The resonant step frequency in human running

Abstract At running speeds less than about 13 km h–1 the freely chosen step frequency (ffree) is lower than the frequency at which the mechanical power is minimized (fmin). This dissociation between ffree and fmin was investigated by measuring mechanical power, metabolic energy expenditure and apparent natural frequency of the body’s bouncing system (fsist) during running at three given speeds with different step frequencies. The ffree requires a mechanical power greater than that at fmin mainly due to a larger vertical oscillation of the body at each step. Energy expenditure is minimal and the mechanical efficiency is maximal at ffree. At a given speed, an increase in step frequency above ffree results in an increase in energy expenditure despite a decrease in mechanical power. On the other hand, a decrease in step frequency below ffree results in a larger increase in energy expenditure associated with an increase in mechanical power. When the step frequency is forced to values above or below ffree, fsist is forced to change similarly by adjusting the stiffness of the bouncing system. However the best match between fsist and step frequency takes place only in proximity of ffree (2.6–2.8 Hz). It is concluded that during running at speeds less than 13 km h–1 energy is saved by tuning step frequency to fsist, even if this requires a mechanical power larger than necessary.

[1]  G. Cavagna,et al.  The two power limits conditioning step frequency in human running. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  Rodger Kram,et al.  Energetics of running: a new perspective , 1990, Nature.

[3]  G. Cavagna Force platforms as ergometers. , 1975, Journal of applied physiology.

[4]  J. Hamill,et al.  Predicting the minimal energy costs of human walking. , 1991, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  J. E. Cotes,et al.  The energy expenditure and mechanical energy demand in walking. , 1960 .

[6]  G. Cavagna,et al.  The determinants of the step frequency in running, trotting and hopping in man and other vertebrates. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  T. Fuchimoto,et al.  Optimum step frequency in constant speed running. , 1987 .

[8]  G. Cavagna,et al.  MECHANICAL WORK IN RUNNING. , 1964, Journal of applied physiology.

[9]  G. Cavagna,et al.  External, internal and total work in human locomotion. , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  D. Morgan,et al.  Effect of step length optimization on the aerobic demand of running. , 1994, Journal of applied physiology.

[11]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Hopping frequency in humans: a test of how springs set stride frequency in bouncing gaits. , 1991, Journal of applied physiology.

[12]  A. Minetti,et al.  Effects of stride frequency on mechanical power and energy expenditure of walking. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  R. M. Alexander,et al.  Running is priced by the step , 1990, Nature.

[14]  G. Cavagna Elastic bounce of the body. , 1970, Journal of applied physiology.

[15]  G. Cavagna,et al.  The determinants of the step frequency in walking in humans. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  R. Blickhan The spring-mass model for running and hopping. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  K. R. Williams,et al.  The effect of stride length variation on oxygen uptake during distance running. , 1982, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  T. McMahon,et al.  The mechanics of running: how does stiffness couple with speed? , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.