Spatial and temporal organization of multi-protein assemblies: achieving sensitive control in information-rich cell-regulatory systems

The regulation of cellular processes in living organisms requires signalling systems that have a high signal-to-noise ratio. This is usually achieved by transient, multi-protein complexes that assemble cooperatively. Even in the crowded environment of the cell, such assemblies are unlikely to form by chance, thereby providing a sensitive regulation of cellular processes. Furthermore, selectivity and sensitivity may be achieved by the requirement for concerted folding and binding of previously unfolded components. We illustrate these features by focusing on two essential signalling pathways of eukaryotic cells: first, the monitoring and repair of DNA damage by non-homologous end joining, and second, the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint, which detects and corrects defective attachments of chromosomes to the kinetochore. We show that multi-protein assemblies moderate the full range of functional complexity and diversity in the two signalling systems. Deciphering the nature of the interactions is central to understanding the mechanisms that control the flow of information in cell signalling and regulation.

[1]  S. Scherer,et al.  Molecular Cloning of the Human Gene, PNKP, Encoding a Polynucleotide Kinase 3′-Phosphatase and Evidence for Its Role in Repair of DNA Strand Breaks Caused by Oxidative Damage* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  A. Desai,et al.  The Conserved KMN Network Constitutes the Core Microtubule-Binding Site of the Kinetochore , 2006, Cell.

[3]  M. Lieber,et al.  Activity of DNA ligase IV stimulated by complex formation with XRCC4 protein in mammalian cells , 1997, Nature.

[4]  P. Sorger,et al.  Chromosome Missegregation and Apoptosis in Mice Lacking the Mitotic Checkpoint Protein Mad2 , 2000, Cell.

[5]  T. Blundell,et al.  The architecture of the BubR1 tetratricopeptide tandem repeat defines a protein motif underlying mitotic checkpoint-kinetochore communication , 2012, Bioarchitecture.

[6]  A. Levine,et al.  Structure of the MDM2 Oncoprotein Bound to the p53 Tumor Suppressor Transactivation Domain , 1996, Science.

[7]  H. Dyson,et al.  Coupling of folding and binding for unstructured proteins. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[8]  T. Blundell,et al.  Crystal structure of a FGF-FGFR-heparin complex , 2000 .

[9]  Elke Feldmann,et al.  DNA double-strand break repair in cell-free extracts from Ku80-deficient cells: implications for Ku serving as an alignment factor in non-homologous DNA end joining , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[10]  D. Lane,et al.  Design of a novel MDM2 binding peptide based on the p53 family , 2009, Cell cycle.

[11]  Bruce F. McEwen,et al.  Protein Architecture of the Human Kinetochore Microtubule Attachment Site , 2009, Cell.

[12]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein undergoes similar major conformational changes upon binding to either Mad1 or Cdc20. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[13]  M. Lieber,et al.  The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. , 2010, Annual review of biochemistry.

[14]  Christopher J. Robinson,et al.  Cooperative Dimerization of Fibroblast Growth Factor 1 (FGF1) upon a Single Heparin Saccharide May Drive the Formation of 2:2:1 FGF1·FGFR2c·Heparin Ternary Complexes* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  M. Babu,et al.  The rules of disorder or why disorder rules. , 2009, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[16]  S. Harrison,et al.  The Ndc80/HEC1 complex is a contact point for kinetochore-microtubule attachment , 2007, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[17]  T. Blundell,et al.  Towards a resolution of the stoichiometry of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-FGF receptor-heparin complex. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  V. Bolanos-Garcia,et al.  Cell cycle regulatory protein p27KIP1 is a substrate and interacts with the protein kinase CK2 , 2004, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[19]  P E Wright,et al.  Structural studies of p21Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1 in the free and Cdk2-bound state: conformational disorder mediates binding diversity. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Vladislav Yu Orekhov,et al.  Binding of intrinsically disordered proteins is not necessarily accompanied by a structural transition to a folded form. , 2007, Biochimie.

[21]  Pablo Chacón,et al.  Visualization of DNA‐induced conformational changes in the DNA repair kinase DNA‐PKcs , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[22]  István Simon,et al.  Molecular principles of the interactions of disordered proteins. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  E. Nigg,et al.  Uncoupling of the spindle-checkpoint and chromosome-congression functions of BubR1 , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[24]  P. Tompa,et al.  Fuzzy complexes: polymorphism and structural disorder in protein-protein interactions. , 2008, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[25]  Qian Wu,et al.  Non-homologous end-joining partners in a helical dance: structural studies of XLF-XRCC4 interactions. , 2011, Biochemical Society transactions.

