Long‐term contact fatigue analysis of a planetary bearing in a land‐based wind turbine drivetrain

This paper presents an approach for performing a long-term fatigue analysis of rolling element bearings in wind turbine gearboxes. Multilevel integrated analyses were performed using the aeroservoelastic code HAWC2, the multibody dynamics code SIMPACK, the three-dimensional finite element code Calyx and a simplified lifetime prediction model for rolling contact fatigue. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s 750 kW wind turbine and its planetary bearing were studied. Design load cases, including normal production, parked and transient load cases, were considered. To obtain the internal bearing load distribution, an advanced approach combining a finite element/contact mechanics model and a response surface model were used. In addition, a traditional approach, the Harris model, was also applied for comparison. The long-term probability distribution of the bearing raceway contact pressure range was then obtained using Weibull and generalized Gamma distribution functions. Finally, we estimated the fatigue life of the bearing, discussed the differences of the methods used to obtain the bearing internal loads and analyzed the effects of the environmental conditions and load cases on the results. The Harris model may underestimate the inner raceway life by 55.7%, which can cause large load fluctuations along the raceways. The bearing fatigue life is very sensitive to the wind distribution and less affected by the transient and parked load cases. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Long-term analysis of gear loads in fixed offshore wind turbines considering ultimate operational loadings , 2013 .

[2]  Yucheng Liu,et al.  Crashworthiness design of multi-corner thin-walled columns , 2008 .

[3]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Multi‐body modelling and analysis of a planet carrier in a wind turbine gearbox , 2013 .

[4]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[5]  Johannes Brändlein,et al.  Ball and roller bearings: Theory, design, and application , 1985 .

[6]  Trevor S. Slack,et al.  A Review of Rolling Contact Fatigue , 2009 .

[7]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Long-Term Probability Distribution of Wind Turbine Planetary Bearing Loads (Poster) , 2013 .

[8]  Qing Chen,et al.  Influence of microstructure and residual stress on the stages of case crushing , 1988 .

[9]  Z. Jiang,et al.  Optimization of a fender structure for the crashworthiness design , 2010 .

[10]  Jason Jonkman,et al.  Dynamics of offshore floating wind turbines—analysis of three concepts , 2011 .

[11]  Wolfgang Rulka,et al.  SIMPACK — A Computer Program for Simulation of Large-motion Multibody Systems , 1990 .

[12]  Jaume Betran,et al.  Fatigue load computation of wind turbine gearboxes by coupled finite element, multi‐body system and aerodynamic analysis , 2007 .

[13]  Robert Dominy,et al.  Evaluation of dual-axis fatigue testing of large wind turbine blades , 2012 .

[14]  X. Zheng,et al.  Calculation for rolling contact fatigue life and strength of case-hardened gear materials by computer , 1993 .

[15]  Wenbin Dong Time-domain fatigue response and reliability analysis of offshore wind turbines with emphasis on welded tubular joints and gear components , 2012 .

[16]  P. C. Paris,et al.  A Critical Analysis of Crack Propagation Laws , 1963 .

[17]  F. Oyague,et al.  Gearbox Reliability Collaborative (GRC) Description and Loading , 2011 .

[18]  S. Butterfield,et al.  Improving Wind Turbine Gearbox Reliability , 2007 .

[19]  Sandeep M. Vijayakar,et al.  Linearization of multibody frictional contact problems , 1988 .

[20]  J. M. Jonkman,et al.  Loads Analysis of a Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Using Fully Coupled Simulation: Preprint , 2007 .

[21]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Three-Dimensional Bearing Load Share Behaviour in the Planetary Stage of a Wind Turbine Gearbox , 2013 .

[22]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Time domain-based gear contact fatigue analysis of a wind turbine drivetrain under dynamic conditions , 2013 .

[23]  L. Houpert,et al.  A uniform analytical approach for ball and roller bearings calculations , 1997 .

[24]  Robert G. Parker,et al.  Stiffness matrix calculation of rolling element bearings using a finite element/contact mechanics model , 2012 .

[25]  Jonas W. Ringsberg,et al.  Life prediction of rolling contact fatigue crack initiation , 2001 .

[26]  Radoslav Tomovic,et al.  Calculation of the necessary level of external radial load for inner ring support on q rolling elements in a radial bearing with internal radial clearance , 2012 .

[27]  Masoud Rais-Rohani,et al.  A comparative study of metamodeling methods for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization , 2005 .

[28]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  EFFECT OF SPAR-TYPE FLOATING WIND TURBINE NACELLE MOTIONS ON DRIVETRAIN DYNAMICS: DE-RISKING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE DESIGN, Scientific proceedings of the European Wind Energy Conference (EWEA2012), 16-19 April 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark , 2012 .

[29]  Jason Jonkman,et al.  OC3—Benchmark Exercise of Aero-elastic Offshore Wind Turbine Codes , 2007 .

[30]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Time Domain Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Gear Contact Force in a Wind Turbine Gearbox with Respect to Fatigue Assessment , 2012 .

[31]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Modelling and analysis of floating spar-type wind turbine drivetrain , 2014 .

[32]  Poul Ejnar Sørensen,et al.  Grid fault and design-basis for wind turbines - Final report , 2010 .

[33]  T. A. Harris,et al.  A New Fatigue Life Model for Rolling Bearings , 1985 .

[34]  Michel K. Ochi,et al.  Applied probability and stochastic processes in engineering and physical sciences , 1990 .

[35]  B. P. McNiff,et al.  Variations in gear fatigue life for different wind turbine braking strategies , 1991 .

[36]  A. Palmgren,et al.  Dynamic capacity of rolling bearings , 1947 .

[37]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Long-term fatigue analysis of multi-planar tubular joints for jacket-type offshore wind turbine in time domain , 2011 .

[38]  Ilya I. Kudish,et al.  Modern State of Experimentation and Modeling in Contact Fatigue Phenomenon: Part II—Analysis of the Existing Statistical Mathematical Models of Bearing and Gear Fatigue Life. New Statistical Model of Contact Fatigue , 2000 .

[39]  K. Johnson,et al.  Mode II stress intensity factors for a crack parallel to the surface of an elastic half-space subjected to a moving point load , 1985 .

[40]  C. Richard Liu,et al.  A new methodology for predicting crack initiation life for rolling contact fatigue based on dislocation and crack propagation , 2008 .

[41]  Yi Guo,et al.  Determining Wind Turbine Gearbox Model Complexity Using Measurement Validation and Cost Comparison: Preprint , 2012 .

[42]  Youngsik Choi,et al.  Rolling contact fatigue life of finish hard machined surfaces: Part 1. Model development☆ , 2006 .

[43]  S. Vijayakar A combined surface integral and finite element solution for a three‐dimensional contact problem , 1991 .

[44]  Sandeep M. Vijayakar,et al.  Finite element analysis of three-dimensional conformal contact with friction , 1989 .

[45]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Model Fidelity Study of Dynamic Transient Loads in a Wind Turbine Gearbox: Preprint , 2013 .