Impact of the number of previous lumbar operations on patient-reported outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis or lumbar disc herniation.

Repeated lumbar spine surgery has been associated with inferior clinical outcomes. This study aimed to examine and quantify the impact of this association in a national clinical register cohort. This is a population-based study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine surgery (NORspine). We included 26,723 consecutive cases operated for lumbar spinal stenosis or lumbar disc herniation from January 2007 to December 2018. The primary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), presented as the proportions reaching a patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS; defined as an ODI raw score ≤ 22) and ODI raw and change scores at 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the Global Perceived Effect scale, the numerical rating scale for pain, the EuroQoL five-dimensions health questionnaire, occurrence of perioperative complications and wound infections, and working capability. Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine how the number of previous operations influenced the odds of not reaching a PASS. The proportion reaching a PASS decreased from 66.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 65.4 to 66.7) in cases with no previous operation to 22.0% (95% CI 15.2 to 30.3) in cases with four or more previous operations (p < 0.001). The odds of not reaching a PASS were 2.1 (95% CI 1.9 to 2.2) in cases with one previous operation, 2.6 (95% CI 2.3 to 3.0) in cases with two, 4.4 (95% CI 3.4 to 5.5) in cases with three, and 6.9 (95% CI 4.5 to 10.5) in cases with four or more previous operations. The ODI raw and change scores and the secondary outcomes showed similar trends. We found a dose-response relationship between increasing number of previous operations and inferior outcomes among patients operated for degenerative conditions in the lumbar spine. This information should be considered in the shared decision-making process prior to elective spine surgery.

[1]  F. Strömqvist,et al.  Additional operations after surgery for lumbar disc prolapse : indications, type of surgery, and long-term follow-up of primary operations performed from 2007 to 2008. , 2022, The bone & joint journal.

[2]  M. Grotle,et al.  Treatment rates for lumbar spine surgery in Norway and Northern Norway Regional Health Authority 2014-18. , 2020, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[3]  H. Brisby,et al.  Characteristics and predicted outcome of patients lost to follow-up after degenerative lumbar spine surgery , 2020, European Spine Journal.

[4]  F. Hellström,et al.  Minor effect of loss to follow-up on outcome interpretation in the Swedish spine register , 2019, European Spine Journal.

[5]  M. Grotle,et al.  Lumbar spine surgery across 15 years: trends, complications and reoperations in a longitudinal observational study from Norway , 2019, BMJ Open.

[6]  M. Grotle,et al.  Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis , 2019, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[7]  M. Grotle,et al.  Prognostic Factors for Persistent Leg-Pain in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Sciatica , 2017, Spine.

[8]  R. Ostelo,et al.  Determination of the Oswestry Disability Index score equivalent to a "satisfactory symptom state" in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine-a Spine Tango registry-based study. , 2016, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[9]  G. Ebenbichler,et al.  Predictors of an unfavorable outcome 1.5 and 12 years after a first, uncomplicated lumbar disc surgery , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[10]  S. Alahuhta,et al.  Depressive symptoms are associated with poor outcome for lumbar spine surgery , 2016, Scandinavian Journal of Pain.

[11]  D. Haschtmann,et al.  Influence of previous surgery on patient-rated outcome after surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[12]  A. Mannion,et al.  Predictors of improvement in quality of life and pain relief in lumbar spinal stenosis relative to patient age: a study based on the Spine Tango registry , 2017, European Spine Journal.

[13]  A. Jakola,et al.  The Risk of Getting Worse: Predictors of Deterioration After Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Multicenter Observational Study. , 2015, World neurosurgery.

[14]  John D. Koerner,et al.  Which Variables Are Associated With Patient-reported Outcomes After Discectomy? Review of SPORT Disc Herniation Studies , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  E. Ekman,et al.  Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions , 2015, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[16]  B. Sandén,et al.  Recurrent Versus Primary Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery: Patient-reported Outcomes in the Swedish Spine Register Swespine , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  L. Carreon,et al.  Patient-reported outcome measures unbiased by loss of follow-up. Single-center study based on DaneSpine, the Danish spine surgery registry , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[18]  M. Grotle,et al.  Prognostic factors for non-success in patients with sciatica and disc herniation , 2012, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[19]  L. McLeod,et al.  Interpreting patient-reported outcome results: US FDA guidance and emerging methods , 2011, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.

[20]  T. Solberg,et al.  Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine? , 2011, Acta orthopaedica.

[21]  A. Mannion,et al.  The outcome of decompression surgery for lumbar herniated disc is influenced by the level of concomitant preoperative low back pain , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[22]  D. Knol,et al.  Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  A. Mannion,et al.  The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: Part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[24]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[25]  David Cella,et al.  Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. , 2008, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[26]  H. D. de Vet,et al.  Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. , 2005, Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.

[27]  R. Sund,et al.  Risk of Multiple Reoperations After Lumbar Discectomy: A Population-Based Study , 2003, Spine.

[28]  J. Zwart,et al.  Eight Year Outcome after Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Comparison of Reoperated and not Reoperated Patients , 2001, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[29]  P. Pynsent,et al.  The Oswestry Disability Index. , 2000, Spine.

[30]  A. Kasuya.  EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. , 1990, Health policy.

[31]  G. Waddell,et al.  Failed lumbar disc surgery and repeat surgery following industrial injuries. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[32]  Meyer Saklad,et al.  GRADING OF PATIENTS FOR SURGICAL PROCEDURES , 1941 .