[26]  Jessica K. Polka,et al.  Implications for Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment from the Structure of an Engineered Ndc80 Complex , 2008, Cell.

[27]  Griffin M. Weber,et al.  BioNumbers—the database of key numbers in molecular and cell biology , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  B. L. Sibanda,et al.  Asymmetry in the Multiprotein Systems of Molecular Biology , 2002 .

[29]  S. Jackson,et al.  XLF Interacts with the XRCC4-DNA Ligase IV Complex to Promote DNA Nonhomologous End-Joining , 2006, Cell.

[30]  K. Bloom,et al.  Tension Management in the Kinetochore , 2010, Current Biology.

[31]  Tomoyuki U. Tanaka Kinetochore–microtubule interactions: steps towards bi‐orientation , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[32]  A. Desai,et al.  KNL1 and the CENP-H/I/K complex coordinately direct kinetochore assembly in vertebrates. , 2007, Molecular biology of the cell.

[33]  Alicia P. Higueruelo,et al.  Atomic Interactions and Profile of Small Molecules Disrupting Protein–Protein Interfaces: the TIMBAL Database , 2009, Chemical biology & drug design.

[34]  Laurence H Pearl,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of the human DNA-PKcs/Ku70/Ku80 complex assembled on DNA and its implications for DNA DSB repair. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[35]  David P. Lane,et al.  Translating p53 into the clinic , 2010, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[36]  T. Blundell,et al.  Defining the Molecular Basis of BubR1 Kinetochore Interactions and APC/C-CDC20 Inhibition* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  T. Kapoor,et al.  The human mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1 regulates chromosome–spindle attachments , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[38]  Yongfeng Li,et al.  Modeling non-homologous end joining. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  Sheetal Sharma,et al.  Nonhomologous DNA End Joining in Cell-Free Extracts , 2010, Journal of nucleic acids.

[40]  T. Blundell,et al.  Structure of a Blinkin-BUBR1 Complex Reveals an Interaction Crucial for Kinetochore-Mitotic Checkpoint Regulation via an Unanticipated Binding Site , 2011, Structure.

[41]  T. Pawson,et al.  Reading protein modifications with interaction domains , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[42]  J. Tainer,et al.  XLF regulates filament architecture of the XRCC4·ligase IV complex. , 2010, Structure.

[43]  A. Fischer,et al.  Cernunnos, a Novel Nonhomologous End-Joining Factor, Is Mutated in Human Immunodeficiency with Microcephaly , 2006, Cell.

[44]  P. Simpson,et al.  1H, 13C and 15N resonance assignments of the kinetochore localisation domain of BUBR1, a central component of the spindle assembly checkpoint , 2011, Biomolecular NMR Assignments.

[45]  Zoran Obradovic,et al.  DisProt: the Database of Disordered Proteins , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[46]  Philip M. Kim,et al.  The role of disorder in interaction networks: a structural analysis , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[47]  Alicia P. Higueruelo,et al.  Structural interactomics: informatics approaches to aid the interpretation of genetic variation and the development of novel therapeutics. , 2009, Molecular bioSystems.

[48]  T. Blundell,et al.  BUB1 and BUBR1: multifaceted kinases of the cell cycle , 2011, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[49]  B. L. Sibanda,et al.  Crystal Structure of DNA-PKcs Reveals a Large Open-Ring Cradle Comprised of HEAT Repeats , 2009, Nature.

[50]  A K Dunker,et al.  Protein disorder and the evolution of molecular recognition: theory, predictions and observations. , 1998, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[51]  J. D. Bernal The origin of life , 1967 .

[52]  Philip M. Kim,et al.  Relating Three-Dimensional Structures to Protein Networks Provides Evolutionary Insights , 2006, Science.

[53]  David F. Burke,et al.  Crystal structure of fibroblast growth factor receptor ectodomain bound to ligand and heparin , 2000, Nature.

[54]  Peter K Sorger,et al.  Molecular organization of the Ndc80 complex, an essential kinetochore component. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  B. L. Sibanda,et al.  Structural Biology of DNA Repair: Spatial Organisation of the Multicomponent Complexes of Nonhomologous End Joining , 2010, Journal of nucleic acids.

[56]  L. Iakoucheva,et al.  Intrinsic Disorder and Protein Function , 2002 .

[57]  S. Lees-Miller,et al.  Repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks by non-homologous end-joining. , 2009, The Biochemical journal.

