Carbon and water footprint of pork supply chain in Catalonia: From feed to final products.

A systematic tool to assess the Carbon Footprint (CF) and Water Footprint (WF) of pork production companies was developed and applied to representative Catalan companies. To do so, a cradle-to-gate environmental assessment was carried out by means of the LCA methodology, taking into account all the stages involved in the pork chain, from feed production to the processing of final products, ready for distribution. In this approach, the environmental results are reported based on eight different functional units (FUs) according to the main pork products obtained. With the aim of ensuring the reliability of the results and facilitating the comparison with other available reports, the Product Category Rules (PCR) for Catalan pork sector were also defined as a basis for calculations. The characterization results show fodder production as the main contributor to the global environmental burdens, with contributions higher than 76% regardless the environmental indicator or the life cycle stage considered, which is in agreement with other published data. In contrast, the results in terms of CF and WF lay above the range of values reported elsewhere. However, major discrepancies are mainly due to the differences in the co-products allocation criteria. In this sense, economic/physical allocation and/or system expansion have been mostly considered in literature. In contrast, no allocation was considered appropriate in this study, according to the characteristics of the industries and products under assessment; thus, the major impacts fall on the main product, which derives on comparatively higher environmental burdens. Finally, due to the relevance of fodder production in the overall impact assessment results, strategies to reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions as well as water use associated to this stage were proposed in the pork supply chain.

[1]  M. D. Vries,et al.  Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments , 2010 .

[2]  G. Flachowsky,et al.  CO2-Footprints for Food of Animal Origin – Present Stage and Open Questions , 2009, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[3]  P. Eder,et al.  Environmental Improvement Potentials of Meat and Dairy Products , 2008 .

[4]  U. Sonesson,et al.  Environmental impact of four meals with different protein sources: Case studies in Spain and Sweden , 2010 .

[5]  H. Blonk,et al.  Carbon footprints of conventional and organic pork : assessments of typical production systems in the Netherlands, Denmark, England and GermanyCarbon footprints of conventional and organic pork : assessments of typical production systems in the Netherlands, Denmark, England and Germany , 2009 .

[6]  Erik Mathijs,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of Flemish and Western Cape pork production , 2012 .

[7]  I.J.M. de Boer,et al.  Exploring variation in economic, environmental and societal performance among Dutch fattening pig farms , 2012 .

[8]  Ana Cláudia Dias,et al.  Life cycle assessment of pigmeat production: portuguese case study and proposal of improvement options , 2015 .

[9]  Takeo Shiina,et al.  A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products. , 2009 .

[10]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of pork production: A data inventory for the case of Germany , 2013 .

[11]  Stephen Wiedemann,et al.  Environmental assessment of two pork supply chains using life cycle assessment , 2010 .

[12]  Nathan Pelletier,et al.  Life cycle assessment of high- and low-profitability commodity and deep-bedded niche swine production systems in the Upper Midwestern United States , 2010 .

[13]  X. Gellynck,et al.  Carbon footprint of pigmeat in Flanders , 2014 .

[14]  J. Y. Dourmad,et al.  Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in pig production using Life Cycle Assessment , 2014 .

[15]  Lisbeth Mogensen,et al.  Fossil energy and GHG saving potentials of pig farming in the EU , 2010 .

[16]  Takashi Osada,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Japanese pig farming using low-protein diet supplemented with amino acids , 2013 .

[17]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Generalized Make and Use Framework for Allocation in Life Cycle Assessment , 2010 .

[18]  J. Bayo,et al.  Environmental assessment of pig slurry management after local characterization and normalization , 2012 .

[19]  H. V. D. Werf,et al.  Environmental evaluation of transfer and treatment of excess pig slurry by life cycle assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  Donald Huisingh,et al.  Progress in working towards a more sustainable agri-food industry , 2012 .

[21]  Celine Ginneberge,et al.  Carbon footprint of five pig diets using three land use change accounting methods , 2012 .

[22]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options. , 2006 .

[23]  John Tzilivakis,et al.  Environmental impacts of farm scenarios according to five assessment methods , 2007 .

[24]  H. V. D. van der Werf,et al.  Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in the manufacturing of pig and broiler feeds using Life Cycle Assessment. , 2011, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[25]  G. A. McAuliffe,et al.  A thematic review of life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to pig production , 2016 .

[26]  Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al.  Sustainability of the water footprint of the Spanish pork industry , 2015 .

[27]  Almudena Hospido,et al.  Assessing anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with agroindustrial wastes: the link between environmental impacts and operational parameters. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[28]  Baudouin Nicks,et al.  Review on greenhouse gas emissions from pig houses: Production of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide by animals and manure , 2015 .

[29]  J. Ryschawy,et al.  Evaluating environmental impacts of contrasting pig farming systems with life cycle assessment. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[30]  Jean-François Cabaraux,et al.  Ammonia emissions from pig houses: Influencing factors and mitigation techniques , 2011 .

[31]  I Traulsen,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment--methodology with special emphasis on European pork production. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[32]  John E. Hermansen,et al.  Impact of organic pig production systems on CO2 emission, C sequestration and nitrate pollution , 2010, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[33]  Paul Knight,et al.  Adopting and applying eco-design techniques: a practitioners perspective , 2009 .

[34]  Arnaud Hélias,et al.  Environmental assessment of nutrient recycling from biological pig slurry treatment--impact of fertilizer substitution and field emissions. , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[35]  Sara González-García,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of electricity production in Italy from anaerobic co-digestion of pig slurry and energy crops , 2014 .

[36]  C. Basset-Mens,et al.  Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France , 2005 .