Application of two hydrological models to Weihe River basin: a comparison of VIC-3L and SWAT

Distributed hydrological models are widely used to simulate the runoff process and to evaluate the hydrologic effect of various management scenarios, It is not easy to immediately identify the similarities and differences between the different models, few studies have compared the results of different models when applied to the same catchments. Two hydrological models, Three-layer Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC-3L) and Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) are compared in their abilities to simulate runoff in Weihe River Basin in China over a six-year validation period.VIC-3L is a macro-scale hydrologic model based on soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer scheme (SVATS), which is designed to describe the land surface in numerical weather prediction and climate. SWAT model is a complex, conceptual, hydrologic, semi-distributed model with spatially explicit parameterization; it is a continuous time model that operates on a daily time step over long time periods. Two simulated results clear show minimal differences between two models throughout the validation period, although two models have some differences in structure and runoff mechanism. The runoff simulated by two models in spring and winter is underestimated than observed stream flow. The simulated runoff in summer by SWAT is bigger than that by VIC-3L, but is smaller in winter, the simulate runoff by VIC-3L is more flat than that by SWAT. An important difference between model results is the ability to simulate the response of runoff to LUCC, SWAT is a watershed based hydrological model, and it's more evident and accurate to study the response of runoff to LUCC than VIC-3L. The simulated runoff under the land use type in 2000 decreases 6.41% than that in 1986. The runoff has decreased by 15.18% in dry periods and shows an evidently decreasing tendency.

[1]  C. Perrin,et al.  Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments , 2001 .

[2]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a midsized semiarid watershed , 1994 .

[3]  Dennis P. Lettenmaier,et al.  Variable infiltration capacity cold land process model updates , 2003 .

[4]  Konstantine P. Georgakakos,et al.  The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP) , 2004 .

[5]  A. Jakeman,et al.  A comparison of metric and conceptual approaches in rainfall‐runoff modeling and its implications , 2001 .

[6]  Michael J. Stewardson,et al.  Comparison of six rainfall-runoff modelling approaches , 1993 .

[7]  Bart Nijssen,et al.  Regional scale hydrology: II. Application of the VIC-2L model to the Weser River, Germany , 1998 .

[8]  M. Franchini,et al.  Comparative analysis of several conceptual rainfall-runoff models , 1991 .

[9]  Enoch M. Dlamini,et al.  Effects of model complexity and structure, data quality, and objective functions on hydrologic modeling , 1997 .

[10]  Bart Nijssen,et al.  Eegional scale hydrology: I. Formulation of the VIC-2L model coupled to a routing model , 1998 .

[11]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  A Comparison of Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Techniques on Small Upland Catchments , 1985 .

[12]  V. Klemeš,et al.  Operational Testing of Hydrological Simulation Models , 2022 .

[13]  Walter J. Rawls,et al.  Predicting runoff from Rangeland Catchments: A comparison of two models , 1990 .

[14]  Tammo S. Steenhuis,et al.  Application of two hydrologic models with different runoff mechanisms to a hillslope dominated watershed in the northeastern US: a comparison of HSPF and SMR , 2003 .

[15]  V. Singh,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Watershed Hydrology , 2002 .

[16]  Konstantine P. Georgakakos,et al.  Intercomparison of lumped versus distributed hydrologic model ensemble simulations on operational forecast scales , 2006 .

[17]  D. Seo,et al.  Overall distributed model intercomparison project results , 2004 .

[18]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Performance of conceptual rainfall‐runoff models in low‐yielding ephemeral catchments , 1997 .

[19]  J. Refsgaard,et al.  Operational Validation and Intercomparison of Different Types of Hydrological Models , 1996 .

[20]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[21]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): Motivation and experiment design , 2004 .

[22]  J. W. Delleur,et al.  Comparison of rainfall-runoff models for urban areas , 1973 .

[23]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models , 1994 .

[24]  F. Naef,et al.  Can we model the rainfall-runoff process today? , 1981 .