Sexual orientation and performance on sexually dimorphic motor tasks

Performance of homosexual and heterosexual men and women on two motor tasks which reliably demonstrate sex differences in opposite directions was examined. A Throw-to-Target Task and the Purdue Pegboard were administered to undergraduate students matched for age and program of study. A two-way ANOVA (Sex × Sexual Orientation) of the Throw data showed a significant interaction,F(1, 90) = 16.22,p ≤ 0.001, and a trend for an effect of sex,F(1, 90) = 3.72,p < 0.06. Heterosexual men outperformed heterosexual women, whereas gay men threw less accurately and lesbians tended to throw more accurately than their heterosexual counterparts. Differences in sports history or hand strength did not account for these effects. Analysis of the Pegboard scores found no interaction or main effect of sexual orientation, but the effect of sex was significant,F(1,63) = 7.01,p ≤ 0.02. Regardless of sexual orientation, women outperformed men and this difference remained significant even when a measure of finger size was partialed out. This study provides new evidence suggesting an association between sexual orientation and motor-performance profiles. As with cognitive tasks, the motor-performance profiles of homosexuals are composites of some male-typical and some female-typical abilities. To the extent that sociological factors have been controlled, the study suggests that both sexual orientation and motor/cognitive predispositions may have early biological contributions.

[1]  S. Resnick,et al.  Early hormonal influences on cognitive functioning in congenital adrenal hyperplasia. , 1986 .

[2]  D. Kimura,et al.  Manual activity during speaking. II. Left-handers. , 1973, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Warren H. Meck,et al.  Organizational effects of early gonadal secretions on sexual differentiation in spatial memory. , 1990, Behavioral Neuroscience.

[4]  Doreen Kimura,et al.  Nontrivial sex differences in throwing and intercepting: Relation to psychometrically-defined spatial functions , 1991 .

[5]  Clyde E. Martin,et al.  Sexual Behavior in the Human Male , 1948 .

[6]  B. A. Gladue,et al.  Sexual orientation and spatial ability in men and women , 1990, Psychobiology.

[7]  R. Pillard,et al.  Sexual orientation and cognitive abilities , 1991, Archives of sexual behavior.

[8]  P. Servos,et al.  Marked sex differences on a fine motor skill task disappear when finger size is used as covariate , 1990 .

[9]  B. McEwen.  Sexual differentiation of the brain , 1981, Nature.

[10]  S. Levay,et al.  A difference in hypothalamic structure between heterosexual and homosexual men , 1991, Science.

[11]  B. McEwen,et al.  Testosterone implants into the amygdala during the neonatal period masculinize the social play of juvenile female rats , 1986, Brain Research.

[12]  N. Martin,et al.  Spatial ability and throwing accuracy , 1983, Behavior genetics.

[13]  D. F. Swaab,et al.  An enlarged suprachiasmatic nucleus in homosexual men , 1990, Brain Research.

[14]  B. A. Gladue,et al.  Neuroendocrine response to estrogen and sexual orientation. , 1985, Science.

[15]  Doreen Kimura,et al.  Neuromotor mechanisms in human communication , 1993 .

[16]  J. Money,et al.  Adult erotosexual status and fetal hormonal masculinization and demasculinization: 46,XX congenital virilizing adrenal hyperplasia and 46,XY androgen-insensitivity syndrome compared , 1984, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[17]  G. Sanders,et al.  Sexual orientation and visuo-spatial ability , 1986, Brain and Cognition.

[18]  R. Dittmann,et al.  Sexual behavior in adolescent and adult females with congenital adrenal hyperplasia , 1992, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[19]  M. Willmott,et al.  Cognitive characteristics and homosexuality , 1984, Archives of sexual behavior.

[20]  D. Hamer,et al.  A linkage between DNA markers on the X chromosome and male sexual orientation. , 1993, Science.

[21]  B. Graber,et al.  Neuroendocrine responses to exogenous estrogen: No differences between heterosexual and homosexual men , 1989, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[22]  J. Mos,et al.  Adult partner preference and sexual behavior of male rats affected by perinatal endocrine manipulations , 1991, Hormones and Behavior.

[23]  A. Slob,et al.  On the organization of partner preference behavior in female Wistar rats , 1991, Physiology & Behavior.

[24]  R. Gorski,et al.  Sexual orientation and the size of the anterior commissure in the human brain. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.