natural resource dependence of human activities to politicians and the public at large. However, due to its inherent weaknesses, the ‘ecological footprint’ fails to provide a cohesive analytical tool for management. From an ecological perspective, its two-dimensional interpretation of complex ecologically and economically interacting systems is one major weakness. From an economic perspective, the ‘footprint’ fails to recognise factors such as consumer preferences and property rights which have a major influence on the allocation and sustainable use of resources. The interactions among social, ecological and economic factors are discussed in an attempt to foster a broader inter-disciplinary view of criteria required for a sustainable use of aquatic resources.

[1]  Pamela A. Matson,et al.  HUMAN APPROPRIATION OF THE PRODUCTS OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS , 1986 .

[2]  C. Folke,et al.  THE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT CONCEPT FOR SUSTAINABLE SEAFOOD PRODUCTION: A REVIEW , 1998 .

[3]  N. Hanley,et al.  Environmental Economics: In Theory and Practice , 1996 .

[4]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[5]  D. Pearce,et al.  Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability , 1993 .

[6]  Joachim H. Spangenberg,et al.  Towards sustainable Europe , 1996 .

[7]  R. Turner,et al.  Integrating natural and socio-economic science in coastal management , 2000 .

[8]  M. Wackernagel,et al.  Our ecological footprint , 1996 .

[9]  Ian Moffatt,et al.  Measuring sustainability: A time series of alternative indicators for Scotland , 1999 .

[10]  N. Vestergaard,et al.  Property rights in fishing; Effects on the industry and effectiveness for fishing management policy , 1997 .

[11]  Ross Cullen,et al.  New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy , 1998 .

[12]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[13]  M. Jobling.  Sustainable Aquaculture: Food for the Future?: N. Svennevig, H. Reinertsen and M. New (Editors). A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam (1999). 348pp., price: 85 euro,ISBN: 90-5809-097-3 , 2000 .

[14]  H. Mooney,et al.  Nature's Subsidies to Shrimp and Salmon Farming , 1998, Science.

[15]  Carl Folke,et al.  Ecological limitations and appropriation of ecosystem support by shrimp farming in Colombia , 1994 .

[16]  I. Bateman,et al.  Coastal Management for Sustainable Development: Analysing Environmental and Socio-Economic Changes on the UK Coast , 1998 .

[17]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Rediscovering place and accounting space: how to re-embed the human economy , 1999 .

[18]  R. Gowen,et al.  The Costs of Eutrophication from Salmon Farming: Implications for Policy—A Comment , 1997 .

[19]  John M. Hartwick,et al.  Natural Resources, National Accounting and Economic Depreciation , 1990 .

[20]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Ecosystems and nature : economics, science and policy , 1999 .

[21]  C. Folke,et al.  Ecological footprint for assessment of resource use and development limitations in shrimp and tilapia aquaculture , 1997 .

[22]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Ecological Footprints and Appropriated Carrying Capacity: Measuring the Natural Capital Requirements of the Human Economy. , 1996 .

[23]  J. Bergh,et al.  Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’ , 1999 .

[24]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Investing in natural capital: the ecological economics approach to sustainability. , 1994 .

[25]  Gene Bazan.  Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth , 1997 .

[26]  R. Turner,et al.  Managing a Sea: The Ecological Economics of the Baltic , 2000 .