Worldwide evidence of a unimodal relationship between productivity and plant species richness

Grassland diversity and ecosystem productivity The relationship between plant species diversity and ecosystem productivity is controversial. The debate concerns whether diversity peaks at intermediate levels of productivity—the so-called humped-back model—or whether there is no clear predictable relationship. Fraser et al. used a large, standardized, and geographically diverse sample of grasslands from six continents to confirm the validity and generality of the humped-back model. Their findings pave the way for a more mechanistic understanding of the factors controlling species diversity. Science, this issue p. 302 The humped-back model of plant species diversity is confirmed by a global grassland survey. The search for predictions of species diversity across environmental gradients has challenged ecologists for decades. The humped-back model (HBM) suggests that plant diversity peaks at intermediate productivity; at low productivity few species can tolerate the environmental stresses, and at high productivity a few highly competitive species dominate. Over time the HBM has become increasingly controversial, and recent studies claim to have refuted it. Here, by using data from coordinated surveys conducted throughout grasslands worldwide and comprising a wide range of site productivities, we provide evidence in support of the HBM pattern at both global and regional extents. The relationships described here provide a foundation for further research into the local, landscape, and historical factors that maintain biodiversity.

Anke Jentsch | Sandra Díaz | Giandiego Campetella | Jason D. Fridley | Valério D. Pillar | J. A. Bennett | Gerhard E. Overbeck | Carl Beierkuhnlein | Don Thompson | Marcelo Cabido | Martin Zobel | Camilla Wellstein | John Klironomos | Lauchlan H. Fraser | Stefano Chelli | Jason Pither | Jacob R. Goheen | Mari Moora | Bazartseren Boldgiv | Zhanhuan Shang | James Cahill | Reinhold Stahlmann | Alessandra Fidelis | E. Bork | S. Díaz | R. Pringle | M. Zobel | C. Beierkuhnlein | J. Cahill | J. Goheen | Z. Shang | L. Fraser | P. Manning | K. Naseri | Sandra Díaz | G. Overbeck | J. Wilson | T. Palmer | J. Fridley | J. Klironomos | M. Moora | V. Pillar | K. Koorem | J. Pither | A. Jentsch | A. Csergő | M. Sternberg | B. Boldgiv | A. Fidelis | S. Müller | M. Cabido | R. Mitchell | S. Bartha | Lucas Enrico | B. Foster | C. Carlyle | G. Campetella | C. Wellstein | S. Chelli | S. Sugiyama | C. Nabinger | H. Henry | Don Thompson | Diana Askarizadeh | Alexander Bittel | I. Boldrini | L. Brown | Ofer Cohen | David J. Ensing | Heath W Garris | M. Hohn | M. H. Jouri | Rachael Lawrence-Lodge | R. Long | Sheena Parsons | Mari Pesek | Kathy Roccaforte | Amanda Schmidt | R. Stahlmann | Gisela C. Stotz | S. Szentes | R. Tungalag | Sainbileg Undrakhbold | M. V. Rooyen | Talita Zupo | Marcelo Sternberg | Diana Askarizadeh | Sandor Bartha | Jonathan A. Bennett | Alex Bittel | Ilsi I. Boldrini | Edward Bork | Leslie Brown | Cameron N. Carlyle | Ofer Cohen | Anna-Maria Csergo | Lucas Enrico | David Ensing | Bryan Foster | Heath Garris | Hugh A. L. Henry | Maria Hohn | Mohammad Hassan Jouri | Kadri Koorem | Rachael Lawrence-Lodge | Ruijun Long | Pete Manning | Randall Mitchell | Sandra C. Müller | Carlos Nabinger | Kamal Naseri | Todd M. Palmer | Sheena Parsons | Mari Pesek | Robert M. Pringle | Kathy Roccaforte | Amanda Schmidt | Shu-ichi Sugiyama | Szilárd Szentes | Radnaakhand Tungalag | Sainbileg Undrakhbold | Margaretha van Rooyen | J. Bastow Wilson | Talita Zupo | M. V. Van Rooyen | Radnaakhand Tungalag | Sheena M. A. Parsons | Rachael Lawrence-Lodge | Mari F. Pesek | Jason Pither | David J Ensing | Kadri Koorem | G. Stotz

[1]  E. Borer,et al.  Causal networks clarify productivity–richness interrelations, bivariate plots do not , 2014 .