[58]  Debasis Dash,et al.  Role of intrinsic disorder in transient interactions of hub proteins , 2006, Proteins.

[59]  Ajit P. Joglekar,et al.  Chromosome Segregation: Ndc80 Can Carry the Load , 2009, Current Biology.

[60]  S. Oliver,et al.  Yeast systems biology: the challenge of eukaryotic complexity. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[61]  T. Pawson,et al.  Assembly of Cell Regulatory Systems Through Protein Interaction Domains , 2003, Science.

[62]  R. Albert Scale-free networks in cell biology , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[63]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[64]  T. Blundell,et al.  The Crystal Structure of the N-Terminal Region of BUB1 Provides Insight into the Mechanism of BUB1 Recruitment to Kinetochores , 2009, Structure.

[65]  Peter Tompa,et al.  Structural disorder promotes assembly of protein complexes , 2007, BMC Structural Biology.

[66]  T DOBZHANSKY,et al.  BIOLOGY, MOLECULAR AND ORGANISMIC. , 1964, American zoologist.

[67]  Avner Schlessinger,et al.  Natively Unstructured Loops Differ from Other Loops , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[68]  J. Tainer,et al.  Structural dynamics in DNA damage signaling and repair. , 2010, Current opinion in structural biology.

[69]  Stephen P. Jackson,et al.  Conserved modes of recruitment of ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs to sites of DNA damage , 2005, Nature.

[70]  R. Guérois,et al.  Delineation of the Xrcc4-interacting Region in the Globular Head Domain of Cernunnos/XLF* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[71]  David J. Chen,et al.  Live cell imaging of XLF and XRCC4 reveals a novel view of protein assembly in the non-homologous end-joining pathway , 2008, Cell cycle.

[72]  Philip D. Jeffrey,et al.  Crystal structure of the p27Kip1 cyclin-dependent-kinase inibitor bound to the cyclin A–Cdk2 complex , 1996, Nature.

[73]  H. Dyson,et al.  Equilibrium NMR studies of unfolded and partially folded proteins , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[74]  B. L. Sibanda,et al.  Crystal structure of an Xrcc4–DNA ligase IV complex , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[75]  Lilia M. Iakoucheva,et al.  Intrinsic Disorder Is a Common Feature of Hub Proteins from Four Eukaryotic Interactomes , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[76]  Yunmei Ma,et al.  The mechanism of vertebrate nonhomologous DNA end joining and its role in V(D)J recombination. , 2004, DNA repair.

[77]  V. Yang,et al.  Human cancer cells commonly acquire DNA damage during mitotic arrest. , 2007, Cancer research.

[78]  J. Walker,et al.  Structure of the Ku heterodimer bound to DNA and its implications for double-strand break repair , 2001, Nature.

[79]  Joshua N Adkins,et al.  Functional consequences of preorganized helical structure in the intrinsically disordered cell-cycle inhibitor p27(Kip1). , 2001, Biochemistry.

[80]  M. Lieber,et al.  DNA ligase IV binds to XRCC4 via a motif located between rather than within its BRCT domains , 1998, Current Biology.

[81]  Mitsuhiro Yanagida,et al.  Human Blinkin/AF15q14 is required for chromosome alignment and the mitotic checkpoint through direct interaction with Bub1 and BubR1. , 2007, Developmental cell.

[82]  Andrea Musacchio,et al.  Architecture of the Human Ndc80-Hec1 Complex, a Critical Constituent of the Outer Kinetochore* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[83]  J. Bartek,et al.  The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease , 2009, Nature.

[84]  Marc S. Cortese,et al.  Flexible nets , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[85]  Michail Yu. Lobanov,et al.  Intrinsic Disorder in Protein Interactions: Insights From a Comprehensive Structural Analysis , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[86]  A. Dunker,et al.  Disorder and sequence repeats in hub proteins and their implications for network evolution. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[87]  E. Laue,et al.  Molecular Analysis of Core Kinetochore Composition and Assembly in Drosophila melanogaster , 2007, PloS one.

[88]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[89]  Juri Rappsilber,et al.  The Protein Composition of Mitotic Chromosomes Determined Using Multiclassifier Combinatorial Proteomics , 2010, Cell.

[90]  Gustavo Caetano-Anollés Evolutionary Genomics and Systems Biology , 2011 .

[91]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  The unfoldomics decade: an update on intrinsically disordered proteins , 2008, BMC Genomics.