A new, vapour-phase mechanism for stomatal responses to humidity and temperature.

A new mechanism for stomatal responses to humidity and temperature is proposed. Unlike previously-proposed mechanisms, which rely on liquid water transport to create water potential gradients within the leaf, the new mechanism assumes that water transport to the guard cells is primarily through the vapour phase. Under steady-state conditions, guard cells are assumed to be in near-equilibrium with the water vapour in the air near the bottom of the stomatal pore. As the water potential of this air varies with changing air humidity and leaf temperature, the resultant changes in guard cell water potential produce stomatal movements. A simple, closed-form, mathematical model based on this idea is derived. The new model is parameterized for a previously published set of data and is shown to fit the data as well as or better than existing models. The model contains mathematical elements that are consistent with previously-proposed mechanistic models based on liquid flow as well as empirical models based on relative humidity. As such, it provides a mechanistic explanation for the realm of validity for each of these approaches.

[1]  Nicanor Z. Saliendra,et al.  Influence of leaf water status on stomatal response to humidity, hydraulic conductance, and soil drought in Betula occidentalis , 1995, Planta.

[2]  Joseph C. Shope,et al.  Stomatal responses to humidity in isolated epidermes. , 2008, Plant, cell & environment.

[3]  J. Comstock,et al.  The temperature dependence of shoot hydraulic resistance: implications for stomatal behaviour and hydraulic limitation , 2001 .

[4]  Roland Pieruschka,et al.  Control of transpiration by radiation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  R. Leuning.  A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal‐photosynthesis model for C3 plants , 1995 .

[6]  N. Holbrook,et al.  Hydraulic design of leaves: insights from rehydration kinetics. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[7]  D. F. Parkhurst,et al.  Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox , 1991 .

[8]  N. Holbrook,et al.  The hydraulic conductance of the angiosperm leaf lamina: a comparison of three measurement methods. , 2002, Journal of experimental botany.

[9]  John L. Monteith,et al.  A reinterpretation of stomatal responses to humidity , 1995 .

[10]  Calculation of the Molecular Diameters from Sutherland's Constant , 1951 .

[11]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  A study of stomatal mechanics using the cell pressure probe , 1998 .

[12]  Patrick Meir,et al.  Evidence from Amazonian forests is consistent with isohydric control of leaf water potential. , 2006, Plant, cell & environment.

[13]  G. Farquhar.  Feedforward Responses of Stomata to Humidity , 1978 .

[14]  K. Mott.  Leaf hydraulic conductivity and stomatal responses to humidity in amphistomatous leaves. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[15]  François Tardieu,et al.  Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours , 1998 .

[16]  D. Velic,et al.  A model for estimating the surface effective mass during collision-induced processes on Pt{111} , 1997 .

[17]  A. Fredeen,et al.  Temperature and humidity effects on branchlet gas-exchange in white spruce: an explanation for the increase in transpiration with branchlet temperature , 1999, Trees.

[18]  M. Tyree,et al.  The kinetics of rehydration of detached sunflower leaves from different initial water deficits , 1981 .

[19]  T. Buckley,et al.  The control of stomata by water balance. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[20]  I. E. Woodrow,et al.  A Model Predicting Stomatal Conductance and its Contribution to the Control of Photosynthesis under Different Environmental Conditions , 1987 .

[21]  Lawren Sack,et al.  Leaf hydraulics. , 2006, Annual review of plant biology.

[22]  L. Kappen,et al.  Responses of stomata to changes in humidity , 1971, Planta.

[23]  N. Holbrook,et al.  Hydraulic Analysis of Water Flow through Leaves of Sugar Maple and Red Oak1 , 2004, Plant Physiology.

[24]  U. Maier-Maercker.  The role of peristomatal transpiration in the mechanism of stomatal movement , 1983 .

[25]  D. Grantz.  Plant response to atmospheric humidity , 1990 .

[26]  R. Dewar.  Interpretation of an empirical model for stomatal conductance in terms of guard cell function , 1995 .

[27]  G. Farquhar,et al.  A hydromechanical and biochemical model of stomatal conductance , 2003 .

[28]  P. Sharpe,et al.  An analysis of the mechanics of guard cell motion. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  The apparent feedforward response of stomata to air vapour pressure deficit: information revealed by different experimental procedures with two rainforest trees , 1997 .

[30]  A. Nardini,et al.  Circadian regulation of leaf hydraulic conductance in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. cv Margot) , 2005 .

[31]  Ross,et al.  Solutions manual for physical chemistry , 1980 .

[32]  K. Mott,et al.  Stomatal responses to humidity and temperature in darkness. , 2010, Plant, cell & environment.