[2]  J. P. Grime,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF SHOOT PHENOLOGY AND DOMINANCE IN HERBACEOUS VEGETATION , 1977 .

[3]  J. Oksanen Is the humped relationship between species richness and biomass an artefact due to plot size , 1996 .

[4]  Martin Zobel,et al.  What determines the relationship between plant diversity and habitat productivity , 2008 .

[5]  Aaron Christ,et al.  Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R , 2009 .

[6]  K. Gross,et al.  Functional- and abundance-based mechanisms explain diversity loss due to N fertilization. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  T. L. Dickson,et al.  Plant community responses to long-term fertilization: changes in functional group abundance drive changes in species richness , 2013, Oecologia.

[8]  Peter B Adler,et al.  Productivity Is a Poor Predictor of Plant Species Richness , 2011, Science.

[9]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[10]  Roy Turkington,et al.  Frontiers inEcology and the Environment Coordinated distributed experiments : an emerging tool for testing global hypotheses in ecology and environmental science , 2012 .

[11]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[12]  L. Gillman,et al.  The influence of productivity on the species richness of plants: a critical assessment. , 2006, Ecology.

[13]  Katherine L. Gross,et al.  SPECIES RICHNESS IN A SUCCESSIONAL GRASSLAND: EFFECTS OF NITROGEN ENRICHMENT AND PLANT LITTER , 1998 .

[14]  Comment on “Productivity Is a Poor Predictor of Plant Species Richness”. , 2012 .

[15]  S. Goldhor Ecology , 1964, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[16]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[17]  K. Gross,et al.  Separating the influence of resource 'availability' from resource 'imbalance' on productivity-diversity relationships. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[18]  T. Rajaniemi Why does fertilization reduce plant species diversity? Testing three competition‐based hypotheses , 2002 .

[19]  Q. Guo,et al.  SPECIES RICHNESS AND BIOMASS: DISSECTION OF THE HUMP-SHAPED RELATIONSHIPS , 1998 .

[20]  L. Fraser,et al.  What drives plant species diversity? A global distributed test of the unimodal relationship between herbaceous species richness and plant biomass , 2014 .

[21]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Meta-analyses and mega-mistakes: calling time on meta-analysis of the species richness-productivity relationship. , 2010, Ecology.

[22]  Martin Zobel,et al.  Contrasting plant productivity-diversity relationships across latitude: the role of evolutionary history. , 2007, Ecology.

[23]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[24]  Craig Loehle,et al.  On the relationship between r/K selection and environmental carrying capacity: a new habitat templet for plant life history strategies. , 1990 .

[25]  Katherine L. Gross,et al.  WHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY , 2001 .

[26]  S. Polasky,et al.  Nutrient enrichment, biodiversity loss, and consequent declines in ecosystem productivity , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Brett A. Melbourne,et al.  Response to Comments on “Productivity Is a Poor Predictor of Plant Species Richness” , 2012, Science.

[28]  T. Seastedt,et al.  Detritus Accumulation Limits Productivity of Tallgrass PrairieThe effects of its plant litter on ecosystem function make the tallgrass prairie unique among North American biomes , 1986 .

[29]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  Applied Econometrics with R , 2008 .

[30]  J. Connell Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. , 1978, Science.

[31]  J. P. Grime Control of species density in herbaceous vegetation , 1973 .

[32]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[33]  S. Pierce,et al.  Implications for biodiversity conservation of the lack of consensus regarding the humped‐back model of species richness and biomass production , 2014 .

[34]  K. Gaston Global patterns in biodiversity , 2000, Nature.