A user study of the Impact matrix, a fusion based decision support for enhanced situation awareness

Todaypsilas asymmetric threats put new challenges on military decision making. As new technology develops we have new possibilities to support decision making in such environments. However, it is important that the tools developed take into account userspsila (commanderspsila) decision needs. This paper presents some initial user studies of Swedish commanders testing a prototype application developed to answer these new challenges introduced by asymmetric threats. The application aids commanders by supporting situation awareness in terms of providing an overview of incoming intelligence reports and displaying probabilities of future events. The user study focuses on how the tool can support commanderspsila daily decision making activities. The results indicate that the general concept could be useful for Swedish commanders and analysts, but some suggestions for improvements are made. The issues found in this study will inform the continuing evaluation of this tool.

[1]  M. Daily,et al.  A review of time critical decision making models and human cognitive processes , 2006, 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[2]  Jean Roy,et al.  Command Decision Support Interface (CODSI) for human factors and display concept validation , 2002, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion. FUSION 2002. (IEEE Cat.No.02EX5997).

[3]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Roberta Calderwood,et al.  Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[5]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  Information fusion: a decision support perspective , 2007, 2007 10th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[6]  M R Endsley.  SITUATION AWARENESS IN AVIATION SYSTEMS. IN: HANDBOOK OF AVIATION HUMAN FACTORS , 1999 .

[7]  Jean Roy,et al.  Concepts, Models, and Tools for Information Fusion , 2007 .

[8]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Supporting Decision Making and Action Selection under Time Pressure and Uncertainty: The Case of In-Flight Icing , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[9]  John J. Salerno,et al.  Information fusion for situational awareness , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[10]  D. L. Hall,et al.  Mathematical Techniques in Multisensor Data Fusion , 1992 .

[11]  Erik Blasch,et al.  Level 5 (User Refinement) issues supporting Information Fusion Management , 2006, 2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[12]  R. M. Akita,et al.  User based data fusion approaches , 2002, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion. FUSION 2002. (IEEE Cat.No.02EX5997).

[13]  Sonya A. H. McMullen,et al.  Mathematical Techniques in Multisensor Data Fusion (Artech House Information Warfare Library) , 2004 .

[14]  M. Endsley.  Situation Awareness In Aviation Systems , 1999 .

[15]  Richard T. Kelly,et al.  Impact of Naturalistic Decision Support on Tactical Situation Awareness , 1996 .

[16]  James Llinas,et al.  Handbook of Multisensor Data Fusion , 2001 .

[17]  J. Llinas,et al.  Human Performance and Data Fusion Based Decision Aids , 1999 .

[18]  Erik Blasch,et al.  JDL level 5 fusion model: user refinement issues and applications in group tracking , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[19]  J. Lowrance,et al.  Human-aided multi-sensor fusion , 2005, 2005 7th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[20]  Pontus Svenson,et al.  Using the impact matrix for predictive situational awareness , 2007, 2007 10th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[21]  Richard T. Kelly,et al.  Principles For Aiding Complex Military Decision Making , 1996 .

[22]  J. M. Irvine.  User issues associated with sensor fusion and ATR , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.