Financial Arbitrage and Efficient Dispatch in Wholesale Electricity Markets

Virtual bidding is a type of transaction introduced into wholesale electricity markets to improve competition and pricing. This paper analyzes the theory behind virtual bidding and describes circumstances under which it does not work as advertised. The case for virtual bidding is predicated on an oversimplified model of the multi-settlement market design. The complexity of the unit commitment and optimal power flow problems forces the actual market algorithms to make compromises with the theoretical model. These compromises create situations in which virtual bidders can profit without improving system performance. Indeed, in these situations, virtual bidding can add real costs to system operation. The paper illustrates this with a specific case study of virtual bidding in California, and with a matching numerical illustration. The paper explains the general nature of the problem with experiences in other regions and other situations. The fault with virtual bidding identified in this paper needs to be incorporated into any assessment of the costs and benefits of virtual bidding.

[1]  Dan P. Werner Electricity Market Price Volatility: The Importance of Ramping Costs , 2014 .

[2]  D. Bunn,et al.  The forward premium in electricity futures , 2013 .

[3]  Richard P. O'Neill,et al.  History of Optimal Power Flow and Formulations Optimal Power Flow Paper 1 , 2012 .

[4]  Craig Pirrong,et al.  The price of power: The valuation of power and weather derivatives , 2008 .

[5]  Lester Hadsell Inefficiency in deregulated wholesale electricity markets: the case of the New England ISO , 2011 .

[6]  M. B. Cain,et al.  History of Optimal Power Flow and Formulations , 2012 .

[7]  Stratford Douglas,et al.  Storage and the electricity forward premium , 2008 .

[8]  Day-Ahead Premiums on the New England ISO , 2008 .

[9]  Johannes Pfeifenberger,et al.  Using Virtual Bids to Manipulate the Value of Financial Transmission Rights , 2012 .

[10]  Shoko Nakano Impact Mitigation for Emergency Events: Their Effects on Day-ahead and Real-time Market Locationlal Based Marginal Pricing at the New York ISO , 2007 .

[11]  Christopher R. Knittel,et al.  Inefficiencies and Market Power in Financial Arbitrage: A Study of California's Electricity Markets , 2004 .

[12]  James E. Payne,et al.  Day-Ahead Premiums on the Midwest ISO , 2009 .

[13]  Hany A. Shawky,et al.  One‐day forward premiums and the impact of virtual bidding on the New York wholesale electricity market using hourly data , 2007 .

[14]  Paul L. Joskow Remedying Undue Discrimination through Open Access Transmission Service and Standard Electricity Market Design , 2003 .

[15]  F. Longstaff,et al.  Electricity Forward Prices: A High-Frequency Empirical Analysis , 2002 .

[16]  Akshaya Jha,et al.  Testing for Market Eciency with Transactions Costs: An Application to Convergence Bidding in Wholesale Electricity Markets , 2013 .

[17]  Celeste Saravia Speculative Trading and Market Performance: The Effect of Arbitrageurs on Efficiency and Market Power in the New York Electricity Market , 2003 .

[18]  Erik Haugom,et al.  Market efficiency and risk premia in short-term forward prices , 2012 .

[19]  Constrained Capacity and Equilibrium Forward Premia in Electricity Markets , 2007 .

[20]  Alan G. Isemonger,et al.  The Benefits and Risks of Virtual Bidding in Multi-Settlement Markets , 2006 .

[21]  Lester Hadsell,et al.  Electricity Price Volatility and the Marginal Cost of Congestion: An Empirical Study of Peak Hours on the NYISO Market, 2001-2004 , 2006 .

[22]  Virtual bidding: a mechanism to mitigate market power in electricity markets Some evidence from New York market , 2010 .

[23]  M. Rothleder,et al.  Enhanced system reliability using flexible ramp constraint in CAISO market , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[24]  H. Bessembinder,et al.  Equilibrium Pricing and Optimal Hedging in Electricity Forward Markets , 1999 .

[25]  Michael Pavlin,et al.  The Role of Financial Players in Electricity Markets: An Empirical Analysis of MISO , 2013 .