Warning sound to affect perceived speed in approaching roundabouts: Experiments with a driving simulator

When examining facts concerning road safety, as stated by the United Nations General Assembly, one of the most important problems is vehicle speed. The aim of this work is to evaluate the potential influence of traffic-calming measures on drivers’ speed. In particular, attention focuses on warning sounds produced by communication between vehicles and infrastructures. A driving simulator experiment was used to test the effectiveness of three speeding countermeasures, located along the approach to a roundabout in a rural area, together with the control condition (i.e., no countermeasures, corresponding to the current configuration of the roundabout): a continuous pitch playing throughout driving along the road segment and pitches activated by vehicle detectors at either constant or wide-to-thin (decreasing) distances. Results showed that a continuous pitch is the most effective in reducing speed. Decreasing pitches still reduce speed to some extent, but constant spaced pitches only cause a small reduction in speed. Since continuous beeping seems to be more effective immediately after it starts, but becomes less effective either after a given time interval or as the driver approaches the hazard, then the same effect found with this particular setting should still be found with shorter but continuous beeping. Using a shorter beep should, at least in theory, reduce any feeling of annoyance in drivers, as is the case with an extended pitch.

[1]  Essam Radwan,et al.  Preliminary Validation of Driving Simulator Based on Forward Speed , 1999 .

[2]  Rossi Riccardo,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Random Utility Models and Fuzzy Logic Models for Representing Gap-Acceptance Behavior Using Data from Driving Simulator Experiments , 2012 .

[3]  Neal Hawkins,et al.  Sustainable speed management in small rural communities , 2011, 2011 IEEE Forum on Integrated and Sustainable Transportation Systems.

[4]  Riccardo Rossi,et al.  Analysis of driver task-related fatigue using driving simulator experiments , 2011 .

[5]  O V Lipp,et al.  The effect of warning stimulus modality on blink startle modification in reaction time tasks. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[6]  Antonio D’Ambrosio,et al.  Perceptual Measures to Influence Operating Speeds and Reduce Crashes at Rural Intersections: Driving Simulator Experiment , 2010 .

[7]  Riccardo Rossi,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Processing Spoken Words on Driving , 2012 .

[8]  Tom Brijs,et al.  Additional road markings as an indication of speed limits: results of a field experiment and a driving simulator study. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Andras Varhelyi,et al.  Auditory and Haptic Systems for in-Car Speed Management - A Comparative Real Life Study , 2008 .

[10]  Riccardo Rossi,et al.  Oppel-Kundt Illusion and Lateral Optic Flow Manipulation in Affecting Perceived Speed in Approaching Roundabouts: Experiments with a Driving Simulator , 2013 .

[11]  Frank Lai,et al.  Driving simulators for robust comparisons: a case study evaluating road safety engineering treatments. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Andrew Martindale,et al.  Effectiveness of transverse road markings on reducing vehicle speeds , 2010 .

[13]  Eric Meyer Application of Optical Speed Bars to Highway Work Zones , 1999 .

[14]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Driving Simulator Validity: Some Considerations , 1996 .

[15]  G G Denton The Influence of Visual Pattern on Perceived Speed , 1980, Perception.

[16]  Riccardo Rossi,et al.  A Methodology for Calibrating Road Link Travel Time Functions Using Data from Driving Simulator Experiments , 2011 .

[17]  Susan T. Chrysler,et al.  Driving Performance in a Simulator as a Function of Pavement and Shoulder Width, Edge Line Presence, and Oncoming Traffic , 2005 .

[18]  Dick de Waard,et al.  An Adaptive Driver Support System , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[19]  Francesco Bella Validation of a Driving Simulator for Work Zone Design , 2005 .

[20]  A. Kemeny,et al.  Evaluating perception in driving simulation experiments , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Claudio Meneguzzer,et al.  Gap-Acceptance Behavior at Priority Intersection: Field Observations Versus Experiments with Driving Simulator , 2011 .

[22]  William H. Levison,et al.  On-Road Versus Simulator Data in Driver Model Development Driver Performance Model Experience , 2002 .

[23]  Kenneth R. Agent,et al.  TRANSVERSE PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR SPEED CONTROL AND ACCIDENT REDUCTION (ABRIDGMENT) , 1975 .

[24]  Michael A. Regan,et al.  Use of manual speed alerting and cruise control devices by car drivers , 2007 .

[25]  Francesco Bella,et al.  Driving simulator for speed research on two-lane rural roads. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  A Drakopoulos,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE CONVERGING CHEVRON PAVEMENT MARKING PATTERN AT ONE WISCONSIN LOCATION , 2003 .

[27]  Sami Hanhijärvi,et al.  Multiple hypothesis testing in data mining , 2012 .

[28]  Thomas J Triggs,et al.  Driving simulator validation for speed research. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.