The Role of Shape in Comparing Objects: How Perceptual Similarity May Affect Visual Metaphor Processing

Comparing objects is a process necessary to cognitive tasks involving categorization. Shape is considered one of the primary vehicles for object categorization. We hypothesize that similarity in shape facilitates finding conceptual correspondences between objects, both for objects stemming from the same and from different conceptual categories. In the latter case, the comparison process requires the construction of an ad hoc category, which is also required when interpreting visual metaphors. We used three experimental tasks to investigate the role of shape in comparing objects: a similarity judgment task, a similarity rating task, and a production task. The results of our experiments support the hypothesis that an essential component of visual metaphor processing—comparing objects stemming from disparate conceptual domains—is positively affected by similarity in the objects' shape.

[1]  J. Grady Foundations of meaning : primary metaphors and primary scenes , 1997 .

[2]  Daniel Casasanto,et al.  When is a linguistic metaphor a conceptual metaphor , 2009 .

[3]  Thomas W. Schubert Your highness: vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Fernand Gobet,et al.  Foundations of Cognitive Psychology , 2011 .

[5]  Mark Johnson,et al.  The Metaphorical Structure of the Human Conceptual System , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  What looks like a jiggy but acts like a zimbo?: A study of early word meaning using artificial objects , 1978 .

[7]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Metaphor in cognitive linguistics : selected papers from the fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, July, 1997 , 1999 .

[8]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Language Comprehenders Mentally Represent the Shapes of Objects , 2002, Psychological science.

[9]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  Beyond Visual Metaphor: A New Typology of Visual Rhetoric in Advertising , 2004 .

[10]  Video Libraries Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Content-based Access of Image and Video Libraries, CBAIVL-2000 : June 12, 2000 Hilton Head Island, South Carolina , 2000 .

[11]  G. Steen Finding metaphor in grammar and usage , 2007 .

[12]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Ad hoc categories , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Marina Rakova,et al.  Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics , 2003 .

[14]  María J. Ortiz Visual Rhetoric: Primary Metaphors and Symmetric Object Alignment , 2010 .

[15]  Alfons Maes,et al.  Perceptual and Conceptual Visual Rhetoric: The Case of Symmetric Object Alignment , 2009 .

[16]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[17]  R. Gibbs Metaphor: Psychological Aspects , 2006 .

[18]  M. Lévesque Perception , 1986, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[19]  Helge Svare THE RELATIONAL CATEGORIES , 2006 .

[20]  S. Glucksberg The psycholinguistics of metaphor , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[22]  Brian F. Bowdle,et al.  The career of metaphor. , 2005, Psychological review.

[23]  Inge Boot Representation of Categories Metaphorical Use of the Container Schema , 2011 .

[24]  B. Indurkhya,et al.  Emergence of Features in Metaphor Comprehension , 2000 .

[25]  L. Boroditsky Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors , 2000, Cognition.

[26]  Serge J. Belongie,et al.  Matching with shape contexts , 2000, 2000 Proceedings Workshop on Content-based Access of Image and Video Libraries.

[27]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Object Shape, Object Function, and Object Name , 1998 .

[28]  三嶋 博之 The theory of affordances , 2008 .

[29]  Michael Flor,et al.  The Production of Metaphoric Expressions in Spontaneous Speech: A Controlled-Setting Experiment , 2005 .

[30]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[31]  Diane Pecher,et al.  Similarity is closeness: Metaphorical mapping in a conceptual task , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  Vincent Di Lollo,et al.  Temporal integration in visual memory. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  Klaus-Uwe Panther Finding metaphor in grammar and usage: A methodological analysis of theory and research: Gerard J. Steen, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2007, 430 pp., EUR 110.00/USD 165.00 , 2009 .

[34]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[35]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  F. Keil Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development , 1989 .

[37]  J. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[38]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[39]  D. Casasanto,et al.  Similarity and proximity: When does close in space mean close in mind? , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[40]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Deriving Categories to Achieve Goals , 1991 .