Supporting Information A: Modified Kinetic Model by Douma Et Al

The trajectories, referred to as lifelines, of individual microorganisms in an industrial scale fermentor under substrate limiting conditions were studied using an Euler‐Lagrange computational fluid dynamics approach. The metabolic response to substrate concentration variations along these lifelines provides deep insight in the dynamic environment inside a large‐scale fermentor, from the point of view of the microorganisms themselves. We present a novel methodology to evaluate this metabolic response, based on transitions between metabolic “regimes” that can provide a comprehensive statistical insight in the environmental fluctuations experienced by microorganisms inside an industrial bioreactor. These statistics provide the groundwork for the design of representative scale‐down simulators, mimicking substrate variations experimentally. To focus on the methodology we use an industrial fermentation of Penicillium chrysogenum in a simplified representation, dealing with only glucose gradients, single‐phase hydrodynamics, and assuming no limitation in oxygen supply, but reasonably capturing the relevant timescales. Nevertheless, the methodology provides useful insight in the relation between flow and component fluctuation timescales that are expected to hold in physically more thorough simulations. Microorganisms experience substrate fluctuations at timescales of seconds, in the order of magnitude of the global circulation time. Such rapid fluctuations should be replicated in truly industrially representative scale‐down simulators.

[1]  Guan Wang,et al.  Prelude to rational scale-up of penicillin production: a scale-down study , 2014, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[2]  K. Luyben,et al.  Experimental simulation of oxygen profiles and their influence on baker's yeast production: II. Two‐fermentor system , 1988, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  Barry Lennox,et al.  The development of an industrial-scale fed-batch fermentation simulation. , 2015, Journal of biotechnology.

[4]  H. Noorman,et al.  Substrate gradients in bioreactors: origin and consequences , 1996 .

[5]  C. Hewitt,et al.  Physiological responses to mixing in large scale bioreactors. , 2001, Journal of biotechnology.

[6]  Jens Nielsen,et al.  Influence of the Dissolved Oxygen Concentration on the Penicillin Biosynthetic Pathway in Steady‐State Cultures of Penicillium chrysogenum , 1997 .

[7]  Yonggang Zhu,et al.  Impeller Geometry Effect on Velocity and Solids Suspension , 2001 .

[8]  Ju Chu,et al.  Integration of microbial kinetics and fluid dynamics toward model‐driven scale‐up of industrial bioprocesses , 2015 .

[9]  Krist V. Gernaey,et al.  Experimental and in silico investigation of population heterogeneity in continuous Sachharomyces cerevisiae scale‐down fermentation in a two‐compartment setup , 2015 .

[10]  K. Luyben,et al.  Experimental simulation of oxygen profiles and their influence on baker's yeast production: I. One‐fermentor system , 1988, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  Pasi Moilanen,et al.  Modeling Local Gas−Liquid Mass Transfer in Agitated Viscous Shear-Thinning Dispersions with CFD , 2007 .

[12]  Angélique Delafosse,et al.  Euler–Lagrange approach to model heterogeneities in stirred tank bioreactors – Comparison to experimental flow characterization and particle tracking , 2015 .

[13]  Michael Yianneskis,et al.  Direct determination of energy dissipation in stirred vessels with two‐point LDA , 2005 .

[14]  Matthias Reuss,et al.  Dynamic Behavior of Microbial Populations in Stirred Bioreactors Simulated with Euler−Lagrange Methods: Traveling along the Lifelines of Single Cells† , 2004 .

[15]  Jérôme Morchain,et al.  Investigating the interactions between physical and biological heterogeneities in bioreactors using compartment, population balance and metabolic models , 2015 .

[16]  Jérôme Morchain,et al.  A coupled population balance model and CFD approach for the simulation of mixing issues in lab-scale and industrial bioreactors , 2014 .

[17]  Zheng Zhao,et al.  Scale-down of penicillin production in Penicillium chrysogenum. , 2011, Biotechnology journal.

[18]  Sven-Olof Enfors,et al.  Studies of insufficient mixing in bioreactors: Effects of limiting oxygen concentrations and short term oxygen starvation on Penicillium chrysogenum , 1988 .

[19]  B. McNeil,et al.  Response of Penicillium chrysogenum to oxygen starvation in glucose- and nitrogen-limited chemostat cultures , 1999 .

[20]  R. Mudde,et al.  Computational Study of Hydrodynamics of a Standard Stirred Tank Reactor and a Large-Scale Multi-Impeller Fermenter , 2009 .

[21]  D. Fletcher,et al.  An assessment of different turbulence models for predicting flow in a baffled tank stirred with a Rushton turbine , 2011 .

[22]  M. Lilly,et al.  Effect of cycling dissolved oxygen concentrations on product formation in penicillin fermentations , 1982, European journal of applied microbiology and biotechnology.

[23]  P. Verheijen,et al.  Dynamic gene expression regulation model for growth and penicillin production in Penicillium chrysogenum , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  Jos Derksen,et al.  Modeling of aerated stirred tanks with shear-thinning power law liquids , 2012 .

[25]  R. G. J. M. van der Lans,et al.  Mixing in Bioreactor Vessels , 2011 .

[26]  A. Dehbi A CFD model for particle dispersion in turbulent boundary layer flows , 2008 .

[27]  Frank Delvigne,et al.  A methodology for the design of scale-down bioreactors by the use of mixing and circulation stochastic models , 2006 .

[28]  Terry A. Ring,et al.  Residence Time Distributions in a Stirred Tank: Comparison of CFD Predictions with Experiment , 2004 .

[29]  Angélique Delafosse,et al.  CFD-based compartment model for description of mixing in bioreactors , 2014 .

[30]  Peter Neubauer,et al.  Scale-down simulators for metabolic analysis of large-scale bioprocesses. , 2010, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[31]  Peter Neubauer,et al.  Response of Corynebacterium glutamicum exposed to oscillating cultivation conditions in a two‐ and a novel three‐compartment scale‐down bioreactor , 2015, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[32]  G. Montante,et al.  CFD prediction of fluid flow and mixing in stirred tanks: Numerical issues about the RANS simulations , 2011, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[33]  G. Montante,et al.  CFD simulations and experimental validation of homogenisation curves and mixing time in stirred Newtonian and pseudoplastic liquids , 2005 .

[34]  D. Fletcher,et al.  Characterizing bubble column bioreactor performance using computational fluid dynamics , 2016 .

[35]  L. Liu “Advances in Industrial Mixing: A Companion to the Handbook of Industrial Mixing” , 2017 .

[36]  Matthias Reuss,et al.  Modeling the dynamics of E. coli populations in the three-dimensional turbulent field of a stirred-tank bioreactor- : A structured-segregated approach , 2006 .

[37]  W. Wiechert,et al.  Plug flow versus stirred tank reactor flow characteristics in two‐compartment scale‐down bioreactor: Setup‐specific influence on the metabolic phenotype and bioprocess performance of Corynebacterium glutamicum , 2016 .

[38]  Henk Noorman,et al.  An industrial perspective on bioreactor scale-down: what we can learn from combined large-scale bioprocess and model fluid studies. , 2011, Biotechnology journal.

[39]  A. Lübbert,et al.  Detailed investigations of the multiphase flow in airlift tower loop reactors , 1990 .

[40]  J. Heijnen,et al.  Application of metabolic flux analysis for the identification of metabolic bottlenecks in the biosynthesis of penicillin-G. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[41]  G. K. Patterson,et al.  Laser-Doppler measurements of turbulent-flow parameters in a stirred mixer , 1989 .