User Perceptions and Employment of Interface Agents for Email Notification: An Inductive Approach

This study investigates user perceptions and employment of interface agents for email notification to answer three research questions pertaining to user demographics, typical usage, and perceptions of this technology. A survey instrument was administered to 75 email interface agent users. Current email interface agent users are predominantly male, well-educated and well-off innovative individuals who are occupied in the IS/IT sector, utilize email heavily and reside in an English-speaking country. They use agents to announce incoming messages and calendar reminders. The key factors why they like to use agents are perceived usefulness, enjoyment, ease of use, attractiveness, social image, an agent’s reliability and personalization. The major factors why they dislike doing so are perceived intrusiveness of an agent, agent-system interference and incompatibility. Users envision ‘ideal email notification agents’ as highly intelligent applications delivering messages in a non-intrusive yet persistent manner. A model of agent acceptance and use is suggested.

[1]  J. Daniel Couger,et al.  Motivating and managing computer personnel , 1980 .

[2]  Alexander Serenko,et al.  Intelligent agents as innovations , 2004, AI & SOCIETY.

[3]  J. Romeyn.  Hypotheses and Inductive Predictions , 2004 .

[4]  Jamie Murphy,et al.  Journey to nowhere? E-mail customer service by travel agents in Singapore , 2003 .

[5]  Dale L. Goodhue,et al.  Development and Measurement Validity of a Task-Technology Fit Instrument for User Evaluations of Inf , 1998 .

[6]  Mark Perry,et al.  Dealing with mobile conversations in public places: some implications for the design of socially intrusive technologies , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[7]  R. Cooper,et al.  New industrial financial services: What distinguishes the winners , 1991 .

[8]  Carl Staelin,et al.  A Personal Email Assistant , 2002 .

[9]  Alexander Serenko,et al.  The use of interface agents for email notification in critical incidents , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Charles D. Barrett.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[11]  Iker Gondra.  Parallelizing Genetic Algorithms: A Case Study , 2008 .

[12]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[13]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[14]  Brian Detlor.  Towards Knowledge Portals , 2004, Information Science and Knowledge Management.

[15]  R. Daft,et al.  Understanding Managers' Media Choices: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective , 1990 .

[16]  V. Sugumaran.  The Inaugural Issue of the International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies , 2005 .

[17]  H. Lieberman,et al.  Agents for the User Interface , 2003 .

[18]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Dealing with mobility: understanding access anytime, anywhere , 2001, TCHI.

[19]  Sabine Moisan,et al.  Generating Knowledge-Based System Generators: A Software Engineering Approach , 2010, Int. J. Intell. Inf. Technol..

[20]  Christian Lüthje.  Characteristics of Innovating Users in a Consumer Goods Field: An Empirical Study of Sport-Related Product Consumers , 2002 .

[21]  Alexander Serenko.  The Importance of Interface Agent Characteristics from the End-User Perspective , 2008 .

[22]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[23]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[24]  Vijayan Sugumaran,et al.  Methodological Advancements in Intelligent Information Technologies: Evolutionary Trends , 2009 .

[25]  William C. Miller,et al.  The Creative Edge: Fostering Innovation Where You Work , 1987 .

[26]  Brian Detlor.  Towards Knowledge Portals: From Human Issues to Intelligent Agents , 2004 .

[27]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[28]  Alexander Serenko,et al.  Are interface agents scapegoats? Attributions of responsibility in human-agent interaction , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[29]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  A collaborative assistant for email , 1999, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[30]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[31]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Technology use , 1990 .

[32]  Susanne van Mulken,et al.  The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[33]  Gregory R. Madey,et al.  Modeling the Free/Open Source Software Community: A Quantitative Investigation , 2008 .

[34]  Steven J. Plimpton,et al.  Massively parallel methods for engineering and science problems , 1994, CACM.

[35]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  T. Koda,et al.  Agents with faces: the effect of personification , 1996, Proceedings 5th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication. RO-MAN'96 TSUKUBA.

[37]  Janet Fulk.  Social construction of communication technology , 1993 .

[38]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media , 1987 .

[39]  Jeffrey O. Kephart,et al.  Incremental Learning in SwiftFile , 2000, ICML.

[40]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Consistency of personality in interactive characters: verbal cues, non-verbal cues, and user characteristics , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[41]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Agents that reduce work and information overload , 1994, CACM.

[42]  Phillip G. Armour.  The organism and the mechanism of projects , 2002, CACM.

[43]  R. Rice.  Media Appropriateness Using Social Presence Theory to Compare Traditional and New Organizational Media , 1993 .

[44]  Charles F. Hofacker,et al.  Measuring consumer innovativeness , 1991 .

[45]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[46]  J. Daniel Couger,et al.  Person: Innovation Styles Profile of IS Personnel vs Other Occupations , 1996 .

[47]  Huaiqing Wang,et al.  An Agent-Based Approach to Process Management in E-Learning Environments , 2008, Int. J. Intell. Inf. Technol..

[48]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[49]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[50]  Susan M. Keaveney,et al.  Customer Switching Behavior in Service Industries: An Exploratory Study , 1995 .

[51]  Ioannis Vlahavas,et al.  Artificial Intelligence for Advanced Problem Solving Techniques , 2008 .

[52]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[53]  Christian Lüthje.  Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field , 2004 .

[54]  Victoria Bellotti,et al.  E-mail as habitat: an exploration of embedded personal information management , 2001, INTR.

[55]  D. Midgley,et al.  Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement , 1978 .

[56]  Vijayan Sugumaran.  Intelligent Information Technologies: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications , 2007 .

[57]  Alexander Serenko,et al.  The development of an instrument to measure the degree of animation predisposition of agent users , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[58]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience , 1995 .

[59]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[60]  Don E. Libes.  Tcl/Tk‐based Agents for Mail and News Notification , 1997 .

[61]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media , 1992 .

[62]  Wim G. Biemans,et al.  User and third-party involvement in developing medical equipment innovations☆ , 1991 .

[63]  A. Myers,et al.  Clinical Experience with Goal Attainment Scaling in Geriatric Care , 1999, Journal of aging and health.

[64]  John R. Carlson.  Channel expansion theory: A dynamic view of media and information richness perceptions , 1994 .

[65]  Alexander Serenko,et al.  Unplanned effects of intelligent agents on Internet use: a social informatics approach , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[66]  Nick Bontis,et al.  End-user adoption of animated interface agentsin everyday work applications , 2007, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[67]  W. A. Lucas,et al.  Effects of E-Mail on the Organization , 1998 .

[68]  Huaiqing Wang,et al.  Intelligent Agent-Based e-Learning System For Adaptive Learning , 2011, AMCIS.

[69]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[70]  John Dimmick,et al.  The Gratification Niches of Personal E-mail and the Telephone , 2000, Commun. Res..

[71]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[72]  Lee Sproull,et al.  When the Interface Is a Face , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..