Early Motion Processes and the Kinetic Depth Effect

It has been known for over 30 years that motion information alone is sufficient to yield a vivid impression of three-dimensional object structure. For example, a computer simulation of a transparent sphere, the surface of which is randomly speckled with dots, gives no impression of depth when presented as a stationary pattern on a visual display. As soon as the sphere is made to rotate in a series of discrete steps or frames, its 3-D structure becomes apparent. Three experiments are described which use this stimulus, and find that depth perception in these conditions depends crucially on the spatial and temporal properties of the display: 1. Depth is seen reliably only for between-frame rotations of less than 15°, using two-frame and four-frame sequences. 2. Parametric observations using a wide range of frame durations and inter-frame intervals reveal that depth is seen only for inter-frame intervals below 80 msec and is optimal when the stimulus can be sampled at intervals of about 40–60 msec. 3. Monoptic presentation of two frames of the stimulus is sufficient to yield depth, but the impression is destroyed by dichoptic presentation. These data are in close agreement with the observed limits of direction perception in experiments using “short-range” stimuli. It is concluded that depth perception in the motion display used in these experiments depends on the outputs of low-level or “short-range” motion detectors.

[1]  Curtis L. Baker,et al.  Eccentricity-dependent scaling of the limits for short-range apparent motion perception , 1985, Vision Research.

[2]  S. Anstis.  The perception of apparent movement. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[3]  J S Lappin,et al.  Minimal conditions for the visual detection of structure and motion in three dimensions. , 1980, Science.

[4]  O. Braddick.  A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[5]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Phase effects in monoptic and dichoptic temporal integration: Flicker and motion detection , 1981, Vision Research.

[6]  J. T. Petersik,et al.  The Effects of Spatial and Temporal Factors on the Perception of Stroboscopic Rotation Simulations , 1980, Perception.

[7]  P A Kolers,et al.  Figural change in apparent motion. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  Paul D. Bourke,et al.  A contouring subroutine , 1987 .

[9]  B. Rogers,et al.  Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception , 1982, Vision Research.

[10]  O J Braddick,et al.  Temporal Properties of the Short-Range Process in Apparent Motion , 1985, Perception.

[11]  W. Newsome,et al.  Motion selectivity in macaque visual cortex. II. Spatiotemporal range of directional interactions in MT and V1. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  K Prazdny.  Three-Dimensional Structure from Long-Range Apparent Motion , 1986, Perception.

[13]  W. C. Shipley,et al.  Beta apparent movement under binocular, monocular and interocular stimulation. , 1945, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  A Pantle,et al.  Discontinuity limits for the generation of visual motion aftereffects with sine- and square-wave gratings. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Parallel processing of binocular disparity in the cat’s retinogeniculocortical pathways , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[16]  D. Y. Solandt,et al.  Propagation of the measurement uncertainty for the numerical reconstruction of holograms in Fresnel approximation , 2018, Speckle: International Conference on Speckle Metrology.

[17]  S. Ullman.  Recent Computational Studies in the Interpretation of Structure from Motion , 1983 .

[18]  J. Weitz,et al.  Central and peripheral factors in the phi phenomenon. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  Ellen C. Hildreth,et al.  Measurement of Visual Motion , 1984 .

[20]  S Ullman,et al.  Maximizing Rigidity: The Incremental Recovery of 3-D Structure from Rigid and Nonrigid Motion , 1984, Perception.

[21]  O J Braddick,et al.  Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[22]  W. Newsome,et al.  Motion selectivity in macaque visual cortex. I. Mechanisms of direction and speed selectivity in extrastriate area MT. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.