Clinical trials in ovarian carcinoma: requirements for standard approaches and regimens.

The 3rd International Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (OCCC), held 3–5 September 2004, in Baden-Baden, Germany, addressed 12 questions critical to the future directions of clinical research into the treatment of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. Four of these questions examined issues related to the current standard of care and to what should, for now, constitute a proper control arm in future phase III clinical trials. These questions are listed in Table 1. Consensus on the answer to these four questions is crucial to the interpretation of major clinical trials. Such a consensus will encourage the use of similar standards in each major trial and thus will provide a common basis for interpretation. This article will provide a detailed discussion of the rationale for the unanimous consensus achieved for each of these four questions.

[1]  E. Eisenhauer,et al.  Gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) vs. carboplatin (C) in platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (OVCA). Results of a Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup randomized phase III trial of the AGO OVAR, the NCIC CTG and the EORTC GCG , 2004 .

[2]  M. Parmar,et al.  Erratum: The ICON and AGO Collaborators. Paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional platinum-based chemotherapy in women with relapsed ovarian cancer: The ICON4/AGO-OVAR-2.2 trial (Lancet (2003) 361 (2099-106)) , 2003 .

[3]  T. Bauknecht,et al.  A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  Robert S Mannel,et al.  Phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  B. Hagen,et al.  THE EFFECT OF CENTRALIZATION OF PRIMARY SURGERY ON SURVIVAL IN OVARIAN CANCER PATIENTS , 2003, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[6]  V. Torri,et al.  Paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional platinum-based chemotherapy in women with relapsed ovarian cancer: the ICON4/AGO-OVAR-2.2 trial , 2003, The Lancet.

[7]  M. Parmar,et al.  International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Trial 1 and Adjuvant ChemoTherapy In Ovarian Neoplasm Trial: Two Parallel Randomized Phase III Trials of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage Ovarian Carcinoma. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  I. Tannock,et al.  Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus standard chemotherapy with either single-agent carboplatin or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in women with ovarian cancer: the ICON3 randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[9]  E. Trimble,et al.  Survival Effect of Maximal Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma During the Platinum Era: A Meta-Analysis , 2002 .

[10]  D Guthrie,et al.  Recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus topotecan. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  M. Ratajczak,et al.  Investigating the platelet-sparing mechanism of paclitaxel/carboplatin combination chemotherapy. , 2001, Blood.

[12]  S. Pecorelli,et al.  Surgery of advanced malignant epithelial tumours of the ovary. , 2000, Forum.

[13]  A. Covens A critique of surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer. , 2000, Gynecologic oncology.

[14]  C. Pomel,et al.  Cytoreductive surgery for advanced stages of ovarian cancer. , 2000, Seminars in surgical oncology.

[15]  M. Piccart,et al.  Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: three-year results. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  F M Muggia,et al.  Phase III randomized study of cisplatin versus paclitaxel versus cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with suboptimal stage III or IV ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  D. Hole,et al.  Specialist gynaecologists and survival outcome in ovarian cancer: a Scottish national study of 1866 patients , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[18]  E. Partridge,et al.  Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer , 1996, New England Journal of Medicine.

[19]  M. Buyse,et al.  The effect of debulking surgery after induction chemotherapy on the prognosis in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecological Cancer Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Allen Dg,et al.  A meta-analysis of residual disease and survival in stage III and IV carcinoma of the ovary. , 1995 .

[21]  J B Vermorken,et al.  European-Canadian randomized trial of paclitaxel in relapsed ovarian cancer: high-dose versus low-dose and long versus short infusion. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  S. Kehoe,et al.  The influence of the operating surgeon's specialisation on patient survival in ovarian carcinoma. , 1994, British Journal of Cancer.

[23]  J. Berek,et al.  The effect of diameter of largest residual disease on survival after primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with suboptimal residual epithelial ovarian carcinoma. , 1994, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  B. Sevin,et al.  National survey of ovarian carcinoma part V. The impact of physician's specialty on patients' survival , 1993, Cancer.

[25]  K. Nielsen,et al.  A prospective randomized comparison of 6 and 12 cycles of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and cisplatin in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a Danish Ovarian Study Group trial (DACOVA). , 1993, Gynecologic oncology.

[26]  J. Thigpen,et al.  The influence of cytoreductive surgery on recurrence-free interval and survival in small-volume stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 1992, Gynecologic oncology.

[27]  N. Spirtos,et al.  The impact of subspecialty training on the management of advanced ovarian cancer. , 1992, Gynecologic oncology.

[28]  S. Rubin,et al.  Randomized prospective trial of 5 versus 10 cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced ovarian carcinoma. , 1992, Gynecologic oncology.

[29]  P. Wingo,et al.  The diagnosis of ovarian cancer by pathologists: how often do diagnoses by contributing pathologists agree with a panel of gynecologic pathologists? , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  T. Ulbright,et al.  Evaluation of the reproducibility of the World Health Organization classification of common ovarian cancers. With emphasis on methodology. , 1987, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[31]  F. A. Langley,et al.  Interpathologist and intrapathologist disagreement in ovarian tumor grading and typing. , 1986, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.